• Unite States Judge Petrese B. Tucker is Asshole Kisser

    From JC Luo@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 13 16:28:20 2021
    Unite States Judge Petrese B. Tucker is Asshole Kisser


    http://www.idioticidiot.com/servlet/idioticidiot.cmd?fa=tuckerassholekisser

    If you were an attorney, have you ever heard that a judge ordered a plaintiff to amend his complaint when the defendant faced a request for default because of failing to answer in the specified time? You should never hear. In this post, you will
    see that Judge Petrese B. Tucker should be the only garbage judge in the world. When defendants faced a default because of failing to answer, judge Tucker ordered the plaintiff to amend his complaint such that defendants could have 14 fresh days to
    answer and escaped a default request. You should never see this kind of garbage judge. Defendants failed to answer. Judge Tucker did not rule against the defendants but ordered the plaintiff to amend his complaint such that the defendants could have 14
    fresh days to answer.

    Judge Petrese B. Tucker is a United States judge who presided over the three cases 14-6354, 16-6568, and 17-1508. The deadline for defendants to answer the three cases had expired four-plus years ago. Under this circumstance, it is a regular
    practice that the plaintiff would request a default. This author followed the rules to make a default request. Defendants also filed an opposition.

    Judge Tucker could either grant defendants an extension of time to answer if defendants showed good cause or entered default. That was how the rules said.

    However, to favor defendants, judge Tucker acted lawlessly and evilly. Judge Tucker did not grant defendants an extension of time to answer and also did not enter default. What Judge Tucker did was nothing but showed she is evil and shameless.
    According to the rules, if this author amended the complaints, judge Tucker doesn't have to grant defendants an extension of time, and defendants could automatically have 14 fresh days to answer. Understandably, the simplest solution for defendants to
    escape a default was to cheat this author to amend the complaints. That was what Judge Tucker did. Judge Tucker cheated this author to amend complaints by issuing the following so-called order on February 9, 2021, in the three cases 14-6354, 16-6568, and
    17-1508:

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is directed to consolidate his claims as per (Civ. A. No. 15-4248, ECF. No. 21) by filing a second amended consolidated complaint in Civil Action No. 14-6354 so that litigation can proceed.

    The order said that cases 16-6568 and 17-1508 could not proceed and should be re-pled into 14-6354 for proceeding. It is easy to see that the order is a cheat. Judge Tucker cheated this author to amend the complaints.

    First, Judge Tucker cheated this author that cases 16-6568 and 17-1508 should be re-pled into 14-6354 as a second amended consolidated complaint by citing the order (Civ. A. No. 15-4248, E.C.F. No. 21). That was a lie. The order (Civ. A. No. 15-
    4248, E.C.F. No. 21) never decided that cases 16-6568 and 17-1508 should be re-pled into 14-6354 as a second amended consolidated complaint. Judge Petrese B. Tucker lied, a liar. If Judge Tucker disagreed, judge Tucker is welcome to sue this author for
    defamation. Go ahead to sue this author for defamation. What the order (Civ. A. No. 15-4248, E.C.F. No. 21) decided was to re-plead four of 15-4248 claims that were dismissed without prejudice into 14-6354 as a second amended consolidated complaint,
    which never decided cases 16-6568 and 17-1508. Judge Petrese B. Tucker is a liar, a piece of human trash, cheating this author to amend the complaints.

    Second, Judge Tucker said the cases 16-6568 and 17-1508 cannot proceed and should be re-pled into 14-6354 to proceed. Judge Tucker is evil. The summons for cases 16-6568 and 17-1508 had served on defendants four-plus years ago. Defendants had not
    answered or moved to dismiss the complaints. Defendants had not raised any issue that cases 16-6568 and 17-1508 cannot proceed. Such an issue also had not been argued. Under procedural due process, judge Tucker could not decide it because judge Tucker
    did not allow parties to be heard. Judge Tucker cheated this author to amend the complaints.

    What we have seen is that Judge Tucker is evil, cheating this author to amend the complaints.

    If you were an attorney, have you ever heard that a judge ordered a plaintiff to amend his complaint when the defendant faced a request for default because of failing to answer in the specified time? You should never hear. Judge Tucker is evil,
    who may be the only garbage judge in the world, ordering a plaintiff to amend a complaint when defendants faced a default because of failing to answer. According to Luo's law of opinion1, United States judge Petrese B. Tucker is an asshole kisser because
    she did not make decisions by the law but by who you are. WHEREFORE, United States judge Petrese B. Tucker is an asshole kisser.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)