On 2022-11-06, Joerg Lorenz <
hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote:
Hardware performance is irrelevant for iPhone users?
I did not say that. But relays like you are redundant.
Most users in the Usenet know how to use Google.
The first time you opined that dopey remark, I ignored it.
The next time you opined that dopey remark, I ignored it.
The last time you opined that dopey remark, I ignored it.
Most users on Usenet don't exude witless offal like you just did.
It's not a "relay" and if you read the source and compared it to the
message content, you'd deduce I distil to the remarkable points of view.
https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-14-pro-max-battery-test/
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max Battery test
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max had excellent power retention and delivery but contrary to widespread promotions it scored slightly below its predecessor.
The Apple 20W charger (not included) took 2 hours and 21 minutes which is longer than average. Similarly, the wireless charger took 2 hours and 44 minutes to fully charge the battery which was also longer than average.
Autonomy was very good when scrolling social apps but battery performance struggled when using the new demanding camera and during navigation tests.
The discharge currents & residual consumption were very low which indicates
a well-optimized device which lost less than 2% per night on average.
Compared with devices from the same ultra-premium price range ($800+), the iPhone 14 Pro Max earned the second to highest score, just below it's predecessor
Contrary to the widespread advertisements, the iPhone 14 Pro Max earned a
score just below its predecessor thanks to its excellent autonomy and efficiency. However, its charging score was among the lowest.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)