• Facial recognition allows crooks to steal money from financial accounts

    From Jim S@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 04:22:12 2023
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial recognition
    technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?
    --
    Jim S

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Jim S on Mon Apr 3 08:55:48 2023
    Jim S <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial recognition
    technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?

    Probably used the victim's face while drugged up to reset FaceID to the attacker's face instead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Jim S on Mon Apr 3 09:29:24 2023
    On 2023-04-03 00:22, Jim S wrote:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial recognition
    technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?

    First off it's not even clear that facial recognition was used. It's a
    claim by the family.

    It's plausible that they used the feature, and as Chris points out, then
    used it to "authorize" the phone with someone else's face.

    Lastly, it's not clear what kind of phone was used.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Mon Apr 3 16:45:44 2023
    On 2023-04-03, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jim S <jim@jimXscott.co.uk> wrote:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that
    money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial
    recognition technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?

    Probably used the victim's face while drugged up to reset FaceID to
    the attacker's face instead.

    That's what I suspect as well.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Mon Apr 3 16:30:20 2023
    On 2023-04-03, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-03 00:22, Jim S wrote:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that
    money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial
    recognition technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?

    First off it's not even clear that facial recognition was used. It's
    a claim by the family.

    It's plausible that they used the feature, and as Chris points out,
    then used it to "authorize" the phone with someone else's face.

    It's possible they simply had the victims unlock their devices with
    their faces during their drug-and-alcohol-induced stupor before losing consciousness.

    Lastly, it's not clear what kind of phone was used.

    Interestingly, this wasn't cross-posted to the Android newsgroup.
    Hmmm... ; )

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Mon Apr 3 15:00:26 2023
    On 2023-04-03 14:23, Chris wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-03, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    Lastly, it's not clear what kind of phone was used.

    Interestingly, this wasn't cross-posted to the Android newsgroup.
    Hmmm... ; )

    Everyone knows it's trivial to circumvent any facial recognition on Android :p

    It is. When my son showed me the feature on his Android phone, I pulled
    up a photo of him on my phone and promptly unlocked his phone with it.

    To be fair, this was a very early implementation of such - about 10
    years ago. not sure if the Android stuff has improved (I believe it's manufacturer specific too...).

    Anyway, his brief crossover to Android was short lived.

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon Apr 3 18:23:58 2023
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-03, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-03 00:22, Jim S wrote:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that
    money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial
    recognition technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?

    First off it's not even clear that facial recognition was used. It's
    a claim by the family.

    It's plausible that they used the feature, and as Chris points out,
    then used it to "authorize" the phone with someone else's face.

    It's possible they simply had the victims unlock their devices with
    their faces during their drug-and-alcohol-induced stupor before losing consciousness.

    Lastly, it's not clear what kind of phone was used.

    Interestingly, this wasn't cross-posted to the Android newsgroup.
    Hmmm... ; )

    Everyone knows it's trivial to circumvent any facial recognition on Android
    :p

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon Apr 3 14:57:25 2023
    On 2023-04-03 12:30, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2023-04-03, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-04-03 00:22, Jim S wrote:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/02/nyregion/manhattan-gay-bars-drugging-murders.html

    The families of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger also discovered that
    money had been taken from their financial accounts, using facial
    recognition technology on their phones.

    How do you think it happened?

    First off it's not even clear that facial recognition was used. It's
    a claim by the family.

    It's plausible that they used the feature, and as Chris points out,
    then used it to "authorize" the phone with someone else's face.

    It's possible they simply had the victims unlock their devices with
    their faces during their drug-and-alcohol-induced stupor before losing consciousness.

    Yep - considered that too.


    Lastly, it's not clear what kind of phone was used.

    Interestingly, this wasn't cross-posted to the Android newsgroup.
    Hmmm... ; )

    Oh C'mon - that's just paranoid!

    --
    “Donald Trump and his allies and supporters are a clear and present
    danger to American democracy.”
    - J Michael Luttig - 2022-06-16
    - Former US appellate court judge (R) testifying to the January 6
    committee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 3 14:33:33 2023
    In article <u0f5ju$32etu$1@dont-email.me>, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
    wrote:


    Lastly, it's not clear what kind of phone was used.

    Interestingly, this wasn't cross-posted to the Android newsgroup.
    Hmmm... ; )

    Everyone knows it's trivial to circumvent any facial recognition on Android

    it is, other than the pixel 4

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nospam@21:1/5 to bitbucket@blackhole.com on Mon Apr 3 15:15:26 2023
    In article <enFWL.2012458$9sn9.789032@fx17.iad>, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:


    Everyone knows it's trivial to circumvent any facial recognition on Android :p

    It is. When my son showed me the feature on his Android phone, I pulled
    up a photo of him on my phone and promptly unlocked his phone with it.

    To be fair, this was a very early implementation of such - about 10
    years ago. not sure if the Android stuff has improved (I believe it's manufacturer specific too...).

    it hasn't.

    the only exception is the pixel 4, which used the same technology as
    apple's face id.

    for reasons known only to google, they went back to fingerprints in the
    pixel 5.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)