XPost: or.politics, talk.politics.guns

Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in
news:soc27c$og1$2@gioia.aioe.org:

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> wrote
in news:8okiqgdkrmtnr3d01rllma2032j0c013fb@4ax.com:

On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:31:17 -0800 (PST), bigdog
<geowright1963@gmail.com> wrote:

We need a book titled The Constitution for Dummies.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/aoc-is-latest-democrat-to-laun
c h-attack-on-supreme-court/ar-AARojjW?ocid=msedgntp

She questions the legitimacy of SCOTUS because Trump appointed 3 of
the 9 justices. Maybe I should type this slowly so AOC can follow
along. The POTUS nominates SCOTUS justices and the Senate approves or >>>rejects them. When Trump took office, there was one vacancy on the
Court and two more occurred during his administration. That allowed
him, and only him, the power to nominate justices for the Senate to >>>consider. He did that and the Senate approved all three of his
nominees and they are now serving on the Court.

The ditz further questioned the legitimacy of Trump's nominees
because he didn't win the popular vote. Somebody should tell AOC that
no president has ever been elected by popular vote. Four of the
current justices were appointed by Presidents who did not win the
popular vote. Bush43 nominated John Roberts without having one the >>>popular vote in 2000. He won the popular vote in 2004 prior to
nominating Alito. None of that matters because his presidency was
just as legitimate in his first term after losing the popular vote as
it was during his second term after winning the popular vote.

How did someone as dumb as AOC graduate from Boston University. Is
that a diploma mill?

Typical Democrat. Good thing there is no intelligence test for
becoming a Representative-- she'd still be serving coffee.

Actually some of the Supreme court justices are beginning to question
the legitimacy of SCOTUS. It is certainly a concern

No they aren't and no it isn't.

The communists got their court packing goal shot down. Looks like the
lefty scumbags went a little too far for everybody.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.lunatics, alt.abortion
XPost: talk.politics.misc

In article <43327a10-88fb-44ee-b117-
ce1a5d708884n@googlegroups.com>
I'm an asshole <solletica@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 2:31:18 PM UTC-6, bigdog wrote:

We need a book titled The Constitution for Dummies.

Would still be too advanced for leftards to read

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/aoc-is-latest-democrat-to-launch-

attack-on-supreme-court/ar-AARojjW?ocid=msedgntp

She questions the legitimacy of SCOTUS because Trump appointed 3 of the 9

justices.

Getting the SCOTUS to protect Roe v Wade is

None of your fucking business. You get fucked up your ass all
the time but you'll never get knocked up because you were born
with a penis.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: or.politics, talk.politics.guns

Dooley <none@yahoo.com> wrote in news:XnsADF4EDBAD21B0D021C@0.0.0.0:

Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote in

Actually some of the Supreme court justices are beginning to question
the legitimacy of SCOTUS. It is certainly a concern

No they aren't and no it isn't.

The communists got their court packing goal shot down. Looks like the
lefty scumbags went a little too far for everybody.

=============
Several of the court’s liberal justices, including Sonya Sotomayor and
Stephen Breyer, warned their colleagues about putting politics above well- settled law. Sotomayor, at one point, asked: “Will this institution survive
the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution
and its reading are just political acts? I don’t see how it is possible.”

https://news.northeastern.edu/2021/12/01/supreme-court-mississippi- abortion-case/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)