• Re: Why Bannon trial judge Nichols was correct to disallow an "executiv

    From Conan@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 23 02:17:18 2022
    XPost: soc.women, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism
    XPost: alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns

    On 22 Jul 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:uEICK.53585$BZ1.42636@fx03.iad:

    It's a long read, but worthwhile: https://www.lawfareblog.com/why-steve-bannons-contempt-prosecution-revo lves-around-his-attorney-robert-j-costello

    Bannon's trial attorneys have, of course, said they're going to make a "bulletproof" [sic] appeal. An appeal can only be made to claim the
    trial judge made mistakes of law. Nichols made no mistakes of law.

    We're going to find out, aren't we dwarf? Kristin Amerling is another
    Cassidy Hutchinson. The conviction hinged on her testimony and
    questionable procedural conduct.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)