• Re: iPhone survives 16,000-foot drop

    From Larry Wolff@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Mon Jan 8 15:35:09 2024
    On 1/8/2024 6:51 PM, badgolferman wrote:

    While Apple claims the Ceramic Shield technology brings the
    toughest screen to a smartphone

    It's still glass no matter what fancy brand name they concoct for it.

    I'm sure the company hasn't tested
    that many 16,000-foot drops.

    Terminal velocity + soft landings = people survived falling over six miles https://www.statista.com/chart/19708/known-occasions-where-people-survived-falls/

    Terminal velocity of a human is around 120mph (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_skydiving)

    In addition, the phone possibly landed on
    grass, which helped soften the fall.

    A phone? About 40mph (but the test phone was dropped onto a hard surface) (https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/6813341/Terminal_Velocity_of_Phone__Rev3.0.pdf)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Mon Jan 8 23:03:09 2024
    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, one of Alaska Airlines’ planes had a window and fuselage
    blew out midair, forcing an emergency landing. Despite the shock, no
    one got hurt. While the story itself is incredible, a post on X
    (formerly known as Twitter) has gone viral as an iPhone from this plane
    was found intact on a road near Beaverton, Oregon.

    According to Seanathan Bates, he found an iPhone from the Alaska
    Airlines flight on the side of the road. It was still in Airplane Mode
    with half a battery and open to a baggage claim for this flight. The
    iPhone, which had a case and screen protector, was intact after a
    16,000-foot drop.

    Interestingly, while the case and the screen protector look as good as
    new, there was just a tiny issue: A broken-off charger plug still
    inside it. But despite that, everything seemed to be working just fine. Another X user posted where the airplane was when its panel blew out
    and where the iPhone was later found.

    The image seems to imply the person who lost the iPhone after the
    Alaska Airlines incident had an iPhone 14 Pro or one of the iPhone 15
    models. While Apple claims the Ceramic Shield technology brings the
    toughest screen to a smartphone, I’m sure the company hasn’t tested
    that many 16,000-foot drops. In addition, the phone possibly landed on
    grass, which helped soften the fall.

    https://bgr.com/tech/iphone-survives-16000-foot-drop-after-alaska-airlines-1282-panel-blows-out-mid-flight/

    Just shows the skullduggery of Apple marketing that Apple never tests their phones by dropping them from 16000 feet from an airplane. The charger plug broke off. Full stop.

    Yet the iKooks like nospam and Jolly Roger will still tout the indestructibility of iPhones because they are far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger graphs and part of the peak of the scientifically
    irrefutable Mount Stupid. I have a lot of books and too much time for
    usenet rants.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Larry Wolff@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon Jan 8 21:07:15 2024
    On 1/8/2024 7:24 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:

    It's still glass no matter what fancy brand name they concoct for it.

    Ah, so is all glass the same?

    The results would have been the same no matter what phone it was.
    And all the trade names in the world doesn't make glass not glass.

    Even people have survived falling from taller than Mount Everest.
    If they land in a soft spot (as terminal velocity is all that matters).

    If you don't even understand glass, you probably don't know what that means which is that any phone that finds a soft spot to land will easily survive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Larry Wolff on Tue Jan 9 01:24:47 2024
    On 2024-01-08, Larry Wolff <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:
    On 1/8/2024 6:51 PM, badgolferman wrote:

    While Apple claims the Ceramic Shield technology brings the
    toughest screen to a smartphone

    It's still glass no matter what fancy brand name they concoct for it.

    Ah, so is all glass the same?

    You must be fun at parties.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to ecphoric@allspamis.invalid on Tue Jan 9 01:26:07 2024
    On 2024-01-08, *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, one of Alaska Airlines’ planes had a window and fuselage
    blew out midair, forcing an emergency landing. Despite the shock, no
    one got hurt. While the story itself is incredible, a post on X
    (formerly known as Twitter) has gone viral as an iPhone from this
    plane was found intact on a road near Beaverton, Oregon.

    According to Seanathan Bates, he found an iPhone from the Alaska
    Airlines flight on the side of the road. It was still in Airplane
    Mode with half a battery and open to a baggage claim for this flight.
    The iPhone, which had a case and screen protector, was intact after a
    16,000-foot drop.

    Interestingly, while the case and the screen protector look as good
    as new, there was just a tiny issue: A broken-off charger plug still
    inside it. But despite that, everything seemed to be working just
    fine. Another X user posted where the airplane was when its panel
    blew out and where the iPhone was later found.

    The image seems to imply the person who lost the iPhone after the
    Alaska Airlines incident had an iPhone 14 Pro or one of the iPhone 15
    models. While Apple claims the Ceramic Shield technology brings the
    toughest screen to a smartphone, I’m sure the company hasn’t tested
    that many 16,000-foot drops. In addition, the phone possibly landed
    on grass, which helped soften the fall.

    https://bgr.com/tech/iphone-survives-16000-foot-drop-after-alaska-airlines-1282-panel-blows-out-mid-flight/

    Just shows the skullduggery of Apple marketing that Apple never tests
    their phones by dropping them from 16000 feet from an airplane. The
    charger plug broke off. Full stop.

    Yet the iKooks like nospam and Jolly Roger will still tout the indestructibility of iPhones because they are far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger graphs and part of the peak of the scientifically
    irrefutable Mount Stupid. I have a lot of books and too much time for
    usenet rants.

    Nice. 🤣

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Larry Wolff on Tue Jan 9 03:03:13 2024
    On 2024-01-09, Larry Wolff <larrywolff@larrywolff.net> wrote:
    On 1/8/2024 7:24 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:

    It's still glass no matter what fancy brand name they concoct for
    it.

    Ah, so is all glass the same?

    The results would have been the same no matter what phone it was.

    Well not necessarily considering the impact angle, velocity, and surface wouldn't be the same.

    And all the trade names in the world doesn't make glass not glass.

    Nobody here (except you) is making that claim - least of all Apple.

    you don't even understand glass

    Sure, pumpkin.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 9 18:41:27 2024
    On 2024-01-08 18:03, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, one of Alaska Airlines’ planes had a window and fuselage
    blew out midair, forcing an emergency landing. Despite the shock, no
    one got hurt. While the story itself is incredible, a post on X
    (formerly known as Twitter) has gone viral as an iPhone from this plane
    was found intact on a road near Beaverton, Oregon.

    According to Seanathan Bates, he found an iPhone from the Alaska
    Airlines flight on the side of the road. It was still in Airplane Mode
    with half a battery and open to a baggage claim for this flight. The
    iPhone, which had a case and screen protector, was intact after a
    16,000-foot drop.

    Interestingly, while the case and the screen protector look as good as
    new, there was just a tiny issue: A broken-off charger plug still
    inside it. But despite that, everything seemed to be working just fine.
    Another X user posted where the airplane was when its panel blew out
    and where the iPhone was later found.

    The image seems to imply the person who lost the iPhone after the
    Alaska Airlines incident had an iPhone 14 Pro or one of the iPhone 15
    models. While Apple claims the Ceramic Shield technology brings the
    toughest screen to a smartphone, I’m sure the company hasn’t tested
    that many 16,000-foot drops. In addition, the phone possibly landed on
    grass, which helped soften the fall.

    https://bgr.com/tech/iphone-survives-16000-foot-drop-after-alaska-airlines-1282-panel-blows-out-mid-flight/

    Just shows the skullduggery of Apple marketing that Apple never tests their phones by dropping them from 16000 feet from an airplane. The charger plug broke off. Full stop.

    Yet the iKooks like nospam and Jolly Roger will still tout the indestructibility of iPhones because they are far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger graphs and part of the peak of the scientifically
    irrefutable Mount Stupid. I have a lot of books and too much time for
    usenet rants.

    Cute.


    --
    “Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
    - John Maynard Keynes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)