• =?UTF-8?Q?Arizona_=27audit=27_results_reaffirm_Biden=E2=80=99s_victory_

    From Scream@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 24 19:03:41 2021
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    Hehehe!
    😎

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Winston@21:1/5 to Scream on Sat Sep 25 13:15:41 2021
    Scream <csoka01@gmail.com> writes:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The result of audits in Arizona and anywhere else, no matter what they
    find, won't change the presidential election results. The only vote
    that matters for that office is the Electoral College vote, and the
    result of that vote is known. [Maybe state, U.S. House, or U.S. Senate
    seats could change, though?]

    That said, I consider the audits a good thing. In 2016, the Democrats
    didn't trust the election results. In 2020, the Republicans didn't.
    Having a good, thorough audit, and fixing whatever problems are
    uncovered, is a good thing for vote integrity.

    The Democrats should have said sure, knock yourself out doing that if
    you want. Saying No, no, don't look, don't question the result, we
    got the result we wanted so no one is allowed to check whether we won
    fairly or not, is suspicious and makes it look like they're afraid of wrongdoing being discovered.
    -WBE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From uncle_vito@21:1/5 to Winston on Sat Sep 25 12:57:52 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 10:15:45 AM UTC-7, Winston wrote:
    Scream <cso...@gmail.com> writes:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The result of audits in Arizona and anywhere else, no matter what they
    find, won't change the presidential election results. The only vote
    that matters for that office is the Electoral College vote, and the
    result of that vote is known. [Maybe state, U.S. House, or U.S. Senate
    seats could change, though?]

    That said, I consider the audits a good thing. In 2016, the Democrats
    didn't trust the election results. In 2020, the Republicans didn't.
    Having a good, thorough audit, and fixing whatever problems are
    uncovered, is a good thing for vote integrity.

    The Democrats should have said sure, knock yourself out doing that if
    you want. Saying No, no, don't look, don't question the result, we
    got the result we wanted so no one is allowed to check whether we won
    fairly or not, is suspicious and makes it look like they're afraid of wrongdoing being discovered.
    -WBE


    No one or at least I did not expect a recount to change the election. I just wanted to know how many ballots were tossed, were from dead people, were from illegals. This is a referendom on the ability to cheat using mail in ballots and the current
    voting system. DID THE RECOUNT MATCH THE RESULTS OFTHE ORIGINAL ELECTION??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Bowler@21:1/5 to Scream on Sat Sep 25 18:02:21 2021
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scream@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 25 15:48:50 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 12:57:54 PM UTC-7, uncle_vito wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 10:15:45 AM UTC-7, Winston wrote:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The result of audits in Arizona and anywhere else, no matter what they find, won't change the presidential election results. The only vote
    that matters for that office is the Electoral College vote, and the
    result of that vote is known. [Maybe state, U.S. House, or U.S. Senate seats could change, though?]

    That said, I consider the audits a good thing. In 2016, the Democrats didn't trust the election results. In 2020, the Republicans didn't.
    Having a good, thorough audit, and fixing whatever problems are
    uncovered, is a good thing for vote integrity.

    The Democrats should have said sure, knock yourself out doing that if
    you want. Saying No, no, don't look, don't question the result, we
    got the result we wanted so no one is allowed to check whether we won fairly or not, is suspicious and makes it look like they're afraid of wrongdoing being discovered.
    -WBE
    No one or at least I did not expect a recount to change the election. I just wanted to know how many ballots were tossed, were from dead people, were from illegals. This is a referendom on the ability to cheat using mail in ballots and the current
    voting system. DID THE RECOUNT MATCH THE RESULTS OFTHE ORIGINAL ELECTION??

    Common now, how do you get votes from dead people or toas out ballats?
    This is Trump's trumpt up charges!
    Man lives in a fantesy world!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scream@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Sat Sep 25 15:45:40 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?

    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!
    Trump is a con man, everyone knows it!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 26 14:43:17 2021
    Your just chasing spooks which are not there Vito. The election was fair and square.


    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 12:57:54 PM UTC-7, uncle_vito wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 10:15:45 AM UTC-7, Winston wrote:
    Scream <cso...@gmail.com> writes:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The result of audits in Arizona and anywhere else, no matter what they find, won't change the presidential election results. The only vote
    that matters for that office is the Electoral College vote, and the
    result of that vote is known. [Maybe state, U.S. House, or U.S. Senate seats could change, though?]

    That said, I consider the audits a good thing. In 2016, the Democrats didn't trust the election results. In 2020, the Republicans didn't.
    Having a good, thorough audit, and fixing whatever problems are
    uncovered, is a good thing for vote integrity.

    The Democrats should have said sure, knock yourself out doing that if
    you want. Saying No, no, don't look, don't question the result, we
    got the result we wanted so no one is allowed to check whether we won fairly or not, is suspicious and makes it look like they're afraid of wrongdoing being discovered.
    -WBE
    No one or at least I did not expect a recount to change the election. I just wanted to know how many ballots were tossed, were from dead people, were from illegals. This is a referendom on the ability to cheat using mail in ballots and the current
    voting system. DID THE RECOUNT MATCH THE RESULTS OFTHE ORIGINAL ELECTION??

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to Scream on Mon Sep 27 12:56:06 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:45:42 PM UTC-7, Scream wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?
    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!
    Trump is a con man, everyone knows it!

    Yep and he has ALWAYS been a Grifter, Conman-Hustler. His latest scam is how he charges taxpayers Rack Rates for his Gov. Security teams lodging rates at MaraLargo. Note: These 2 rooms are closest to Trump's suite. So he charges a a higher Rent
    Rate for them. The Government is paying something like $500 per Room. X2.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Bowler@21:1/5 to Scream on Mon Sep 27 20:27:07 2021
    On 2021-09-25 6:45 p.m., Scream wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?

    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!

    My point was because these clowns ruined a bunch of
    voting machines, the taxpayers are having to pay a
    lot more than $150K. I don't care that a bunch of
    Trump supporting fools were bilked for another $6 million.

    There is the possibility that they weren't fools
    and really just wanted the reams of confidential
    private personal data that Cyber Ninjas demanded in
    addition to the ballots.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to Scream on Tue Sep 28 06:45:17 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:45:42 PM UTC-7, Scream wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?
    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!
    Trump is a con man, everyone knows it!

    He will look great in a prison clothes.. But he can't wear a toupee in prison.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Tue Sep 28 10:09:35 2021
    On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 5:27:12 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-25 6:45 p.m., Scream wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?

    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!
    My point was because these clowns ruined a bunch of
    voting machines, the taxpayers are having to pay a
    lot more than $150K. I don't care that a bunch of
    Trump supporting fools were bilked for another $6 million.

    There is the possibility that they weren't fools
    and really just wanted the reams of confidential
    private personal data that Cyber Ninjas demanded in
    addition to the ballots.

    I would like to see them punished if they use our addresses for mass marketing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Tue Sep 28 11:38:30 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?

    Perhaps they want to be able to sell the information to marketing companies. FRESH lists with voters names and addresses have value to all kinds of marketing peeps. They can use these lists for all sorts of things... They can combine other search
    engines to find out a lot about a person. Total INVASION of privacy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Tue Sep 28 12:06:29 2021
    On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 5:27:12 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-25 6:45 p.m., Scream wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 3:02:25 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-24 10:03 p.m., Scream wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The ABC report is slightly incomplete. It reports
    that it cost $150,000 for the taxpayers. That is just
    the amount paid directly to these charlatans. In addition
    these incompetents managed to ruin a bunch of voting machines.
    If I recall correctly that will cost a lot more than the
    the $150K to replace.

    At one point they were demanding to be given a lot of
    personal information about the voters. I don't know
    if they got it. Since it was irrelevant to the
    task, you wonder what were they going to do with it?

    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!
    My point was because these clowns ruined a bunch of
    voting machines, the taxpayers are having to pay a
    lot more than $150K. I don't care that a bunch of
    Trump supporting fools were bilked for another $6 million.

    There is the possibility that they weren't fools
    and really just wanted the reams of confidential
    private personal data that Cyber Ninjas demanded in
    addition to the ballots.

    Confidential PERSONAL Data = $$$ for Marketers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Bowler@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Wed Sep 29 21:06:49 2021
    On 2021-09-27 8:27 p.m., Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-25 6:45 p.m., Scream wrote:
    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!

    My point was because these clowns ruined a bunch of
    voting machines, the taxpayers are having to pay a
    lot more than $150K.  I don't care that a bunch of
    Trump supporting fools were bilked for another $6 million.

    Apparently it will cost $3 million to replace the machines
    so the taxpayers are out $3.15 million.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DirtBag@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 1 11:37:02 2021
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 12:57:54 PM UTC-7, uncle_vito wrote:
    On Saturday, September 25, 2021 at 10:15:45 AM UTC-7, Winston wrote:
    Scream <cso...@gmail.com> writes:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrH7qKs0mS4

    The result of audits in Arizona and anywhere else, no matter what they find, won't change the presidential election results. The only vote
    that matters for that office is the Electoral College vote, and the
    result of that vote is known. [Maybe state, U.S. House, or U.S. Senate seats could change, though?]

    That said, I consider the audits a good thing. In 2016, the Democrats didn't trust the election results. In 2020, the Republicans didn't.
    Having a good, thorough audit, and fixing whatever problems are
    uncovered, is a good thing for vote integrity.

    The Democrats should have said sure, knock yourself out doing that if
    you want. Saying No, no, don't look, don't question the result, we
    got the result we wanted so no one is allowed to check whether we won fairly or not, is suspicious and makes it look like they're afraid of wrongdoing being discovered.
    -WBE
    No one or at least I did not expect a recount to change the election. I just wanted to know how many ballots were tossed, were from dead people, were from illegals. This is a referendom on the ability to cheat using mail in ballots and the current
    voting system. DID THE RECOUNT MATCH THE RESULTS OFTHE ORIGINAL ELECTION??

    IDK. But it appears that it must have. We certainly would be hearing about it if it hadn't.. Eh?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -=DirtBag@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Tue Oct 19 09:46:18 2021
    Would the billing on the $3.15 million be paid by the State of Az or via donations from the GOP electorate?
    The Pillow Guy should be sued for some of the costs. The State of Az should sue the Pillow Guy for some of the costs.


    On Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 6:06:54 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-27 8:27 p.m., Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-09-25 6:45 p.m., Scream wrote:
    Total cost $6 million, $150k is the taxpayers cost!

    My point was because these clowns ruined a bunch of
    voting machines, the taxpayers are having to pay a
    lot more than $150K. I don't care that a bunch of
    Trump supporting fools were bilked for another $6 million.
    Apparently it will cost $3 million to replace the machines
    so the taxpayers are out $3.15 million.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Bowler@21:1/5 to DirtBag on Tue Oct 19 20:33:35 2021
    On 2021-10-19 12:46 p.m., -=DirtBag wrote:
    Would the billing on the $3.15 million be paid by the State of
    Az or via donations from the GOP electorate?
    The Pillow Guy should be sued for some of the costs.
    The State of Az should sue the Pillow Guy for some of the costs.

    It will be taxpayers, but I don't know exactly how election
    expenses are done in Arizona. If election costs are paid by
    the county then it might just be the residents of Maricopa
    County on the hook.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -=DirtBag@21:1/5 to Alan Bowler on Fri Dec 10 07:31:03 2021
    On Tuesday, October 19, 2021 at 5:33:40 PM UTC-7, Alan Bowler wrote:
    On 2021-10-19 12:46 p.m., -=DirtBag wrote:
    Would the billing on the $3.15 million be paid by the State of
    Az or via donations from the GOP electorate?
    The Pillow Guy should be sued for some of the costs.
    The State of Az should sue the Pillow Guy for some of the costs.
    It will be taxpayers, but I don't know exactly how election
    expenses are done in Arizona. If election costs are paid by
    the county then it might just be the residents of Maricopa
    County on the hook.

    The GOP is thick in AZ. They were bitch slapped last go round.
    Lots of Dem's moving in and change is coming. Sun City will always be GOP.. But Phoenix is changing !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)