https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades- 200011148.html
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
jurist and great legal mind.
On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades-
200011148.html
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
jurist and great legal mind.
None of the three.
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:52:47 -0700, Blue Lives Matter ><No_Iron_In_My_Junk@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote:
On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades-
200011148.html
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
jurist and great legal mind.
None of the three.
RUDY DETECTOR™
BULLSHIT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
SOPHOMORIC
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
INACCURATE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
WRITTEN BY A DWARF
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
RUNS FROM HIS OWN LIES
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
PROBABILITY
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
^
Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice
Stephen Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old,
but they won't succeed at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black conservative on the highest court of the land.
In article
<super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice
Stephen Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old,
Nobody "forced" Bryer to do anything, and he made that crystal clear.
Republicans are just pissed they won't be able to "pull another RBG"
with Mitch the Bitch bending his very own "rules" into a pretzel to
install another Torquemada like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett on the
court.
but they won't succeed at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black
conservative on the highest court of the land.
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:
In article
<super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.
What law did he so blantantly violate?
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:53:57 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:52:47 -0700, Blue Lives Matter
<No_Iron_In_My_Junk@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote:
On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades-
200011148.html
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
jurist and great legal mind.
None of the three.
RUDY DETECTORâ„¢
BULLSHIT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
SOPHOMORIC
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
INACCURATE
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
WRITTEN BY A DWARF
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
RUNS FROM HIS OWN LIES
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
^
PROBABILITY
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
^
Poor "Rudy." <LOL> So desperate for my attention. Too bad that he's
just not worthy of it.
On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some
news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:
In article
<super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's
a bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.
What law did he so blantantly violate?
This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:
28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or
magistrate judge
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States
shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his
impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following
circumstances:
(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of
relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
(iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could
be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455
Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting
texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had
discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with
Clarence.
Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted, convicted and put in prison.
On 10 Apr 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:4XM4K.427549$t2Bb.304251@fx98.iad:
On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some
news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:
In article
<super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's
a bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.
What law did he so blantantly violate?
This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:
28 U.S. Code ยง 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or
magistrate judge
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States
shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his
impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following
circumstances:
(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of
relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
(iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could
be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455
Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting
texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had
discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with
Clarence.
Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted,
convicted and put in prison.
You seem to have comprehension issues.
Assuming you are refering [sic] to 5(i)-(iv).
All you have are "what is" and "what if".
On 10 Apr 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:4XM4K.427549$t2Bb.304251@fx98.iad:
On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some
news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:
In article
<super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's
a bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.
What law did he so blantantly violate?
This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:
28 U.S. Code ยง 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or
magistrate judge
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States
shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his
impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following
circumstances:
(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of
relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
(iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could
be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455
Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting
texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had
discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with
Clarence.
Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted,
convicted and put in prison.
You seem to have comprehension issues.
Assuming you are refering [sic] to 5(i)-(iv).
All you have are "what is" and "what if".
On 4/10/2022 5:40 PM, super70s wrote:
Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice
Stephen Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old,
Nobody "forced" Bryer to do anything, and he made that crystal clear.
Republicans are just pissed they won't be able to "pull another RBG"
with Mitch the Bitch bending his very own "rules" into a pretzel to
install another Torquemada like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett on the
court.
but they won't succeed at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black
conservative on the highest court of the land.
Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.
He's also a bad justice because he has no coherent judicial philosophy. For some 25 years, his contribution to Supreme Court decisions was to type "Yeah!"
at the bottom of Scalia's opinions.
No ethics, no intellect, and now a law-breaker. He's worse than a mediocrity.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 98:39:27 |
Calls: | 6,659 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,208 |
Messages: | 5,334,600 |