XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, nyc.politics, sac.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns

On 28 Nov 2021, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus_schadenfreude@null.net>
posted some news:so1jtu$ejk$46@news.dns-netz.com:

edell@post.com wrote

Put that nigger lawyer in jail.

A former prosecutor for the Manhattan district attorney’s office must
appear for a deposition before the House Judiciary Committee, despite the
DA’s contention that House Republicans are trying to interfere with his investigation into former President Donald Trump.

In a ruling Wednesday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil
sided with the arguments presented by the Rep. Jim Jordan-led committee
that the panel’s subpoena of former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz was lawful
and proper.

“The subpoena was issued with a ‘valid legislative purpose’ in connection
with the ‘broad’ and ‘indispensable’ congressional power to ’conduct investigations,” wrote the judge, who’s a Trump nominee. “Mr. Pomerantz
must appear for the congressional deposition. No one is above the law.”

Bragg filed suit last week in federal court in Manhattan against the
committee and Jordan, R-Ohio, charging that they’re improperly trying to interfere with his prosecution of Trump for political reasons.

Jordan maintained it’s Bragg’s investigation that is politically
motivated. His committee subpoenaed Pomerantz, who’d been involved with
the DA’s investigation into Trump, to testify Thursday.

The judge mocked the DA’s 50-page suit in her ruling, saying, “The first
35 pages of the Complaint have little to do with the subpoena at issue and
are nothing short of a public relations tirade against former President
and current presidential candidate Donald Trump.“

She also took aim at the DA’s contention that the committee was trying to undermine the Trump investigation.

“There is no question that New York, a sovereign state in our federal
system, has authority to enforce its criminal laws through its local prosecutors,” she wrote. “However, the Court rejects the premise that the Committee’s investigation will interfere with DANY’s ongoing prosecution.
The subpoena of Pomerantz, who was a private citizen and public
commentator at the time Bragg indicted Trump, will not prevent or impede
the criminal prosecution that is proceeding in New York state court.”

The judge added she did not care about the political finger-pointing from
both sides in the case.

“The Court does not endorse either side’s agenda. The sole question before
the Court at this time is whether Bragg has a legal basis to quash a congressional subpoena that was issued with a valid legislative purpose.
He does not,” she wrote in her 25-page ruling.

There was no immediate comment from the DA’s office. At a hearing in the
case earlier Wednesday, Bragg’s attorneys indicated that they would ask
the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for a stay if Vyskocil didn’t rule
in their favor.

The appeal was filed early Wednesday evening. Pomerantz appealed as well.

Vyskocil on Wednesday night denied Bragg’s request to pause her order
while he appeals, with the judge saying the DA is “not likely to succeed
on the merits of any appeal.” That means the deposition is likely to take
place Thursday morning as scheduled, unless the appeals court steps in
before then.

A spokesman for Jordan, Russell Dye, said the judge’s earlier “decision
shows that Congress has the ability to conduct oversight and issue
subpoenas to people like Mark Pomerantz, and we look forward to his
deposition before the Judiciary committee.”

Jordan had argued that Pomerantz’s previous role in the DA’s office
leading a probe into Trump’s finances makes him “uniquely situated to
provide information that is relevant and necessary” to his committee’s investigation. He’s also noted that Pomerantz has already divulged
information on the investigation in a book that was published in February,
as well as in media interviews.

Bragg’s suit sought a court order blocking the subpoena to Pomerantz,
calling it an “unprecedently brazen and unconstitutional attack” on an
ongoing investigation.

“Congress has no power to supervise state criminal prosecutions,’” Bragg’s lawyer, Theodore Boutrous, wrote in the lawsuit.

Jordan, who snubbed a subpoena from the Democratically led House Jan. 6 committee last year, argued he’s not trying to interfere with the investigation. He contended that his committee needs the information from Pomerantz, in part, for a “legislative purpose” — a bill that would allow
state criminal cases against former presidents to be moved to federal
court.

Bragg pointed to that proposed legislation as proof that the committee is trying to interfere, because it “would apply to any cases pending at the
time of enactment.”

“The record confirms the purpose of the subpoena is to advance a plan to intimidate, harass, retaliate, and hold ‘accountable’ District Attorney
Bragg for enforcing New York’s criminal law against a then-New Yorker, Mr. Trump,” the DA argued.

“The Congressional Defendants want the District Attorney — an official
endowed with the sovereign authority of the State of New York by its laws
and its people — to bend the knee and to ‘explain to us exactly what he is doing.’”

Bragg, who had instructed Pomerantz not to respond to the committee’s
subpoena, also sued Pomerantz to block his testimony, arguing that the interests and privileges of the DA’s office must be protected.

Pomerantz filed a declaration in court Monday asking the judge to block
the subpoena for his testimony because he’s in an “impossible position.”

"[I]f I refuse to provide information to the Committee, I risk being held
in contempt of Congress and referred to the Department of Justice for
possible criminal prosecution. If, on the other hand, I defy the District Attorney’s instructions and answer questions, I face possible legal or
ethical consequences, including criminal prosecution,” his filing noted.

Pomerantz, who resigned from Bragg’s office in February 2022, also
stressed that he was “not involved in the decision to seek Donald Trump’s indictment on the charges filed against him.”

“I have had no conversations about prosecuting Mr. Trump with the District Attorney or any member of the prosecution team following my resignation,” Pomerantz said.

Jordan held a committee field hearing in Manhattan on Monday to attack
Bragg. It featured victims of violent crime to highlight Republicans’
argument that Bragg has dropped the ball on keeping the public safe to
focus on prosecuting Trump. Bragg’s office has pointed to new data showing crime has significantly fallen in Manhattan during his tenure.

The DA’s office had been investigating Trump for years, before Bragg took office.

Earlier this month, Bragg charged Trump with 34 felony counts of
falsifying business records related to his alleged role in hush money
payments toward the end of his 2016 presidential campaign. Trump has
pleaded not guilty and called the investigation a partisan “witch hunt.”

Vyskocil was nominated by Trump in 2019 and easily confirmed in the Senate
by a 91-3 vote.

<https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/19/judge-sides-with-house-gop-in-court- fight-with-manhattan-da-bragg-over-trump-probe.html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)