"Baxter" <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:t60d6n$19ud$1@gioia.aioe.org...in
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote
californinews:jo978h5cvh7l2kfj9lk7tfqgh6m943jj0e@4ax.com:
https://apnews.com/article/technology-government-and-politics-
Mena-los-angeles-1ee602b76a4f9707c923a27da5805bcd
LOS ANGELES (AP) - A Los Angeles judge has ruled that California's
landmark law requiring women on corporate boards is unconstitutional.
Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis said the law that would have
required boards have up to three female directors by this year
violated the right to equal treatment. The ruling was dated Friday.
The conservative legal group Judicial Watch had challenged the law,
claiming it was illegal to use taxpayer funds to enforce a law that
violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution by
mandating a gender-based quota.
David Levine, a law professor at the University of California Hastings
College of the Law, said he was not surprised by the verdict. Under
state and federal law "mandating a quota like this was never going to
fly," Levine said.
"More women on corporate boards means better decisions and businesses
that outperform the competition," State Senate leader Toni Atkins, a
Democrat from San Diego said in a statement.
No it doesn't, you stupid cunt.
Got to wonder, how can there be Equal Rights if there are only White
men.in the group.
Simple.. all you have to do is be as good or better than those white
If you're not.. then why should you be on the board?
Oh, maybe that's what you're trying to suggest?
That women and minorities aren't as good as white males.
That seems pretty racist and sexist... but by now we're all aware of the liberal's use of double standards.
On 17 May 2022, "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> posted some news:t60ieb$9bq$9...@dont-email.me:
"https://www.efundsrecoverys.com/">"Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message news:t60d6n$19ud$1...@gioia.aioe.org...in
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote
californinews:jo978h5cvh7l2kfj9...@4ax.com:
https://apnews.com/article/technology-government-and-politics-
Mena-los-angeles-1ee602b76a4f9707c923a27da5805bcd
LOS ANGELES (AP) - A Los Angeles judge has ruled that California's
landmark law requiring women on corporate boards is unconstitutional.
Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis said the law that would have
required boards have up to three female directors by this year
violated the right to equal treatment. The ruling was dated Friday.
The conservative legal group Judicial Watch had challenged the law,
claiming it was illegal to use taxpayer funds to enforce a law that
violates the equal protection clause of the California Constitution by >>> mandating a gender-based quota.
David Levine, a law professor at the University of California Hastings >>> College of the Law, said he was not surprised by the verdict. Under
state and federal law "mandating a quota like this was never going to
fly," Levine said.
"More women on corporate boards means better decisions and businesses
that outperform the competition," State Senate leader Toni Atkins, a
Democrat from San Diego said in a statement.
No it doesn't, you stupid cunt.
Got to wonder, how can there be Equal Rights if there are only White
in the group.
Simple.. all you have to do is be as good or better than those whitemen.
If you're not.. then why should you be on the board?
Oh, maybe that's what you're trying to suggest?
That women and minorities aren't as good as white males.
That seems pretty racist and sexist... but by now we're all aware of the liberal's use of double standards.
But it's worked out so well with Kamala Harris. LOL!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 93:23:26 |
Calls: | 6,658 |
Files: | 12,205 |
Messages: | 5,334,294 |