• [RUMOUR] iPhone 16 (or 17) won'ty have physical buttons

    From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 23 10:57:09 2024
    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose
    some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive
    touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true (and
    likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see Samsung make
    fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course then copy it six
    months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far better.
    Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their infotainment
    devices and steering wheels controls have realised they're crap and are
    moving back to physical ones instead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 23 07:41:48 2024
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose
    some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive
    touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true (and
    likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see Samsung make
    fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course then copy it six
    months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far better.
    Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their infotainment
    devices and steering wheels controls have realised they're crap and are
    moving back to physical ones instead.




    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to hugybear@gmx.net on Tue Apr 23 06:40:04 2024
    Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose
    some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive
    touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true (and
    likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see Samsung make
    fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course then copy it six
    months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far better.
    Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their infotainment
    devices and steering wheels controls have realised they're crap and are
    moving back to physical ones instead.




    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread and will >> be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?


    Aha, you’ve found Arlen again!

    Good job, jughead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilf@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 23 10:37:45 2024
    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose
    some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive
    touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true (and
    likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see Samsung make
    fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course then copy it six
    months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far better.
    Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their infotainment
    devices and steering wheels controls have realised they're crap and are
    moving back to physical ones instead.




    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread and will >> be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?


    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone 14
    and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I wish
    even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know which
    position it is in. Very useful. Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    --
    Wilf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilf@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Tue Apr 23 12:36:51 2024
    On 23/04/2024 at 11:28, badgolferman wrote:
    Wilf wrote:

    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will
    lose some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with
    capacitive touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out
    to be true (and likely on the high end model first), you'll
    probably see Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only
    to of course then copy it six months later on their own new
    phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.




    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced
    bread and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?


    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone
    14 and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I
    wish even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know
    which position it is in. Very useful. Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a troll.


    Well, I really hope not.


    --
    Wilf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Tue Apr 23 15:36:38 2024
    On 23.04.2024 12:28, badgolferman wrote:
    Wilf wrote:

    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced
    bread and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?


    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone
    14 and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I
    wish even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know
    which position it is in. Very useful. Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a troll.

    QED: You are Troll. A brain dead Troll not willing to contribute a
    constructive opinion.

    --
    "Ave Caesar! Morituri te salutant!"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Your Name on Tue Apr 23 10:18:39 2024
    On 2024-04-22 18:57, Your Name wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose some
    or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive touch
    buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true (and likely on
    the high end model first), you'll probably see Samsung make fun of how
    silly the idea is ... only to of course then copy it six months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far better.
    Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their infotainment devices
    and steering wheels controls have realised they're crap and are moving
    back to physical ones instead.

    Depends on the function. For cars, many things should be a physical
    button, dial or lever for speed of access and safety.

    If you have to take your eyes off the road to adjust the ventilation fan
    level or (esp.) select defrost (defog), then it is a safety issue IMO.

    As to phones, not much on the safety issue argument so ... we'll see.

    --
    “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first;
    nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.”
    - Charles de Gaulle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 23 10:20:01 2024
    On 2024-04-23 09:36, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    QED: You are Troll. A brain dead Troll not willing to contribute a constructive opinion.

    By replying to it, you oxygenate it.

    --
    “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first;
    nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.”
    - Charles de Gaulle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 23 10:19:14 2024
    On 2024-04-23 01:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    Just ignore it. Deprive it of oxygen.

    --
    “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first;
    nationalism, when hate for people other than your own comes first.”
    - Charles de Gaulle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wilf on Tue Apr 23 16:09:23 2024
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose
    some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive
    touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true
    (and likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see
    Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course
    then copy it six months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.

    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread
    and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone 14
    and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I wish
    even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know which
    position it is in. Very useful.

    Conceptually, I agree, but I can't tell you the last time I actually
    toggled the mute switch in my pocket - or toggled it all. It's generally something I set once and then forget about since I like my phones to be
    muted.

    Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Nope, you just have a different opinion. Differing opinions aren't a
    problem here. Trolling is. Can you distinguish between offering a
    genuine opinion and trolling? It seems maybe you can't.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Tue Apr 23 16:11:17 2024
    On 2024-04-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-04-23 09:36, Jörg Lorenz wrote:

    QED: You are Troll. A brain dead Troll not willing to contribute a
    constructive opinion.

    By replying to it, you oxygenate it.

    "it"? My, you sure are feeling superior today, aren't you?

    Touched a nerve? You trolls are thin-skinned losers.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wilf on Tue Apr 23 16:10:27 2024
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 11:28, badgolferman wrote:
    Wilf wrote:

    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will
    lose some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with
    capacitive touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out
    to be true (and likely on the high end model first), you'll
    probably see Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only
    to of course then copy it six months later on their own new
    phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.

    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced
    bread and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone
    14 and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I
    wish even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know
    which position it is in. Very useful. Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a troll.

    Well, I really hope not.

    badgolferman trolls here regularly, so if you are taking his word for
    anything regarding trolling, you're pretty gullible.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Apr 24 10:07:07 2024
    On 2024-04-23 10:28:27 +0000, badgolferman said:
    Wilf wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jrg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will
    lose some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with
    capacitive touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out
    to be true (and likely on the high end model first), you'll
    probably see Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only
    to of course then copy it six months later on their own new
    phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.

    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced
    bread and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone
    14 and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I
    wish even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know
    which position it is in. Very useful. Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a troll.

    Opinions are fine. It's posting* misleading or utter nonsense by the
    anti-Apple know-nothing brigade that makes it a troll.


    * Usually cross-posted to the Android newsgroup so they can impress all
    their "friends" there with how clever they are ... when in reality
    nobody in that newsgroup wants them either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sten deJoode@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Tue Apr 23 18:55:24 2024
    On 23 Apr 2024 16:11:17 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    QED: You are Troll. A brain dead Troll not willing to contribute a
    constructive opinion.

    By replying to it, you oxygenate it.

    "it"? My, you sure are feeling superior today, aren't you?

    Touched a nerve? You trolls are thin-skinned losers.

    The responses prove iCulists are ignorant childish bullies.

    Like a child, Alan Browne has no argument but to call people 'it'.
    Like a child, Jolly Roger calls all statements about Apple trolls.

    These iCultists are ignorant low IQ uneducated herd animals.
    They will use all their chilcish bullying, to force posters to only say
    that which is "approved" by the iCult herd animals that they are.

    Like pigs, they will butt you out of the herd for speaking the truth.
    Just watch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilf@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Wed Apr 24 00:27:15 2024
    On 23/04/2024 at 17:09, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose
    some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive
    touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true
    (and likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see
    Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course
    then copy it six months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.

    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread
    and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone 14
    and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I wish
    even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know which
    position it is in. Very useful.

    Conceptually, I agree, but I can't tell you the last time I actually
    toggled the mute switch in my pocket - or toggled it all. It's generally something I set once and then forget about since I like my phones to be muted.

    Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Nope, you just have a different opinion. Differing opinions aren't a
    problem here. Trolling is. Can you distinguish between offering a
    genuine opinion and trolling? It seems maybe you can't.


    Ooh, maybe I can't. Surely you can do better than put a genuine poster
    off ever bothering to make a comment here?

    --
    Wilf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sten deJoode@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Tue Apr 23 19:52:49 2024
    On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:46:58 -0500, Hank Rogers wrote:

    Join the iCult, and you'll have no problems here.

    None of the herd animals will disparage anyone who toes the party line.

    Yet the instant someone states a fact they don't like about Apple - they
    turn into a herd of instant ignorant swine - snorting like Jolly Roger pigs
    and charging like Alan Browne childish ignorant bullies always do.

    But beware of the anti-apple trolls. They are legion.

    You do realize they're not anti Apple... they just state the facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wilf@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Apr 24 00:24:05 2024
    On 23/04/2024 at 18:15, badgolferman wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a
    troll.

    Well, I really hope not.

    badgolferman trolls here regularly, so if you are taking his word for
    anything regarding trolling, you're pretty gullible.


    I think Wilf is old enough to decide for himself who tells the truth, notwithstanding your indirect insult of him.


    I reckon so.


    --
    Wilf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Wilf on Tue Apr 23 18:46:58 2024
    Wilf wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 17:09, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose >>>>>> some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive >>>>>> touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true
    (and likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see
    Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course
    then copy it six months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.

    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread
    and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone 14
    and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I wish
    even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know which
    position it is in. Very useful.

    Conceptually, I agree, but I can't tell you the last time I actually
    toggled the mute switch in my pocket - or toggled it all. It's generally
    something I set once and then forget about since I like my phones to be
    muted.

    Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Nope, you just have a different opinion. Differing opinions aren't a
    problem here. Trolling is. Can you distinguish between offering a
    genuine opinion and trolling? It seems maybe you can't.


    Ooh, maybe I can't. Surely you can do better than put a genuine poster off ever bothering to make a comment here?


    Join the iCult, and you'll have no problems here.

    But beware of the anti-apple trolls. They are legion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Sten deJoode on Tue Apr 23 19:23:53 2024
    Sten deJoode wrote:
    On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:46:58 -0500, Hank Rogers wrote:

    Join the iCult, and you'll have no problems here.

    None of the herd animals will disparage anyone who toes the party line.

    Yet the instant someone states a fact they don't like about Apple - they
    turn into a herd of instant ignorant swine - snorting like Jolly Roger pigs and charging like Alan Browne childish ignorant bullies always do.

    But beware of the anti-apple trolls. They are legion.

    You do realize they're not anti Apple... they just state the facts.


    You are being unfair. You simply haven't heard the apple gospel yet.

    I'm praying for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Apr 24 01:07:24 2024
    On 2024-04-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a
    troll.

    Well, I really hope not.

    badgolferman trolls here regularly, so if you are taking his word for
    anything regarding trolling, you're pretty gullible.

    I think Wilf is old enough to decide for himself

    I never claimed differently. And it's easy enough for anyone interested
    to read your trollish posts.

    notwithstanding your indirect insult of him.

    Not an insult (especially if he doesn't just take your word for it) -
    just the truth.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wilf on Wed Apr 24 01:07:54 2024
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 18:15, badgolferman wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Any opinion outside of the "approved" Apple one makes you a troll.

    Well, I really hope not.

    badgolferman trolls here regularly, so if you are taking his word
    for anything regarding trolling, you're pretty gullible.

    I think Wilf is old enough to decide for himself who tells the truth,
    notwithstanding your indirect insult of him.

    I reckon so.

    I guess we'll see then.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Sten deJoode on Wed Apr 24 01:08:31 2024
    On 2024-04-23, Sten deJoode <StendeJood@nospam.net> wrote:
    On 23 Apr 2024 16:11:17 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

    QED: You are Troll. A brain dead Troll not willing to contribute a
    constructive opinion.

    By replying to it, you oxygenate it.

    "it"? My, you sure are feeling superior today, aren't you?

    Touched a nerve? You trolls are thin-skinned losers.

    The responses prove iCulists are ignorant childish bullies.

    "No, YOU!!!" is the best Arlen has. Weak.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Wilf on Wed Apr 24 01:10:06 2024
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 17:09, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-04-23, Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> wrote:
    On 23/04/2024 at 06:41, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    Am 23.04.24 um 01:34 schrieb badgolferman:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    There are lots of rumors that the iPhone 16 (or maybe 17) will lose >>>>>> some or all of its physical buttons, to be replaced with capacitive >>>>>> touch buttons instead. Assuming the rumours turn out to be true
    (and likely on the high end model first), you'll probably see
    Samsung make fun of how silly the idea is ... only to of course
    then copy it six months later on their own new phone models.

    Personally I hate touch buttons. Physical buttons are far far
    better. Even car makers who had used touch buttons on their
    infotainment devices and steering wheels controls have realised
    they're crap and are moving back to physical ones instead.

    If Apple does it then it will be the best thing since sliced bread
    and will be defended to the death in this group.

    Do you have something material to contribute, Troll?

    I personally prefer physical buttons for some purposes. The iPhone 14
    and earlier mute switch is something I can actuate in which way I wish
    even in the dark or in a pocket and can also, by touch, know which
    position it is in. Very useful.

    Conceptually, I agree, but I can't tell you the last time I actually
    toggled the mute switch in my pocket - or toggled it all. It's generally
    something I set once and then forget about since I like my phones to be
    muted.

    Does this make me an "Arlen"?

    Nope, you just have a different opinion. Differing opinions aren't a
    problem here. Trolling is. Can you distinguish between offering a
    genuine opinion and trolling? It seems maybe you can't.

    Ooh, maybe I can't. Surely you can do better than put a genuine poster
    off ever bothering to make a comment here?

    I'm afraid if it's not the trolling that puts you off, but people who
    object to it, that's not a problem anyone but you can solve.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sten deJoode@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Apr 24 02:07:45 2024
    On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:36:42 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote:

    Ooh, maybe I can't. Surely you can do better than put a genuine poster
    off ever bothering to make a comment here?

    I'm afraid if it's not the trolling that puts you off, but people who
    object to it, that's not a problem anyone but you can solve.


    That's it Wilf! You are about to be classified as a troll now! Jolly Roger gets to decide all this and you are now in thin ice.

    I've studied Jolly Roger and, in his defense, I'd clarify that the best
    Jolly Roger can do, when he hates a fact about Apple, is call it a troll.

    Jolly Roger doesn't own the intelligence to come up with anything better.

    You have to realize that during his entire life, people have told Jolly
    Roger that he was stupid - but here - in Apple lala land, Jolly Roger can
    bully even the most intelligent of people. He _loves_ bullying people.

    Bullying is the only thing that makes Jolly Roger feel good about himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Wed Apr 24 14:35:28 2024
    On 2024-04-24, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-04-23, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2024-04-23 09:36, Jörg Lorenz wrote:

    QED: You are Troll. A brain dead Troll not willing to contribute a
    constructive opinion.

    By replying to it, you oxygenate it.

    "it"? My, you sure are feeling superior today, aren't you?

    Touched a nerve? You trolls are thin-skinned losers.

    In these days of pronouns, I prefer to be referred to as “he” or “him”. If
    he doesn’t comply to my preferred pronouns I will report him to Tim Cook, who will then surely have his army of social warriors remove all emojis
    from Alan Browne’s keyboards.

    See?

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)