• Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Free Speech and Social Media

    From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 18 10:06:54 2024
    Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Free Speech and Social Media

    The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on Monday on whether the Biden administration violated the First Amendment in combating what it said
    was misinformation on social media platforms.

    It is the latest in an extraordinary series of cases this term
    requiring the justices to assess the meaning of free speech in the
    internet era.

    The case arose from a barrage of communications from administration
    officials urging platforms to take down posts on topics like the
    coronavirus vaccines and claims of election fraud. Last year, a
    federal appeals court severely limited such interactions.

    Alex Abdo, a lawyer with the Knight First Amendment Institute at
    Columbia University, said the Supreme Court's review of that decision
    must be sensitive to two competing values, both vital to democracy.

    "This is an immensely important case that will determine the power of
    the government to pressure the social media platforms into suppressing
    speech," he said. "Our hope is that the Supreme Court will clarify the constitutional line between coercion and persuasion. The government
    has no authority to threaten platforms into censoring protected
    speech, but it must have the ability to participate in public
    discourse so that it can effectively govern and inform the public of
    its views."

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/18/us/supreme-court-social-media#supreme-court-white-house-misinformation

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Mar 18 17:34:17 2024
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:06:54 -0500, JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
    snip
    Social Media

    while social media is moderated and unmoderated usenet newsgroups
    are unmoderated, both are heavily saturated by psyops troll farms

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 18 11:42:03 2024
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:34:17 +0100 (CET), D <J@M> wrote:

    while social media is moderated

    Social media can censor whatever they want to, but moderation depends.

    usenet newsgroups are unmoderated, both are heavily saturated by psyops troll farms

    On this usenet group, trolls will eat Crow, sooner or later.....in the
    time I've been here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Mar 18 18:54:31 2024
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:42:03 -0500, JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:34:17 +0100 (CET), D <J@M> wrote:
    heavily saturated by psyops troll farms

    On this usenet group

    fear merchants . . . every military/industry/congress (kudos ike) are
    entirely populated by them, old timers called this the "mark of cain";
    politics and religion are the worst of all: "do as i say, not as i do"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Mar 18 19:17:07 2024
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, JAB wrote:

    Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Free Speech and Social Media

    The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on Monday on whether the Biden administration violated the First Amendment in combating what it said
    was misinformation on social media platforms.

    It is the latest in an extraordinary series of cases this term
    requiring the justices to assess the meaning of free speech in the
    internet era.

    The case arose from a barrage of communications from administration
    officials urging platforms to take down posts on topics like the
    coronavirus vaccines and claims of election fraud. Last year, a
    federal appeals court severely limited such interactions.

    Alex Abdo, a lawyer with the Knight First Amendment Institute at
    Columbia University, said the Supreme Court's review of that decision
    must be sensitive to two competing values, both vital to democracy.

    "This is an immensely important case that will determine the power of
    the government to pressure the social media platforms into suppressing speech," he said. "Our hope is that the Supreme Court will clarify the constitutional line between coercion and persuasion. The government
    has no authority to threaten platforms into censoring protected
    speech, but it must have the ability to participate in public
    discourse so that it can effectively govern and inform the public of
    its views."

    https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/03/18/us/supreme-court-social-media#supreme-court-white-house-misinformation


    This is very interesting! I like free speech and these are private
    platforms. That being said however, I do recognize how damaging fake news
    can be and that it is a powerful tool for dictators to try and influence elections.

    The trick is to fight that without cracking down on free speech.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Mar 18 19:21:06 2024
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, JAB wrote:

    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 17:34:17 +0100 (CET), D <J@M> wrote:

    while social media is moderated

    Social media can censor whatever they want to, but moderation depends.

    usenet newsgroups are unmoderated, both are heavily saturated by psyops troll farms

    On this usenet group, trolls will eat Crow, sooner or later.....in the
    time I've been here.


    What is the problem with Trolls? If I don't like them I block them. Also,
    I found a usenet law of trolls and that is that the more cross posts, the
    less the value of the message, so I've put in place a filter that deletes
    all messages with more than 3 cross posts. This as done wonders for me
    when it comes to eliminate christian fundamentalists and communists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to adhellman1@gmail.com on Mon Mar 18 21:29:29 2024
    On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 20:17:14 -0400, Auric Hellman
    <adhellman1@gmail.com> wrote:

    Organ Donation is one of the truly rewarding aspects of the medical
    field, and is positively acclaimed by many for the full community input
    into this scientific marvel.

    https://mir-s3-cdn-cf.behance.net/project_modules/disp/b397f819833315.562e10550ea9d.jpg

    https://mir-s3-cdn-cf.behance.net/project_modules/disp/edc8a319833315.562e10557092f.jpg

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to adhellman1@gmail.com on Tue Mar 19 20:43:13 2024
    On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:39:23 -0400, Auric Hellman
    <adhellman1@gmail.com> wrote:

    I have no doubt a few dollars are being skimmed off
    the top in the upper echelons of these organization,

    Obviously the wrong post

    I haven't followed this topic in years, but there is more to this
    story than those profiting...I recall at one point, and maybe now,
    those with the wealth were getting first picks, so to speak.

    When money/goods can be stolen, those motivated in all classes will attempt/accomplish this goal.

    Even US mail carriers have been caught stealing birthday money being
    sent to children.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)