XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.misc, talk.politics.guns
XPost: rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
Tow the line or ELSE! Your obedience is expected.
In the race to be Speaker, Jim Jordan learns Trump tactics only work for
Trump
by Keith Naughton, opinion contributor - 10/20/23 4:00 PM ET
Intimidation, backstabbing and flaunting the will of the majority are all tactics that Donald Trump has used expertly to dominate the Republican
Party. Wannabe House Speaker Jim Jordan has tried the same gameplan, only
to find out that he’s no Trump. It took three failed ballots for that
reality to sink in for Jordan and his fuming, fumbling allies.
It was not so long ago the GOP House caucus voted to elect Steve Scalise
to be Speaker, defeating Jordan by a clear, but not overwhelming, margin
of 113 to 99. At that point, regardless of the outcome on the House floor, Jordan should have been disqualified for the job. He lost, end of story.
If Scalise could not get a majority before the full chamber, then
Republicans should have ruled out Scalise and Jordan.
But Jordan and his henchmen (and women) had another plan. A sliver of
caucus members announced they would not vote for Scalise, tanking his candidacy. While Jordan did publicly support Scalise, it did not sway the gaggle of holdouts.
After over 30 years working in, observing and analyzing politics, you
learn a thing or two about the public pronouncements of ambitious
politicians — namely, don’t trust them, ever. I have no doubt that Jim
Jordan’s public endorsement was a complete sham. In my opinion, he plotted
with his allies to block a Scalise win, planning to then bulldoze any opposition on his way to the Speaker’s chair.
It’s the Trump playbook: do whatever it takes to undermine your opponent
and then play a game of chicken, forcing the other guy to duck. But Jordan
is not Trump. Jordan does not have the charisma and feel for the room
Trump has. Worse, Jordan does not have Trump’s power — which means his
game of chicken simply won’t work.
Enough Jordan opponents realized that caving to Jordan’s tactics would
give a small minority a de facto veto over anything that happens in the Republican caucus. In short, letting Jordan win would neuter the majority
and this small minority would only become more aggressive and demanding.
The whole dynamic is less about ideology and more about game theory.
The incompetent politics of Jim Jordan
What is incredible is the utterly delusional behavior of Jordan and his supporters. Like Trump, they have only one strategy: louder and angrier.
Unlike Trump, they don’t have the fear behind them. They overplayed their
hand but are determined to keep overplaying it. Not to mention, they are complete hypocrites: now that their own strategy to sink Scalise is being
used against Jordan, they can’t believe it and are furious.
Looking to blame someone, Reps. Gaetz and Boebert? Look in a mirror.
It’s not a minor point that the cabal that de-railed the last Speaker,
Kevin McCarthy — just eight members — is much smaller than the group
opposed to Jordan, originally 20 and now 25 (and Scalise didn’t even come
close to winning enough support). Given the over-the-top rhetoric, attacks
on cable television and death threats that were sparked by the first loss,
the original holdouts have no option but to keep voting “no.” Anyone who
flips to Jordan realizes that he/she will just empower those who are
bullying them — they won’t have any independence whatsoever.
By going all-in on intimidation, Team Jordan only ensured that he cannot
win. It makes you wonder how people this stupid make it into Congress.
But there is a new risk on the horizon. Given how dysfunctional the
Republican Congress has become and how unrestrained Team Jordan has been against their opponents, it is possible that some Republican members may
decide they have had enough.
If Team Jordan gets too aggressive and vengeful after losing, all it would
take would be just five Republicans to cut a deal with the Democrats on
their way out the door to run the House; Jordan and the rest of the GOP
caucus will be completely out in the cold. And, angry as they will be,
they won’t be able to do a single thing about it. How do you punish a
retiring member — especially one who has already been the subject of death threats?
But politicians like Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert are just
not that smart. They think they have all the answers. Their carefully
plotted plans will always work and their opponents will just roll over and
die. They never think that their own tactics will be turned against them.
Team Jordan is no different from the leftists in academia who have spent
years shouting down and cancelling their opponents, only to cry victim
once the tables are turned on them.
One way out
The only way a party caucus in a legislature can operate effectively is as
a unified bloc with a set of rules. Those rules have to be flexible enough
to serve all the members of the caucus. Every member needs to believe that
the collective will work to support their survival. When you lose a power struggle, you have to admit defeat; the winners need to be magnanimous,
not punitive, as long as the losers agree to unite.
Jordan and his allies don’t understand any of this. They’re acting in the
exact opposite way to run an effective political bloc. What’s even worse
is that the GOP advantage is just 221-212, meaning they have practically
no margin for error. Not only does Jordan not understand politics, it
appears he can’t even count. Ever since the first failed ballot, it was
obvious only a nominee not named Jordan, Scalise or McCarthy can win.
In the end, the House GOP is getting what they deserve. They ran a
vacuous, pathetic midterm election campaign that far underperformed
historic norms. The party has no substantive policy agenda — at least, not
one that resonates with voters. And now we are witnessing what may be the
most egregious political malpractice Washington has ever seen.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4267204-in-the-race-to-be-speaker- jim-jordan-learns-trump-tactics-only-work-for-trump/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)