On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 7:51:24 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
Modern thinking on the issue, away from pills and "mills".
It is said by some that, in the case of *exclusively heterosexual men*
(a category which might exist through frustrated lack of self-realization, if it be doubted - I am not one such)
the real statistical benefit of latex prophylactic use *adhered to rigorously*,
as though it would be a "mortal sin" to bareback, in heterosexual dating that "for simplicity's sake" reduces the incidence of anal sex to almost zero, would produce a person that *almost no believable risk for HIV*, even without PReP, and thusly would
be highly unlikely to become even a *low-risk spreader* in frequent vaginal sex. (There is said to be some empirical evidence of this among the "Tinder set".)
That is to say: if you always wear a rubber and always choose "traditional" intercourse -- heavily favored by many women -- the number of dates you go on, or even the "health condition" (serostatus) of your female partners, would be a matter of taste.
Statistics and demographics would really mean a very full sex life was *practically and rationally* virtually free of the risk of HIV. ("Sex-positive women" may want to mull this a bit.)
Sure, you can do people like Charlie Sheen and George W. Bush one better. (Just remember that heterosexual women may somehow judge those who find people attracted to men contemptible. This may be, in some way, a sticking point.)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)