• Progressives are wrong about Clarence Thomas. And they have been for de

    From Leroy N. Soetoro@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 10 20:32:04 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades- 200011148.html

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
    jurist and great legal mind. Calls for him to be impeached, recuse himself
    on certain cases, or resign from the U.S. Supreme Court are preposterous
    and without merit.

    The news media and Democrats in Congress have a problem with Thomas
    because he is a conservative judge who does not subscribe to the
    progressive box they want him to be in.

    When I first moved to Washington, D.C., as a recent graduate from
    Pepperdine University to work at the White House, I had the honor of
    meeting with Thomas in his office. We talked about his book, “My
    Grandfather’s Son,” and I told him how much I identified with his story of being raised by his grandfather. I admire how his values, work ethic and
    spirit remain with him today.

    Thomas' grandfather set an example
    Thomas told me he is not a partisan activist the way the left makes him
    out to be, but an advocate of freedom and the Constitution. He said his grandfather was the freest man he ever met, and now, sitting on the
    highest court of the land for a lifetime appointment, he too is free. Free
    to think, dream and live the life he wants for himself and his family.
    That was the American Dream, and he is living it as a conservative minded, Black American who loves the Constitution.

    Some on the left hate the idea of a Black conservative. Don’t believe me?
    Look at how progressives go out of their way to besmirch character,
    isolate and belittle prominent Black conservatives in America. Some
    liberals seek to shame us because they can’t fathom how we think for
    ourselves. Even Joe Biden, when he was campaigning for president, called
    our Blackness into question.

    Ketanji Brown Jackson said she didn't know that Judge Janice Rogers
    Brown's nomination to the federal bench was filibustered for two years by Senate Democrats. Why? Brown is a Black conservative, so it's not worth
    knowing that, despite her having been once on the verge of becoming the
    first Black woman on the Supreme Court. Liberals could not have that history-making moment go to a Black conservative; it needed to be a
    liberal.

    Jackson also has said she doesn't understand Thomas. What is there not to understand? Again, she should take the time to read his book or watch his
    new documentary to learn about his political evolution from a liberal
    young man to the conservative-minded judge he is today.

    Thomas' wife doesn't influence him
    The idea that Thomas needs to step aside is without merit. Just because
    his wife is a political activist with her own mind, connections and
    platform does not mean she influences the way he rules on the Supreme
    Court.

    There are many examples of spouses having differing views on issues and
    not impacting the way the spouse with the decision-making power acts.
    Think of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Eleanor Roosevelt, President Gerald Ford and Betty Ford, President George W. Bush and Laura Bush, and President Donald Trump and Melania Trump. Kellyanne Conway and Mary
    Matalin served when their husbands had differing views.

    Legal scholar Jonathan Turley has argued that Thomas should not recuse
    himself from a broad range of cases, be impeached or resign from the high
    court based off his wife’s activism.

    Ginni Thomas told The Washington Free Beacon: "Like so many married
    couples, we share many of the same ideals, principles, and aspirations for America, but we have our own separate careers, and our own ideas and
    opinions too. Clarence doesn't discuss his work with me, and I don't
    involve him in my work."

    Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice Stephen
    Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old, but they won't succeed
    at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black conservative on the highest
    court of the land.

    Paris Dennard is the national spokesperson and director of Black Media
    Affairs for the Republican National Committee.

    https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades- 200011148.html

    --
    "LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
    recover with no after effects.

    No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
    Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

    Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
    ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
    fiasco, President Trump.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
    queer liberal democrat donors.

    President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blue Lives Matter@21:1/5 to Leroy N. Soetoro on Sun Apr 10 15:52:47 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
    https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades- 200011148.html

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
    jurist and great legal mind.

    None of the three.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Schadenfreude@21:1/5 to No_Iron_In_My_Junk@Systemic_Treason on Sun Apr 10 15:53:57 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:52:47 -0700, Blue Lives Matter <No_Iron_In_My_Junk@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote:

    On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
    https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades-
    200011148.html

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
    jurist and great legal mind.

    None of the three.

    RUDY DETECTOR™


    BULLSHIT
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    SOPHOMORIC
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    INACCURATE
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    WRITTEN BY A DWARF
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    RUNS FROM HIS OWN LIES
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^

    PROBABILITY
    0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
    ^

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blue Lives Matter@21:1/5 to klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmai on Sun Apr 10 19:15:35 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:53:57 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:52:47 -0700, Blue Lives Matter ><No_Iron_In_My_Junk@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote:

    On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
    https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades-
    200011148.html

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
    jurist and great legal mind.

    None of the three.

    RUDY DETECTOR™


    BULLSHIT
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    SOPHOMORIC
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    INACCURATE
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    WRITTEN BY A DWARF
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    RUNS FROM HIS OWN LIES
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^

    PROBABILITY
    0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
    ^


    Poor "Rudy." <LOL> So desperate for my attention. Too bad that he's
    just not worthy of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 10 19:40:40 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice
    Stephen Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old,

    Nobody "forced" Bryer to do anything, and he made that crystal clear.

    Republicans are just pissed they won't be able to "pull another RBG"
    with Mitch the Bitch bending his very own "rules" into a pretzel to
    install another Torquemada like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett on the
    court.

    but they won't succeed at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black conservative on the highest court of the land.

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
    bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Legitimate Political Discourse@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 11 01:25:46 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:

    In article
    <super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
    bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.

    What law did he so blantantly violate?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to super70s@super70s.invalid on Sun Apr 10 18:19:02 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    In article
    <super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
    bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.

    --
    :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
    I am an Andrea Doria sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 10 20:00:32 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 4/10/2022 5:40 PM, super70s wrote:
    Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice
    Stephen Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old,

    Nobody "forced" Bryer to do anything, and he made that crystal clear.

    Republicans are just pissed they won't be able to "pull another RBG"
    with Mitch the Bitch bending his very own "rules" into a pretzel to
    install another Torquemada like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett on the
    court.

    but they won't succeed at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black
    conservative on the highest court of the land.

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
    bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    He's also a bad justice because he has no coherent judicial philosophy. For some 25 years, his contribution to Supreme Court decisions was to type "Yeah!" at the bottom of Scalia's opinions.

    No ethics, no intellect, and now a law-breaker. He's worse than a mediocrity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to Legitimate Political Discourse on Sun Apr 10 20:06:38 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
    On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:

    In article
    <super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
    bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.

    What law did he so blantantly violate?

    This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:

    28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

    (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall
    disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might
    reasonably be questioned.

    (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
    (5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship
    to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
    (iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be
    substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

    Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with Clarence.

    Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted, convicted and put in prison.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to Blue Lives Matter on Sun Apr 10 19:57:40 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 4/10/2022 4:15 PM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
    On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:53:57 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:52:47 -0700, Blue Lives Matter
    <No_Iron_In_My_Junk@Systemic_Treason.KMA> wrote:

    On 4/10/2022 1:32 PM, Leroy N. Soetoro wrote:
    https://news.yahoo.com/progressives-wrong-clarence-thomas-decades-
    200011148.html

    Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is an honorable man, impeccable
    jurist and great legal mind.

    None of the three.

    RUDY DETECTORâ„¢


    BULLSHIT
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    SOPHOMORIC
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    INACCURATE
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    WRITTEN BY A DWARF
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^
    RUNS FROM HIS OWN LIES
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    ^

    PROBABILITY
    0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
    ^


    Poor "Rudy." <LOL> So desperate for my attention. Too bad that he's
    just not worthy of it.

    Ha ha ha! HA HA HA HA HA! BlueGirl lies. She responded to me more than a *dozen* times today.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Legitimate Political Discourse@21:1/5 to All on Mon Apr 11 04:06:39 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 10 Apr 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:4XM4K.427549$t2Bb.304251@fx98.iad:

    On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
    On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some
    news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:

    In article
    <super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's
    a bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.

    What law did he so blantantly violate?

    This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:

    28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or
    magistrate judge

    (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States
    shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his
    impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

    (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following
    circumstances:
    (5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of
    relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
    (iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could
    be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

    Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting
    texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had
    discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with
    Clarence.

    Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted, convicted and put in prison.

    You seem to have comprehension issues.

    "...in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

    "...reasonably..."

    <https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/uscode.php?width=840&height=800&i frame=true&def_id=28-USC-408818804-1019605827&term_occur=999&term_src=>

    proceeding
    (1) “proceeding” includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other
    stages of litigation;

    Assuming you are refering to 5(i)-(iv).

    All you have are "what is" and "what if". You don't have any circumstance where his rulings and opinions alone made a difference, or further you
    cannot show he or his wife stood to gain personally or financially. All
    you have is flimsy crowd biased conjecture based on "what is" and "what
    if".

    Make your case.

    If a frog had wings he wouldn't bump his butt on the ground.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to Legitimate Political Discourse on Sun Apr 10 21:42:16 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    On 4/10/2022 9:06 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
    On 10 Apr 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:4XM4K.427549$t2Bb.304251@fx98.iad:

    On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
    On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some
    news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:

    In article
    <super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's
    a bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.

    What law did he so blantantly violate?

    This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:

    28 U.S. Code ยง 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or
    magistrate judge

    (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States
    shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his
    impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

    (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following
    circumstances:
    (5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of
    relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
    (iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could
    be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

    Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting
    texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had
    discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with
    Clarence.

    Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted,
    convicted and put in prison.

    You seem to have comprehension issues.

    None whatever.
    \

    Assuming you are refering [sic] to 5(i)-(iv).

    All you have are "what is" and "what if".

    The corrupt law-breaking unethical Clarence *knew* his fat slag wife "Ginni" was
    involved up to her eyebrows in Jan 6 2021 cases. He ruled on them anyway. He broke the law.

    Your shit-4-braincell question was "What law did he so blantantly violate?" I told you, and I *proved* that he violated it. You have nothing left to say. Fuck off and die now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rudy Canoza@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 10 21:47:55 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: alt.chadlee.cuck.blowjob

    On 4/10/2022 9:06 PM, Chadlee "cuck" Blowjob, 250lb 5'3" morbidly obese convicted child molester and lying fat fuck, lied:


    On 10 Apr 2022, Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> posted some news:4XM4K.427549$t2Bb.304251@fx98.iad:

    On 4/10/2022 6:25 PM, Legitimate Political Discourse wrote:
    On 10 Apr 2022, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> posted some
    news:chine.bleu-08582A.18185410042022@reader.eternal-september.org:

    In article
    <super70s-114468.19404010042022@reader02.eternal-september.org>,
    super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's
    a bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    And he violated federal law. But laws don't apply to republicans.

    What law did he so blantantly violate?

    This one, you stupid shit-gobbling fat fuck:

    28 U.S. Code ยง 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or
    magistrate judge

    (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States
    shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his
    impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

    (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following
    circumstances:
    (5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of
    relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
    (iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could
    be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455

    Clarence knew *all* about "Ginni's" coup-and-insurrection-promoting
    texts with Mark Meadows. "Ginni" *told* Meadows that she had
    discussed the efforts *illegally* to overturn the election with
    Clarence.

    Thomas broke the law. He needs to be impeached, removed, prosecuted,
    convicted and put in prison.

    You seem to have comprehension issues.

    None whatever, Blowjob.


    Assuming you are refering [sic] to 5(i)-(iv).

    All you have are "what is" and "what if".

    The corrupt law-breaking unethical Clarence *knew* his fat slag wife "Ginni" was
    involved up to her eyebrows in Jan 6 2021 cases, Blowjob. He ruled on them anyway, Blowjob. He broke the law, Blowjob.

    Your shit-4-braincell question, Blowjob, was "What law did he so blantantly [sic] violate?" I told you, Blowjob, and I *proved* that he violated it, Blowjob. You have nothing left to say, Blowjob. Fuck off and die now, Blowjob.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bribing the Bidens on NBC@21:1/5 to Rudy Canoza on Mon Apr 11 08:20:07 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans XPost: sac.politics

    In article <kRM4K.692687$oF2.620042@fx10.iad>
    Rudy Canoza <notgenx33@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 4/10/2022 5:40 PM, super70s wrote:
    Democrats were successful at leading a campaign to force Justice
    Stephen Breyer into retirement because he is 83 years old,

    Nobody "forced" Bryer to do anything, and he made that crystal clear.

    Republicans are just pissed they won't be able to "pull another RBG"
    with Mitch the Bitch bending his very own "rules" into a pretzel to
    install another Torquemada like Gorsuch, Kavanaugh or Barrett on the
    court.

    but they won't succeed at forcing out Thomas because he is a Black
    conservative on the highest court of the land.

    Thomas isn't a bad justice because he's Black or conservative, he's a
    bad justice because he lacks any reasonable ethics.

    He's also a bad justice because he has no coherent judicial philosophy. For some 25 years, his contribution to Supreme Court decisions was to type "Yeah!"
    at the bottom of Scalia's opinions.

    No ethics, no intellect, and now a law-breaker. He's worse than a mediocrity.

    Liberals have been trying to force Breyer out for six years.

    At least he wasn't marrying faggots, who shortly thereafter beat
    the holy shit out of each other and got divorced.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)