permanent residents,people on temporary visas,illegal immigrants?
S K wrote:
permanent residents,people on temporary visas,illegal immigrants?
https://uclawreview.org/2016/10/17/noncitizens-and-the-second-amend
ment
Of much more interest (to a Brit) is the fact that since you can't
own a weapon that fires incendiary rounds in California, there
clearly are *some* limits on keeping and bearing arms possible ...
Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
S K wrote:
permanent residents,people on temporary visas,illegal immigrants?
https://uclawreview.org/2016/10/17/noncitizens-and-the-second-amend
ment
Of much more interest (to a Brit) is the fact that since you can't own
a weapon that fires incendiary rounds in California, there clearly are
*some* limits on keeping and bearing arms possible ...
There are reasonable limits on all Constitutional rights, mostly those
that deal with health and safety.
There are reasonable limits on all Constitutional rights, mostly
those that deal with health and safety.
It may be true what they say about the US grasp of irony :)
OK, I'll bite. Why is banning anything bigger than a .22 not
considered a "reasonable limit" for health and safetys sake ? Or
at the very least a registration scheme for bigger bangs ? (That
is assuming that there is a common agreement that high school
shootings are contrary to the interests of health and safety - it
may be they are considered an extreme practical in some quarters
?????)
permanent residents,people on temporary visas,illegal immigrants?
Jethro_uk <jethro_uk@hotmailbin.com> wrote:
There are reasonable limits on all Constitutional rights, mostly those
that deal with health and safety.
It may be true what they say about the US grasp of irony :)
OK, I'll bite. Why is banning anything bigger than a .22 not considered
a "reasonable limit" for health and safetys sake ? Or at the very least
a registration scheme for bigger bangs ? (That is assuming that there
is a common agreement that high school shootings are contrary to the
interests of health and safety - it may be they are considered an
extreme practical in some quarters ?????)
That has nothing to do with the Constitution. That's just pure
politics.
The Constitution limits what government can do. It doesn't
require the government to do much if anything.
And machine guns have been outlawed since the 30s. /b\
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 374 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 119:18:34 |
| Calls: | 7,953 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 13,008 |
| Messages: | 5,812,027 |