RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:
https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1
In article <2fu0gbhsmt69c7otf3ob1uel2709ltvon9@4ax.com>,
Bill Turlock <billturlock@billturlock.com> wrote:
RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:
https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1
I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would
be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.
On 4/3/2016 9:39 AM, Hactar wrote:
In article <2fu0gbhsmt69c7otf3ob1uel2709ltvon9@4ax.com>,
Bill Turlock <billturlock@billturlock.com> wrote:
RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:
https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1
I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would
be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.
Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.
In article <cb-dnUL0vf7BrpzKnZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@supernews.com>,
Tim Wright <tlwright6x@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/3/2016 9:39 AM, Hactar wrote:
In article <2fu0gbhsmt69c7otf3ob1uel2709ltvon9@4ax.com>,Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.
Bill Turlock <billturlock@billturlock.com> wrote:
RAF Shawbury are yet again at the forefront of the concept of Total
Safety and are the first station in the military to introduce a
dedicated cycle lane on its main runway:
https://www.facebook.com/RAFShawbury/posts/1203808449636852:0?_fb_noscript=1
I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There would >> > be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.
Yes well, err, in my defense I'd like to say WHOA! Look at that bird!
On 2016-04-04, Greg Goss <gossg@gossg.org> wrote:
Bill Turlock <billturlock@billturlock.com> wrote:
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:14:36 -0500, Tim Wright <tlwright6x@gmail.com> >>wrote:
I assume cyclists are evicted when aircraft use the runway? There
would be hell to pay if an aircraft wiped out a peloton.
Seems no one looks at the date of articles any more.
Or, indeed, the Regulation cite in the article. Or... *we* are being >>whooshed, or 'gossed'.
Hactar could have claimed to be gossing, but he'd already conceded by
the time you raised the possibility.
I look forward to the legislation requiring military jets to have
notices on the back warning cyclists not to enter the pilot's blind
spot.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 30:37:24 |
Calls: | 6,648 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,193 |
Messages: | 5,328,367 |