• Not Charged ...

    From Retrograde@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 2 12:10:53 2023
    The news say the indictment mentions but does not charge 6 others. NYT
    points out, by the description of the others you can easily figure out
    they are Rudy "ShitPants" Giuliani, that idiot lawyer Sydney whatever,
    etc.

    I wonder if the DOJ was putting together a more comprehensive indictment
    but suddenly realized they'd better get the cheeto while they can, and
    come back for Shitpants and the rest of them later before the Maga
    nutsos decide to put cheeto back in office or something.

    I sincerely hope Shitpants and Sydney Whatever get their comeuppance
    too. MAGA: making attorneys get attorneys.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to fungus@amongus.com.invalid on Wed Aug 2 10:30:59 2023
    On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:10:53 -0000 (UTC), Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote:

    I wonder if the DOJ was putting together a more comprehensive indictment

    DOJ had not notified them...by US Mail.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to fungus@amongus.com.invalid on Sat Aug 5 10:31:33 2023
    On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 12:10:53 -0000 (UTC), Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote:

    The news say the indictment mentions but does not charge 6 others.
    I wonder if the DOJ was putting together a more comprehensive indictment


    For another, while Mr. Smith described six of Mr. Trump's associates
    as co-conspirators, none were charged. It remains unclear whether some
    of them will eventually be indicted if they do not cooperate, or
    whether he intends to target only Mr. Trump so the case will move
    faster.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/04/us/politics/trump-indictment-jack-smith-charges.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)