• The Tragic Absurdity of Bidens Gaza Policies

    From NefeshBarYochai@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 29 00:44:34 2024
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism
    XPost: alt.education-higher

    by JACK MIRKINSON

    Since Israels campaign of death began, President Joe Biden has
    perfected the art of cognitive dissonance, planting story after story
    about his ever-increasing frustration with Israeli Prime Minister
    Benjamin Netanyahu while continuing to send Israel the bombs it is
    using against the people of Gaza. But the past seven days have taken
    this absurdity to new levels. Thats because this was the week when we
    saw both Bidens most dramatic attempts to appear to be radically
    shifting his approach and the most dramatic evidence of just how
    deeply the United States is helping to perpetuate this war.

    First, the attempts to telegraph that change is happening: Biden used
    his State of the Union address to announce that the United States
    would be building a pier off the Gaza coast so that it could deliver
    aid to the millions of people who are either being massacred or left
    to starve to death due to Israels unceasing bombardment and total
    siege of the region. He was then filmed telling Senator Michael Bennet
    that he was going to have a come to Jesus meeting with Netanyahu,
    though he immediately undercut the seemingly accidental nature of the
    broadcast by adding, Im on a hot mic here. Good.

    On Saturday, Biden went further, telling MSNBCs Jonathan Capehart
    that Netanyahu was hurting Israel more than helping Israel and that
    an Israeli invasion of the southern Gaza city of Rafah, where 1.4
    million Palestinians are trapped, would be a red line. All of this
    was enough to prompt some of the White Houses more sycophantic
    chroniclers, such as Axios reporter Barak Ravid, to proclaim that
    Biden was breaking with Netanyahu.

    And its true that these moves could seem like an encouraging signal
    about his willingness to put some kind of pressure on Israel.

    But wait, whats that sound? That would be the other shoe dropping.
    The most important news about the American handling of the war in the
    past week could be found not in any of the aforementioned, highly
    choreographed moments, but in a pair of reports on Tuesday in The
    Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, in which the outlets
    revealed that not only has the United States been transferring vast
    amounts of weapons to Israel, but that it has been doing so in a way deliberately designed to evade public scrutiny.

    According to the reports, the US has approved more than 100 arms sales
    to Israel since October 7, constituting what the Journal called tens
    of thousands of weapons. But the Biden administration has revealed
    only two of those deals to Congress. The rest have been masked by one
    of the oldest shady financial tricks in the books, as the Post
    explained:

    [Th]e weapons transfers were processed without any public debate
    because each fell under a specific dollar amount that requires the
    executive branch to individually notify Congress, according to U.S.
    officials and lawmakers who, like others, spoke on the condition of
    anonymity to discuss a sensitive military matter.

    [] Thats an extraordinary number of sales over the course of a
    pretty short amount of time, which really strongly suggests that the
    Israeli campaign would not be sustainable without this level of U.S.
    support, said Jeremy Konyndyk, a former senior Biden administration
    official and current president of Refugees International.

    So lets recap. Biden is publicly lamenting the scale of death in
    Gaza, going after Netanyahu, and pledging to build a maritime aid
    corridor to get around Israels siege. But Netanyahus ability to
    carry out that level of carnage, and impose such an inhumane siege, is dependent on the continued flow of weapons to Israel from the
    government headed by Biden. Or, to put it more succinctly: The US
    government is now making elaborate plans to ameliorate a humanitarian catastrophe that would not exist without its own bombs.

    When you add the fact that Bidens government is not only sending
    Israel weapons but is so eager to do so that it is purposefully
    skirting congressional oversight and public accountability, it all
    gets even more ludicrous. Were no longer in a simple this makes no
    sense situation. Instead, weve arrived at a Twilight Zone if I try
    to rationalize this, it will tear a hole in the fabric of space and
    time situation. Its as if you kept secretly handing an arsonist
    gasoline and matches, then showed up five minutes later with the
    firefighters, read out a statement about how unconscionable arson is,
    and announced that you were taking major steps to help the survivors.

    Things get more maddening when you look at the nature of the American
    aid effort. That pier Biden announced? The Pentagon says it could take
    up to two months to build. There is a famine happening right now in
    Gaza, not two months from now. And the US wont even give assurances
    that Israel will be prevented from firing on Palestinians trying to
    retrieve American aid. There are other agencies on the ground, but the
    US is in the way there too. It has cut off funding to UNWRA, the main
    relief organization in Gaza, on dubious evidence that the UN now
    claims was based in part on evidence obtained through torture.

    These loopholes and contradictions have become so glaring that people
    you might normally expect to overlook them are unable to. A recent
    report in The New York Times, for instance, delicately noted that the
    United States finds itself on both sides of the war in a way, arming
    the Israelis while trying to care for those hurt as a result. And
    Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen told The New Yorker, I really
    havent heard a good response to the question of why we should not
    apply existing U.S. lawto insure that U.S. military assistance is
    used in accordance with our values.

    Nobody has heard a good responseand thats because there isnt one!
    Its shameless hypocrisy from Biden all the way down.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dolf@21:1/5 to NefeshBarYochai on Fri Mar 29 01:31:42 2024
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism
    XPost: alt.education-higher

    Given the biblical text: "NOW WHEN JESUS WAS BORN IN BETHLEHEM OF *JUDAEA*-G2449 IN THE DAYS OF HEROD THE KING, BEHOLD, THERE CAME WISE MEN
    FROM THE EAST TO JERUSALEM, SAYING, WHERE IS HE THAT IS BORN KING OF THE
    JEWS?

    FOR WE HAVE SEEN HIS STAR IN THE EAST, AND ARE COME TO WORSHIP HIM:

    WHEN HEROD THE KING HAD HEARD THESE THINGS, HE WAS TROUBLED, AND ALL
    JERUSALEM WITH HIM." [Matthew 2:1-3]

    #496 as [#10, #70, #400, #4, #1, #10, #1] = Ioudaía (G2449): {UMBRA: #496 % #41 = #4} 0) *JUDAEA* = 'he shall be praised'; 1) in a narrower sense, to
    the southern portion of Palestine lying on this side of the Jordan and the
    Dead Sea, to distinguish it from Samaria, Galilee, Peraea, and Idumaea; 2)
    *IN* *A* *BROADER* *SENSE*, *REFERRING* *TO* *ALL* *PALESTINE*;

    From what year as anchor in history is your objection made?

    Does such standing constitute historical revisionism?

    The absence of answers implies that it's a blasphemy for ISLAM to make any prerogative claim to the CELESTIAL HIERARCHY ANCHORED FROM 1 AD AS 19 YEAR LUNAR METONIC CYCLE / TROPICAL YEAR -- SUCH AS THE POPE WELL KNOWS IS A SECTARIAN / SECULAR CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY GIVEN THE LUNAR GRAND INCEPTION
    OF 21 DECEMBER 104 BCE / 2025.

    Because the biblical text suggests that in 4 BCE as before any colonial
    mindset of ISLAM, the notion of JUDAEA included ALL PALESTINE even when it
    was a vassal sovereignty under ROMAN RULE and known to the ARABIC worldview
    as such) the PALESTINIAN PROTESTORS are not only anti-Christ as KING OF THE JEWS but antagonistic towards democracy.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/x-files/Lawyer%20Notes%2020240320%20%28public%29.pdf>

    NefeshBarYochai <void@invalid.noy> wrote:
    by JACK MIRKINSON

    Since Israel’s campaign of death began, President Joe Biden has
    perfected the art of cognitive dissonance, planting story after story
    about his ever-increasing “frustration” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu while continuing to send Israel the bombs it is
    using against the people of Gaza. But the past seven days have taken
    this absurdity to new levels. That’s because this was the week when we
    saw both Biden’s most dramatic attempts to appear to be radically
    shifting his approach and the most dramatic evidence of just how
    deeply the United States is helping to perpetuate this war.

    First, the attempts to telegraph that change is happening: Biden used
    his State of the Union address to announce that the United States
    would be building a pier off the Gaza coast so that it could deliver
    aid to the millions of people who are either being massacred or left
    to starve to death due to Israel’s unceasing bombardment and total
    siege of the region. He was then filmed telling Senator Michael Bennet
    that he was going to have a “come to Jesus meeting” with Netanyahu,
    though he immediately undercut the seemingly accidental nature of the broadcast by adding, “I’m on a hot mic here. Good.”

    On Saturday, Biden went further, telling MSNBC’s Jonathan Capehart
    that Netanyahu was “hurting Israel more than helping Israel” and that
    an Israeli invasion of the southern Gaza city of Rafah, where 1.4
    million Palestinians are trapped, would be a “red line.” All of this
    was enough to prompt some of the White House’s more sycophantic
    chroniclers, such as Axios reporter Barak Ravid, to proclaim that
    Biden was “breaking” with Netanyahu.

    And it’s true that these moves could seem like an encouraging signal
    about his willingness to put some kind of pressure on Israel.

    But wait, what’s that sound? That would be the other shoe dropping.
    The most important news about the American handling of the war in the
    past week could be found not in any of the aforementioned, highly choreographed moments, but in a pair of reports on Tuesday in The
    Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal, in which the outlets
    revealed that not only has the United States been transferring vast
    amounts of weapons to Israel, but that it has been doing so in a way deliberately designed to evade public scrutiny.

    According to the reports, the US has approved more than 100 arms sales
    to Israel since October 7, constituting what the Journal called “tens
    of thousands” of weapons. But the Biden administration has revealed
    only two of those deals to Congress. The rest have been masked by one
    of the oldest shady financial tricks in the books, as the Post
    explained:

    [Th]e weapons transfers were processed without any public debate
    because each fell under a specific dollar amount that requires the
    executive branch to individually notify Congress, according to U.S.
    officials and lawmakers who, like others, spoke on the condition of
    anonymity to discuss a sensitive military matter.

    […] “That’s an extraordinary number of sales over the course of a
    pretty short amount of time, which really strongly suggests that the
    Israeli campaign would not be sustainable without this level of U.S. support,” said Jeremy Konyndyk, a former senior Biden administration official and current president of Refugees International.

    So let’s recap. Biden is publicly lamenting the scale of death in
    Gaza, going after Netanyahu, and pledging to build a maritime aid
    corridor to get around Israel’s siege. But Netanyahu’s ability to
    carry out that level of carnage, and impose such an inhumane siege, is dependent on the continued flow of weapons to Israel from the
    government headed by… Biden. Or, to put it more succinctly: The US government is now making elaborate plans to ameliorate a humanitarian catastrophe that would not exist without its own bombs.

    When you add the fact that Biden’s government is not only sending
    Israel weapons but is so eager to do so that it is purposefully
    skirting congressional oversight and public accountability, it all
    gets even more ludicrous. We’re no longer in a simple “this makes no sense” situation. Instead, we’ve arrived at a Twilight Zone “if I try
    to rationalize this, it will tear a hole in the fabric of space and
    time” situation. It’s as if you kept secretly handing an arsonist
    gasoline and matches, then showed up five minutes later with the firefighters, read out a statement about how unconscionable arson is,
    and announced that you were taking major steps to help the survivors.

    Things get more maddening when you look at the nature of the American
    aid effort. That pier Biden announced? The Pentagon says it could take
    up to two months to build. There is a famine happening right now in
    Gaza, not two months from now. And the US won’t even give assurances
    that Israel will be prevented from firing on Palestinians trying to
    retrieve American aid. There are other agencies on the ground, but the
    US is in the way there too. It has cut off funding to UNWRA, the main
    relief organization in Gaza, on dubious evidence that the UN now
    claims was based in part on evidence obtained through torture.

    These loopholes and contradictions have become so glaring that people
    you might normally expect to overlook them are unable to. A recent
    report in The New York Times, for instance, delicately noted that “the United States finds itself on both sides of the war in a way, arming
    the Israelis while trying to care for those hurt as a result.” And Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen told The New Yorker, “I really
    haven’t heard a good response to the question of why we should not
    apply existing U.S. law…to insure that U.S. military assistance is
    used in accordance with our values.”

    Nobody has heard a good response—and that’s because there isn’t one!
    It’s shameless hypocrisy from Biden all the way down.




    X-FILES (@GuardianAus) @ 1501 HRS ON 28 MARCH 2024: "RAAF CHAPLAINCY
    CULTURE A ‘WOLF PACK’, SAYS WHISTLEBLOWER WHO FOUGHT FOR YEARS TO CLEAR HIS NAME:

    <https://x.com/guardianaus/status/1773198722715004955>

    A US marine who became a Catholic lay chaplain, Johns joined the Royal Australian Air Force with his wife, Jean, in 2008 from Canada, where they
    had also worked in military pastoral care. There they had advocated for Canadian soldiers deployed in Afghanistan who believed they were being
    ordered to ignore the alleged abuse of young boys by local men.

    In 2010 he raised concerns within the RAAF about the alleged actions of a fellow chaplain deployed in the Middle East. The allegations were examined
    but he alleges key witnesses were not interviewed. He was never told the result.

    Johns then approached his federal MP, pressing for an inquiry into the
    handling of his report.

    The then defence minister, Stephen Smith, ordered an inquiry in 2011.

    It found the handling “somewhat clumsy” but said the chaplaincy branch had acted “in good faith”, afforded Johns procedural fairness and upheld Defence policy. It made no criticism of Johns for his original report.

    “On the contrary, it is clear that, as a result of you bringing these allegations to light, more can be done to facilitate the complaints process where a genuine concern about the behaviour of a chaplain is held,” the report said.

    Despite this, damaging rumours about him began to spread through the chaplaincy.
    In 2017 he wrote to the then defence force chief, Air Marshal Mark Binskin.

    “Your account of the lack of support provided to you in the wake of
    reporting the unacceptable behaviour is disappointing,” Binskin wrote in reply, praising Johns’ integrity and calling him a highly regarded role model.

    Johns was assured his complaint about how he had been treated was being investigated and he would be debriefed. Neither occurred. In 2018 he
    complained about what he alleged was “intimidatory” correspondence from a senior chaplain. An examination found against him.

    Johns then wrote to Binskin’s successor, Gen Angus Campbell, who ordered
    the inspector general of the Australian defence force to investigate his treatment. Johns said its report endorsed his actions in raising his
    original concerns. But he was prevented from revealing its contents.

    “In October of 2020, I finally get all the answers to all my questions,” Johns recounted. “I can’t say what they are, but … I was gobsmacked.”

    Johns said the years of stress had tested, though not broken, his faith in
    God. But it had destroyed his faith in military chaplains.

    “I don’t trust chaplains,” he said. “I particularly don’t trust chaplains
    who are in leadership – who wear rank. Categorically, I don’t.”

    The former air force chaplain [had] fought for a decade to clear his name
    after being obstructed and smeared for trying to report serious allegations about a colleague’s behaviour has spoken out about his treatment for the first time, describing the chaplaincy culture as a “wolf pack”.

    Ahead of Thursday’s final hearing of the royal commission into defence and veteran suicide, Joe Johns told Guardian Australia about his years-long experience after he tried in 2010 to report allegations about another male chaplain’s behaviour – particularly with women – on operations in the Middle East.

    Johns, who gave evidence to the royal commission in a private session, said after he had tried to report alleged sexual harassment and irregular
    behaviour, the chaplaincy closed ranks and turned on him, trashing his reputation and seriously damaging his health. At least one other chaplain outlined a similar experience to the royal commission.

    “What makes this the most critical and most concerning is these are people who are supposed to be the kindest, the best, the most ethical, the most caring, the go-to people when you are in trouble,” Johns said this week. “And they’re not. They’re a wolf pack.” <https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/28/raaf-chaplain-culture-joe-johns-royal-commission-defence-veteran-suicide>

    TWEET:

    WOLF PACK?

    There is an implicit BOER WAR MEMORIAL ANTAGONISM by ROMAN CATHOLICISM
    directed towards the COMMONWEALTH (CAESAROPAPISM), given that EASTER SUNDAY occurs between the TETRA / RANGE Sunday dates #21 - 22 MARCH through #28 - ANZAC DAY: 25 APRIL (whereas PENTECOST SUNDAY as 49 days thereafter occurs within Sunday ranges #31 - 10 MAY through #39 - 13 JUNE) within the
    Gregorian calendar and may be the 81st through 115th day of common years or 82nd through 116th day of leap years.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Liturgical%20Calendar%202004-2040.pdf>

    PENTECOST SUNDAY AS JUPITER (#38 - SATOR / #33 - TENET (#33 ... #1933 -
    metonic cycle) / #34 - ROTAS) PRINCIPLE

    [#38 - 8 JUNE 1930, #35 - 24 MAY 1931, #33 - 15 MAY 1932, #37 - 4 JUNE
    1933, #34 - 20 MAY 1934]

    [#38 - 8 JUNE 2014, #35 - 24 MAY 2015, #33 - 15 MAY 2016, #37 - 4 JUNE 2017 [🎯], #34 - 20 MAY 2018]

    [#38 - 8 JUNE 2025, #35 - 24 MAY 2026, #33 - 16 MAY 2027, #37 - 4 JUNE
    2028, #34 - 20 MAY 2029]

    Note that this #38 - SATOR (#249) / #33 - TENET (#205) / #34 - ROTAS (#161) PAGAN PRIESTLY CYCLE (ie. the JEWISH / CHRISTIAN cycle is 24x7x13 = 6 x
    #364 days x 49 = 6J as 293 x 365.2423 tropical year) TO WHICH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS EMBODIMENT is then contextually relevant to the Reichskonkordat.

    Which ignores the historical precedents (ie. ROMAN CASE LAW BY DECREE OF
    CAESAR CLAUDIUS DATED 10 NOVEMBER 41 AD: “… not be disrespectful of the customs used in the ritual of their GOD, but let [the Jews] USE THEIR
    CUSTOMS AS IN THE TIME OF THE GOD AUGUSTUS [#38, #71, #14], even as I
    myself, after hearing both sides, have confirmed.”)

    In Spring 44 AD, during the Feast of Unleavened Bread, King Herod Agrippa I
    had Peter arrested and imprisoned during such time such APOSTLE was still observing JEWISH CUSTOMS of PASSOVER (1 to 5 APRIL #33 AD): "AND BECAUSE HE
    SAW IT PLEASED THE JEWS, HE PROCEEDED FURTHER TO TAKE PETER ALSO. (THEN
    WERE THE DAYS OF UNLEAVENED BREAD.)" [Acts 12:3 (KJV)]

    THE ABOMINATION OF DESOLATION WHICH YOU CALL EASTER IS A CHRISTIAN FICTION
    AND IS MORE PROPERLY A PAGAN PRIESTLY #249 - SATOR (#38) / #205 - TENET
    (#33) / #161 - ROTAS (#34) CYCLE RITUAL WHICH UNDENIABLY IS BABYLONIAN
    WHOREDOM [Revelation 17:5]

    LUOSHU ORDER [5x5 CENTRE] #369 MATRIX REFERENCE OBJECT

    49 72 9 54 65
    12 32 77 14 34
    57 23 41 59 25
    48 68 5 50 70
    17 28 73 10 33

    32 77 14
    23 41 59
    68 5 50

    5
    37
    96
    110

    REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS IDEA #110 - 16 JANUARY 1942: "[Dietrich] Eckart introduced me to the Büchners: "This is my young friend, Herr *WOLF*."
    Nobody could think of forming any connection between this person and that
    crazy monster Adolf Hitler. Eckart was known at the boarding-house under
    the name of Dr. Hoffmann. At midday he took me to the Türken inn, promising
    me a genuine goulash. He was addressed there as "Herr Doktor", but I saw at once that everybody knew his real identity." [pages 212]

    Eckart was a participant in the failed Beer Hall Putsch in 1923 and died
    from a heart attack on 26 December of that year, shortly after his release
    from Landsberg Prison. He was elevated to the status of a major thinker
    upon the establishment of Nazi Germany in 1933. He was acknowledged by
    Hitler to be the spiritual co-founder of Nazism and "a guiding light of the early National Socialist movement."

    #33 - TENET OF BELIEF / LUO SHU REFERENCE OBJECT: #205 = [#57, #23, #41,
    #59, #25] / [#9, #77, #41, #5, #75] AS ITS AESTHETIC PRINCIPLE OF
    PERSISTENCE: In the circumstance of PYTHAGOREAN #135 / #405 / #540 / #1080
    - HETEROS BIPARTITE NUMBER paradigm equivalence (ie. NAZISM is a faith
    without RITUAL and CATHOLICISM / AUSTRALIAN ANGLICANS as a DOGMA of inconsequential RITUAL) given the year 1939 of WWII commencement was a
    lunar metonic 19 year cycle anchored to 1 AD that similarly purveys a
    supernal construct of conformity to COGITO: #40 - LAW / MODEL (FA) - 𝌭法 = #491 / [#7, #78, #35, #80, #10] as RANGE: noon 15 to 19 JUNE which it
    alluded to as a transcendent IDEAL.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/x-files/Lawyer%20Notes%2020240320%20%28public%29.pdf>

    2ND TWEET:

    NO GIRLS A DOUBLE ENTENDRE IS NOT AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ADULT SERVICES AS
    EASTER PROMOTION AND YOU WILL BE BLOCKED (like 100's prior) FOR BEING SACRILEGIOUS

    Whilst the news of the week has been AFL recreational drug testing rorts
    and a failure to convey any truth about their alleged groin injuries.

    Such pales into insignificance concerning the 90 years of sycophantic lip
    👄 service which the Anglican Church has given to the British monarchy.

    Speaking of an implied affable avoidance of injury: "In his first public message since his cancer diagnosis, King Charles III reaffirmed his
    Coronation pledge “not to be served but to serve”, and called on people to “prioritise care and friendship”. [courtesy: Sky News]

    Compare sacrilege, Latin sacrilegus. From Latin sacer + legō (“steal something sacred”).

    sacer (feminine sacra, neuter sacrum, superlative sacerrimus); first/second-declension adjective (nominative masculine singular in -er)

    sacred, holy, dedicated (to a divinity), consecrated, hallowed (translating Greek ἱερός)
    devoted (to a divinity for sacrifice), fated (to destruction), forfeited, accursed
    divine, celestial
    (only poetic and in post-Augustan prose) execrable, detestable, horrible, infamous; criminal, impious, wicked, abominable, cursed

    From Proto-Italic *legō, from Proto-Indo-European *léǵ-e-ti, from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ-. Cognates include Ancient Greek λέγω (légō, “I
    speak, I choose, I mean”) and Albanian mbledh. May be related to lēx.

    to choose, select
    to appoint distribuō, attribuō, discrībō, addīcō
    to collect, gather, bring together
    to take out, pick out, extract, remove
    to take to one's self unjustly, carry off, steal, purloin, plunder,
    abstract

    #385 as [#10, #5, #100, #70, #200] = hierós (G2413): {UMBRA: #385 % #41 =
    #16} 1) sacred, consecrated to the deity, pertaining to God; 1a) sacred Scriptures, because inspired by God, treating of divine things and
    therefore to be devoutly revered;

    #62 - 𝍃疑 = #513
    COGITO: [#35, #48, #25, #33, #33] as #62 - DOUBT (YI)
    RANGE: noon 22 to 26 SEPTEMBER

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:62>

    [#35 {@1: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35); Ego: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#35)}
    #48 {@2: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#37); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#83)}
    #25 {@3: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#64); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#108 -
    MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%25})}
    #33 {@4: Sup: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI (#124); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#141
    - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED {%31})}
    #33] {@5: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#136 - MALE DEME IS UNNAMED
    {%36}); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#174)}
    TELOS TOTAL: #174

    DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #385

    #348 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR GOOD FRIDAY 29 MARCH 2024 as [#30, #5,
    #3, #5, #300, #5] = légō (G3004): {UMBRA: #838 % #41 = #18} 1) to say, to speak; 1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to teach; 1c) to exhort, advise, to command, direct; 1d) to point out with words, intend, mean, mean to say;
    1e) to call by name, to call, name; 1f) to speak out, speak of, mention;

    #38 - 𝌫盛 = #489
    COGITO: [#14, #18, #38, #68, #26] as #38 - FULLNESS (SHENG)
    RANGE: noon 06 to 10 JUNE

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Mystery&tetra:38>

    [#14 {@1: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI
    (#14)}
    #18 {@2: Sup: 32 - LEGION: CHUANG (#46); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#32)}
    #38 {@3: Sup: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#116); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#70)}
    #68 {@4: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL
    LUST {%27}); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#138)}
    #26] {@5: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR
    {%22}); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#164)}

    TELOS TOTAL: #164

    ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #348



    --

    Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third party d3 library.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to NefeshBarYochai on Thu Mar 28 20:53:57 2024
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism
    XPost: alt.education-higher

    NefeshBarYochai wrote:
    by JACK MIRKINSON

    Since Israel’s campaign of death began,
    Starting wars often results in a retaliatory campaign of death.

    Ask Germans and Japanese who are old enough to remember the first
    half of the 1940's.


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 29 12:34:24 2024
    XPost: uk.legal, soc.culture.jewish, alt.revisionism
    XPost: alt.education-higher

    Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
    SHEIN:
    On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:53:57 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    Ask Germans and Japanese who are old enough to remember the first
    half of the 1940's.
    No comparison at all. False analogy.
    It is the perfect analogy!


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)