On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 8:18:26 AM UTC-4, Mattb wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 07:36:59 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On 10/27/2020 8:22 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking >welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:08:22 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On 10/27/2020 5:05 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:58:03 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On 10/27/2020 4:52 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:18:51 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/27/2020 1:07 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:04:26 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/27/2020 1:02 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:58:11 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/27/2020 12:52 PM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:04:47 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On 10/27/2020 11:57 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:54:04 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On 10/27/2020 11:45 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:21:31 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j_ca...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On 10/27/2020 10:53 AM, matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat lied:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:51:01 -0700, Rudy Canoza <j...@phendrie.con>
wrote:
The Justice Department tried to intervene to represent President Trump
against the lawsuit by the writer E. Jean Carroll, who claims he lied when
he denied raping her.
By Alan Feuer and Benjamin Weiser
Oct. 27, 2020Updated 12:12 p.m. ET
A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that President Trump can be personally
sued for defamation in connection with his denial while in office of a
decades-old rape allegation.
The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court in Manhattan, rejected
the Justice Department’s attempt to step into the case and defend the
president. His ruling means that, for the moment, a lawsuit by the writer
E. Jean Carroll can move forward against Mr. Trump, in his capacity as a
private citizen.
[...]
But Judge Kaplan, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1994,
ruled against the department’s maneuver, saying Mr. Trump was not acting in
his official capacity when he denied the accusation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/27/nyregion/jean-carroll-trump-rape-lawsuit.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
It is an outrageously corrupt abuse of power for the DoJ to have ever been
involved in this at all. The DoJ is not Trump's personal law firm.
Impeach and remove Barr and put him in prison where he belongs.
Won't she now have to prove she was raped? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What is she suing over?
Defamation, you fuckwit.
Then she will need prove 'defamation'.
Fine. But Trump doesn't get to use the DoJ as his defense lawyer, and he
doesn't get to move the suit to federal court. The suit will be tried in
state court, and the rapist will have to hire his own lawyer at his own
expense.
True and he never should have I agree. Yet that isn't what her case
is about just a side issue.
For her, the case is about Trump's defamation of her.
Yes and now she has to prove he did.
Golly - ya think so?
Good I win you admit your mistake.
I didn't make any mistake. I never said she didn't have to prove that
Trump defamed her.
Yes you did.
No, I didn't. You lied.
matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat:
"Won't she now have to prove she was raped?"
Prof. Canoza:
"That's not what she's suing over, you fuckwit."
matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat:
"What is she suing over?"
Prof. Canoza:
"Defamation, you fuckwit."
matteeeeeeB the little illiterate cocksucking welfare cheat:
"Then she will need prove 'defamation'."
Prof. Canoza:
"Fine."
I never said that she doesn't have to prove Trump defamed her. You lied.
Really?
Yes. I never said that she doesn't have the burden of proof in her
defamation suit. You lied. You always lie.
Well should be a [sic] interesting trial for her to prove she was raped.
Not what she has to prove, you illiterate cocksucker. She has to prove she >was defamed.
You are insane what is she claiming she was defamed for. Rudy you
liberals are such idiots.
You lied. You said that I said that she doesn't have to prove defamation, >and I never said that. You lied. You're a chronic liar, just like your >hero Trump.
For the American
public, the case was about Trump corruptly using the DoJ as his personal
attorneys. Thankfully, the judge put a stop to that.
That part is good.
It is, but you being a Trumpswab, you don't really believe it. >>>>>>>>
No I voted libertarian this time.
The fuck you did.
Really? Then you can cite the evidence?
LOL! You have "evidence" that you voted for the Libertarian? Bullshit. >>>
You didn't vote "libertarian," and you didn't vote for *the* Libertarian.
You're a fucking liar.
Still a liar.
Its clear that you still crap in ya pants and throw it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)