From Juan Rodriguez@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 15 08:38:55 2022
Spontaneous causality is the crux of the issue which would prove the causa prima made all others spontaneous. Spontaneously predicting spontaneous events is divine order of free will. An overloaded chance switch would fail because the spontaneous switch
can’t be loaded. It’s a spontaneity screen with the resolution to decide for screener’s remorse. We’re using signals from a ghetto pickup game. In the pickup game of spontaneous reflexes the juror executor is the conditioner of enjoyment. So on
the computer you would simulate this type of random encounter with a lottery style if independent decision making for the controlled results of a spontaneous pickup reflex in a stochastic society. My analysis among young college students as a juror
demographic was that most students were chatting during projects or exams and tended to answer in clique the same way making the submitted project moot and acollaborative which is how they solved work production problems socially. Applying this to a
jury situation with adaptive technology would tend to use a pop up style forum with a sequential series of jury questions using a final summary answer like a public log deliberation or mutual exclusion by census or demographic or mutliregional juries.
The obvious solution is to hang the vote by default of technality for lack of a better jury system meaning there was a better jury but it could not be found.