• is judge Kacsmaryk reading person-hood of the fertilized egg in the con

    From S K@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 10 18:27:58 2023
    Apparently he wrote that nothing in the constitution denies protection of life to the fetus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stuart O. Bronstein@21:1/5 to S K on Mon Apr 10 22:38:13 2023
    S K <skpflex1@gmail.com> wrote:

    Apparently he wrote that nothing in the constitution denies
    protection of life to the fetus.

    There was a Supreme Court justice years ago who wrote that telephone
    calls don't merit Fourth Amendment (privacy) protection because the Constitution doesn't say anything about telephones.

    --
    Stu
    http://DownToEarthLawyer.com


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)