XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.politics.obama XPost: talk.politics.guns
On 03 Nov 2021, RichA <
rander3127@gmail.com> posted some news:slufrk$b7a$
153@news.dns-netz.com:
There is still time to correct this mistake. Two ropes over a tree
branch will do it.
Warning: This column contains news of evidence of possible forgery and
fraud in the long-form birth certificate of the president of the United
States and — bonus — his Selective Service registration card.
I figure the warning is necessary to prevent Americans, particularly
Americans who work in news media and politics, from hurting themselves on
any hard, sharp facts that might poke through my discussion of what is
surely the biggest scandal to emerge around the seemingly dodgy docs
Barack Obama is using to verify his identity.
I refer to the logic- and history-defying news and political blackout of
the March 1 press conference called in Maricopa County, Ariz., by Sheriff
Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse.
I ask you: Have you read in your local paper about the technical evidence
that led the posse’s three retired criminal investigators and two
attorneys to conclude that the birth certificate image White House
officials uploaded at the White House website on April 27, 2011, did not originate in a paper format, but rather was created (forged) as an
electronic file on a computer?
Have you seen on network or cable news the video clip (one of six posse
videos at YouTube) re-creating exactly how an additional fraud might have
been committed to forge the president’s Selective Service registration
card? Heard even conservative talk radio discussing the posse’s discovery
that immigration files in the National Archives recording overseas
arrivals into Hawaii are missing from the week of Obama’s 1961 birthday?
Or about the retired mailman’s affidavit attesting that the mother of ex- Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers enthusiastically told him that
she helped with ‘foreign student’ Barack Obama’s education?
I know my ears pricked up when, watching the posse’s press conference
online, I heard lead investigator Michael Zullo explain that the 1961
Hawaiian newspaper listings of Barack Obama’s birth confirm nothing
because the posse ‘can prove beyond a doubt’ that these newspapers
announced arrivals of foreign babies as well as native-born. Zullo also announced the posse had ‘documented evidence of two adopted individuals
who were breathing three years prior’ and were similarly listed as newborn infants. Heard anything about that?
I know the answer. You have read, seen and heard nothing — and certainly
not a peep from any representatives in Congress. The unique exception
seems to be poor Republican Rep. Cliff Stearns of Florida, whose mere
mentions (better than nothing) of ‘examining the evidence’ get him insta- hammered by the media and White House alike. Obama’s communications
director, Dan Pfeiffer, one of the presenters of the birth certificate at
the White House last spring, actually had the gall to call into question
via tweet Stearns’ fitness to conduct congressional investigations into
the Obama administration’s decision to funnel $535 million into Solyndra,
the bankrupt solar company. Why? Because Stearns dared to express interest
in evidence amassed by veteran law enforcement professionals under Arpaio, himself a 30-year federal law-enforcement official and five-time-elected sheriff.
‘1984’-style, we mustn’t question. We mustn’t look. We certainly mustn’t
look at questions that cross the narrative of authority. What are we, free people?
Apparently not. One editor told me the problem is the evidence of fraud
might prove to be true! A very famous conservative figure told me that if
the president were proved to be an identity thief, ‘that would alienate
too many people’ from the Republican Party!
I am reminded of Groucho Marx’s answer to the question, Are we mice or
men? ‘Throw some cheese on the floor and we’ll find out.’
Recently, Breitbart.com’s new editor at large, Ben Shapiro, was on Mark Gillar’s radio show, ‘Tea Party Power Hour,’ promoting his conservative
media organization’s ‘vetting Obama’ campaign. Gillar asked Shapiro if ‘vetting’ Obama would include investigating Obama’s birth and/or Selective Service documents. Absolutely not, Shapiro replied, explaining that he
didn’t believe this was an issue. ‘I am discouraging people from spending
time on this,’ Shapiro said, emphasizing once again that he himself did
not believe there were irregularities in the documents since, as he put
it, he knew Media Matters would be listening to the interview.
The walls have ears? Shapiro’s concern almost makes Media Matters sound
like a secret police outfit with a Gulag for journalists who ask too many questions. In reality, it’s an ideologically driven, left-wing attack
group funded by ideologically driven, left-wing George Soros.
Shapiro continued, quite candidly: ‘It’s an issue on which people are
being marginalized very easily and very quickly at this point.’
Marginalized by whom? The Soros-funded attack machine? The liberal-
dominated ‘mainstream media’? Fox News-dominated conservative media? The
Obama White House?
Clearly, something has us all on lockdown. That’s much, much scarier than
even the amazing possibility that some con artist might be pulling off the biggest scam in history.
Diana West is the author of ‘The Death of the Grown-up: How America’s
Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization,’ and blogs at dianawest.net. She can be contacted via
dianawest@verizon.net
https://www.pottsmerc.com/2012/03/23/why-the-silence-about-obamas- historic-scam/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)