XPost: mn.politics, sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

In article <s6upqg$l92$1@dont-email.me>
Bill Flett <notgenx32@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/5/2021 11:36 AM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his
scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and lied:

On 5/5/21 1:49 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

On 5/5/2021 10:43 AM, Bill Flett wrote:

On 5/5/2021 10:39 AM, Yak wrote:

On 5/5/21 1:26 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

On 5/5/2021 9:52 AM, Yak wrote:

On 5/5/21 12:23 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:

In article <s6u83o$3t5$1@dont-email.me>, Yak <yak@inbox.com>
wrote:

I guess asking a juror to tell the truth up front was too much to >>>>>>>> ask.

Voir-dire is made under oath with perjury on lying.

The voir-dire is public record. Quote the juror not telling the >>>>>>> truth. Otherwise you can be dismissed as lying.

Here's the rest of the article...not sure why the original poster >>>>>> didn't include it. I'll just rely on Mitchell's own words here.

"Mitchell said the event was commemorating the 57th anniversary of >>>>>> King's famous speech, which advocated for civil and economic rights >>>>>> for Blacks, and is credited with helping to pass the Civil Rights >>>>>> Act of 1964. The event was "100 percent not" a march for Floyd,
Mitchell said, adding, "It was directly related to MLK's March on >>>>>> Washington from the '60s … The date of the March on Washington is >>>>>> the date."

The event included advocating for racial justice, increasing voter >>>>>> registration, pushing for a new version of the Voting Rights Act of >>>>>> 1965 and urging participation in the 2020 census.

It also focused on police use of force. Floyd's brother and sister, >>>>>> Philonise and Bridgett Floyd, and family members of others who have >>>>>> been shot by police addressed the crowd. It served as a rallying >>>>>> point for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, a federal
police reform bill.

*Mitchell said he answered "no" to two questions in the juror
questionnaire sent out before jury selection that asked about
participation in demonstrations.

The first question asked, "Did you, or someone close to you,
participate in any of the demonstrations or marches against police >>>>>> brutality that took place in Minneapolis after George Floyd's death?" >>>>>>
The second asked, "Other than what you have already described
above, have you, or anyone close to you, participated in protests >>>>>> about police use of force or police brutality?"*

He answered truthfully.  The Washington DC march was to commemorate >>>>> MLK's speech, not to protest police brutality.

What part of *It also focused on police use of force* didn't you
quite grasp?

It was not the main aspect of the march, you fucking illiterate
*priest-fucked* loser.

Correction:
^^^^^

Democrats always lie and this juror is no different.

Correct.

Thanks for your honesty.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)