Rittenhouse was attacked by 4 people.
He said repeatedly that Rosenbaum and Huber tried to take his gun - so
there is a prima facie claim for using lethal force in self-defense.
Grosskreutz had a gun - so that shooting is a possible self-defense also.
?Rittenhpouse was well-coached to repeat constantly that he feared death or >great bodily harm in those cases.
BUT HE NEVER ONCE SAID THAT HE FEARED DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM from "jump >kick man" - in direct or in cross.
so it was just a non-lethal fight and rittenhouse is clearly guilty of >attempted murder for taking two shots at him at point-blank range !!!
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/kyle-rittenhouse-testimony-during-homicide-trial-transcript-november-10
Rittenhouse was attacked by 4 people.
He said repeatedly that Rosenbaum and Huber tried to take his gun - so there is a prima facie claim for using lethal force in self-defense.
Grosskreutz had a gun - so that shooting is a possible self-defense also.
?Rittenhpouse was well-coached to repeat constantly that he feared death or great bodily harm in those cases.
BUT HE NEVER ONCE SAID THAT HE FEARED DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM from "jump kick man" - in direct or in cross.
so it was just a non-lethal fight and rittenhouse is clearly guilty of attempted murder for taking two shots at him at point-blank range !!!
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/kyle-rittenhouse-testimony-during-homicide-trial-transcript-november-10
There is no requirement for Rittenhouse to say anything. He didn't even
have to testify. His attorney speaks for him as to what his defense is.
I think Wisconsin law requires the government to negate the self defense argument and the prosecutor failed to do that.
The result is not-guilty
On 12/2/2021 4:23 PM, S K wrote:
Rittenhouse was attacked by 4 people.
He said repeatedly that Rosenbaum and Huber tried to take his gun - so there is a prima facie claim for using lethal force in self-defense.
Grosskreutz had a gun - so that shooting is a possible self-defense also.
?Rittenhpouse was well-coached to repeat constantly that he feared death or great bodily harm in those cases.
BUT HE NEVER ONCE SAID THAT HE FEARED DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM from "jump kick man" - in direct or in cross.
so it was just a non-lethal fight and rittenhouse is clearly guilty of attempted murder for taking two shots at him at point-blank range !!!
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/kyle-rittenhouse-testimony-during-homicide-trial-transcript-november-10
He DID testify and HIS LAWYER elicited from him the testimony that he shot two bullets at someone at point blank range and he never once claimed that he feared death or great bodily harm from him when he shot those bullets.
on this count, there was jury nullification and/or incompetence from both the prosecution and the defense.
On 12/3/2021 6:43 AM, S K wrote:
He DID testify and HIS LAWYER elicited from him the testimony that he shot two bullets at someone at point blank range and he never once claimed that he feared death or great bodily harm from him when he shot those bullets.
on this count, there was jury nullification and/or incompetence from both the prosecution and the defense.If the jury believes that a reasonable person would have feared death or severe injury, then no further evidence needs to be submitted. If
somebody kicked me in the head, I would assume I was in danger of being knocked out and subjected to whatever that hyped-up mob might do to me.
I don't think this was jury nullification. As for "incompetence", I
wonder if both sides decided that they
should leave well enough alone on that one.
--
I do so have a memory. It's backed up on DVD... somewhere...
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 418 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 20:03:53 |
Calls: | 8,804 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,304 |
Messages: | 5,969,712 |