John Nash’s game theory is a popular concept in economics that explains collective decision making. In general a game of decision outcomes is simply displayed by a two dimensional table with positive and negative cost and profit outcomes in varying
amounts based on each decision made collectively.

The prisoner’s dilemma scenario works as follows:

Two suspects have been apprehended for a crime and are now in separate rooms in a police station, with no means of communicating with each other. The prosecutor has separately told them the following:

If you confess and agree to testify against the other suspect, who does not confess, the charges against you will be dropped and you will go scot-free.
If you do not confess but the other suspect does, you will be convicted and the prosecution will seek the maximum sentence of three years.
If both of you confess, you will both be sentenced to two years in prison.
If neither of you confesses, you will both be charged with misdemeanors and will be sentenced to one year in prison.

This highly influential economic theory developed by a mentally ill scholar more recently has been used to support sex work by creating a controlled forum where men can experience sex with women for money without committing to marriage or children and
without risking a venereal disease. Like a modern square dance voluptuous women are hired to come on to men at the bar watching women dance naked and are cases out for a lap dance with groping. This social script offers experiences with women according
to a social script and often alleviates the boredoms and pressure men face in inter gender relations. I have come across a more interesting development of game theory involving the casing of immediate objectives within reach. In my encounters with the
space program and the science of the unknown I have found useful more creative artistic techniques to foreshadow and explain the limits of the universe through the limits of human perception. Most military or police militia men operate by chain of
command and rely on overtly verifiable facts at cost of money or human life. In fact, most adults make their personal decisions according to the game theory of sex or money. However there is an alternative game theory interpretation applicable to the
science of discovery that is more appropriate. A distance feature in game theory indicates how fuzzy the reward or cost is known or established. Put simply a person playing the Russian roulette game of modern policing or military operations may not
appreciate a trivial computer video game despite its demonstration of same cognitive principles in practice. In short, a game that correlates gaming style to economic or sexual profit or cost might not conclusively bear fruit in the knowledge of the
immediate payoff but may indicate an alternative all around gamesmanship.

https://youtu.be/-FZ-pPFAjYY

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)