• There is no such thing as a public health expert

    From Andrew W@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 2 14:57:56 2021
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.politics.usa.misc, talk.politics.drugs
    XPost: talk.politics.medicine

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-public-health-expert


    April 1, 2021 (The Dossier) — Since the beginning of COVID Mania, we’ve been
    told to “listen to the public health experts.” Governments and the corporate
    media has identified this category to us as individuals (Dr. Fauci, Rachel Levine, Tedros Adhanom, Bill Gates) and groups (CDC, WHO, Gates Foundation, Imperial College, etc) that are supposedly the best resources out there for dealing with pandemics and disease spread. Want to know about how to deal
    with COVID-19? Follow orders from the omniscient public health experts, we’re told.

    Well, we’re now over a year into this thing, the free world is in shambles, and virtually everything recommended by these supposed world-class experts
    has resulted in complete chaos and devastation.

    The “public health experts” told us that lockdowns were the key to our salvation. When that didn’t work, they did the same thing with masks, curfews, physical distancing, and the like. They had it all figured out,
    until they didn’t, and destroyed tens of millions of lives in their attempts to resolve a virus problem. So how could these highly-touted “experts” get everything so catastrophically wrong?

    And what exactly is a public health expert anyway?

    There are plenty of examples of individual health experts in society.

    A dentist can help a patient understand the best practices for oral health.
    A fitness professional can help a client achieve optimal metabolic health. A nutritionist can tell you what to eat in order to stay healthy. A physical therapist can optimize your recovery from an injury. A orthopedist can
    evaluate bone health. These are but a handful of dozens of examples of individual health specialists.

    Now what can a “public health expert” do for you exactly, and how do you define it?

    Well, that’s when you encounter some roadblocks. If you Google “public health expert definition,” you’ll get 40 different answers from 40 different
    academic and government public health departments. Answers range from “professionals in the field struggle to define public health precisely” to “the science and art of preventing disease.”

    That’s because public health isn’t a real science. Take it from me, as someone who studied another fake form of science (political science) in undergrad. Just as the “common good” is not good for everyone, Public Health
    suffers from the same innate failures as a health concept. What is good for
    Joe may not be good for Jane. What is best for Catherine may not be best for Carlos. An attempt to optimize and perfect “public health” will inevitably result in chaos, as we’ve seen play out over the course of the last year.

    You can thank the “public health experts” for normalizing healthy quarantines, outdoor masking, 6 feet social distancing, nightly curfews, societal lockdowns and plenty of other baseless mystical population control measures that were enforced (and failed to succeed in combating a virus) in
    the name of science.

    Individual health is to public health as liberty is to totalitarianism. The moment you depart from treating individuals, and attempt to collectivize a population, you’re not so much an expert as you are an authoritarian control freak disguised as an expert.

    Fauci is not a public health expert, he’s a power drunk immunologist. Bill Gates is not a public health expert, he’s a maniacal technocrat. The CDC and WHO do not possess public health expertise, they are bloated bureaucracies offering historically poor recommendations for dealing with disease spread
    and other societal issues.

    No one person or group can claim the mantle of public health, and no one
    person or group can claim to know what is best for the collective, just as
    no one leader should make devastating decisions for the “greater good” of society. Self-proclaimed public health experts are really nothing more than aspiring autocrats who happen to populate governments and academic
    departments. Given the lack of actual expertise or competition in those
    fields, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that these same individuals also happen to have atrocious track records when it comes to preventing and
    treating disease spread.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kelsey Bjarnason@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 7 12:34:25 2021
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.politics.usa.misc, talk.politics.drugs
    XPost: talk.politics.medicine

    [snips]

    In article <s464o6$cat$1@dont-email.me>,
    spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au says...

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-public-health-expert

    Lifesite Spews? Seriously? Okay, I assume you're posting
    this for comedic effect...



    April 1, 2021 (The Dossier) ? Since the beginning of
    COVID Mania


    Backed up by the date chosen....

    dealing with pandemics and disease spread. Want to know
    about how to deal
    with COVID-19? Follow orders from the omniscient public health experts, we?re told.

    No idea who is telling you that, but here's a hint: if
    they're using the term "omniscient" in that manner, they
    are *not* people actually recommending listening to the
    recommendations thus offered.


    Well, we?re now over a year into this thing, the free
    world is in shambles,
    and virtually everything recommended by these supposed world-class experts has resulted in complete chaos and devastation.

    Wait, is he completely unaware that the Great Orange
    Shitgibbon was told to get off his worthless ass and do
    something useful, and even told *what* to do, but instead
    the Great Orange Rectal Polyp chose to pretend the whole
    thing was a hoax, do nothing, let's go play another 500
    rounds of golf?

    The ?public health experts? told us that lockdowns were
    the key to our
    salvation. When that didn?t work, they did the same thing with masks, curfews, physical distancing, and the like.

    You can't say something "didn't work" when it was never
    tried at all, or tried but in such a lax fashion it may as
    well not have been tried.

    Hint: you can't have political rallies, bar nights, church
    meets and the like if you're in a lockdown.

    Masks? At what point were masks - and social distancing -
    made a requirement, from a federal standpoint, an backed
    up by anything resembling actual penalities for failure to
    abide by them? Was that before or after the GORP kept
    showing up, unwanted, unmasked, and arguing it was all a
    hoax? "Chinese flu" - does that ring a bell? Is that the
    phrasing of someone treating it as a national crisis?

    No.

    But yeah, let's pretend that the guy who has precisely
    zero power to impose such mandates is the one to blame
    here.

    Tell me you're not actually so fucking stupid you buy that
    narrative.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)