• Re: Which would be OK if it were Constitutional, but it wasn't...

    From Leper@21:1/5 to Never left on Wed Sep 7 17:36:37 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On 9/6/2022 5:07 PM, Never left wrote:
    On 06 Sep 2022, Scout <me4gunzzzzz@centurylink.removeme.this2.net>
    posted some news:KHLRK.110117$IRd5.3833@fx10.iad:

    On 9/6/2022 10:12 AM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard
    who rode his scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly
    bawled and lied:

    https://www.infowars.com/posts/judge-reveals-biden-ordered-fbi-access-
    to-trump-mar-a-lago-docs

    A lie site telling lies. No, a judge did not "reveal" that Biden had
    anything to do with the 100% legal and constitutional search warrant,n
    because the simple fact is, Biden had nothing to do with it. Garland,
    and he alone, authorized the 100% legal and constitutional warrant.

    Garland works for Biden. Garland is such a chickenshit that he won't wipe his own ass without asking permission.


    China Joe gave the order!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)