• Your Questions on the College Admission Scandal, Answered.

    From Elizabeth Paige Laurie@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 17 05:14:29 2019
    XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrat, alt.showbiz.gossip
    XPost: sac.sports


    Liberal Democrats, too lazy and stupid to compete
    scholastically. This is the result of the present day inferior
    California school system, once the envy of the entire free
    world, after 40 years of Democrat control and parasitic
    socialist union infestation.

    TAGS: Cheat Lie Bribe Obama Ignorant Liberal Dumb Crime College
    High School Sports USC Coach ACT Democrat LA Times, Washington
    Post, NY Times Elite Hollywood TV Media Twitter youTube Scumbags
    Kiss Your Job Goodbye


    Federal prosecutors on Tuesday charged 50 people in a brazen
    scheme to secure spots at Yale, Stanford and other big-name
    schools in what they called the “largest college admissions scam
    ever prosecuted by the Department of Justice.” They have accused
    dozens of parents of paying millions of dollars in bribes to
    help their children get into the schools.

    For those catching up, or those overwhelmed by the volume of
    news, here’s an overview of The New York Times’s coverage.

    Who was charged in the scandal?
    The ringleader, William Singer: The 59-year-old businessman from
    Newport Beach, Calif., was the founder of a college preparatory
    business, the Edge College & Career Network, and its charity
    arm, the Key Worldwide Foundation. He had been working with
    federal investigators since September.

    Thirty-three parents, many of them high-profile: The parents
    included the television star Lori Loughlin and her husband, the
    fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli; the actress Felicity
    Huffman; and William E. McGlashan Jr., a partner at the private
    equity firm TPG.

    College athletic coaches: They were accused of accepting
    millions of dollars to help admit undeserving students to a wide
    variety of colleges, from the University of Texas at Austin to
    Wake Forest and Georgetown, by suggesting they were top athletes.

    How did the scheme work?
    The system operated by falsifying a student’s test scores or
    fabricating their athletic status. Here’s how the authorities
    say it worked:

    Parents paid for scores: According to prosecutors, parents paid
    between $15,000 and $75,000 for higher test scores. Mr. Singer
    encouraged some parents to get a learning disability waiver for
    their children, which can give students more time to take the
    tests or allow them do so without the regular supervision.

    The cheating went down in three ways: Someone else would take
    the SAT or ACT exams for the student; a person in on the scheme
    would serve as the proctor and guide the students to the right
    answers; or someone would review and correct the students’
    answers after the tests were taken. Many students were not aware
    their answers would be changed, prosecutors said.

    Sports opened a back door to elite colleges: University coaches
    and administrators were paid to secure admission for students
    who may not have even played the sport.

    Athletic achievements and images were doctored: Students’ faces
    were photoshopped onto athletes’ bodies and bogus achievements
    were added to their college applications.

    It was all under wraps: The parents made payments to Mr.
    Singer’s company that were disguised as donations and would be
    funneled through the organization to the universities, allowing
    the parents to claim tax deductions.

    Read more about how the scheme worked, from bribes to doctored

    How did the authorities first learn about all this?
    About a year ago, federal prosecutors in Boston were working on
    a securities fraud case, when their suspect gave them a
    tantalizing bit of information: He knew about a college
    admissions fraud scheme and he could help law enforcement learn
    more, according to a person with knowledge of the case who spoke
    on the condition of anonymity.

    The suspect, who hoped to be granted leniency for his
    cooperation, told them that a college coach had taken bribes to
    secure athletic recruiting spots for prospective students.

    Investigators ran down the tip, and by last April the F.B.I. had
    set up a sting in a Boston hotel room, where they say a Yale
    soccer coach named Rudolph Meredith solicited a $450,000 bribe
    from a parent in exchange for saving a spot for his daughter on
    the team.

    Investigators pressed Mr. Meredith, who led them to an even
    bigger target, Mr. Singer.

    What’s the fallout?
    Mr. Singer has pleaded guilty: He pleaded guilty to counts of
    racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy
    to defraud the United States, and obstruction of justice in
    federal court in Boston on Tuesday. The judge set sentencing for
    June 19, and Mr. Singer was released on a $500,000 bond.

    No charges for students: Federal prosecutors have not charged
    any students or universities with wrongdoing, saying that many
    students were not aware of what their parents were up to. But
    Ms. Loughlin’s daughter, Olivia Jade Giannulli, a social media
    influencer with close to two million YouTube subscribers, is
    drawing scrutiny for her paid posts about college life.

    The parents are facing charges: Many parents were charged with
    conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.
    If they are convicted, their sentences would most likely be
    determined in part by how much they paid. For instance, parents
    who paid $75,000 could get 12 to 18 months in prison, while
    those who paid $500,000 could get 30 to 37 months, according to
    Courtney Oliva, a researcher at the New York University School
    of Law. If the parents plead guilty, the sentences could be
    somewhat shorter.

    Coaches are facing the consequences: The sailing coach at
    Stanford was fired. The U.C.L.A. men’s soccer coach was placed
    on leave, as was the Wake Forest women’s volleyball coach, and
    the men’s tennis coach at the University of Texas. Other coaches
    have also faced disciplinary action.

    U.S.C. faces more scrutiny: This isn’t the first scandal to
    ensnare the University of Southern California, but this time,
    the school is near the epicenter. Four U.S.C. athletic officials
    are charged with taking bribes in the scheme, more than are
    named at any other institution.

    Students are suing: The legal fallout has already spread beyond
    the criminal case, and is probably only beginning. Two Stanford
    University students brought a federal class-action suit on
    Wednesday on behalf of “qualified, rejected” students, accusing
    eight schools of negligence. (The suit was amended on Thursday,
    dropping one plaintiff and adding others with no ties to
    Stanford.) “Each of the universities took the students’
    admission application fees while failing to take adequate steps
    to ensure that their admissions process was fair and free of
    fraud, bribery, cheating and dishonesty,” the lawsuit argues.
    Representatives of the eight universities named as defendants in
    the case declined to comment or did not respond to messages.

    Businesses have responded: Mr. McGlashan was terminated by the
    private equity firm TPG on Thursday, the company said. Gordon
    Caplan, co-chairman of the global law firm Willkie Farr &
    Gallagher, was placed on a leave of absence and his management
    responsibilities were stripped. Another parent, Doug Hodge, the
    retired chief executive of Pimco, one of the world’s biggest
    bond fund managers, was removed from an investment firm’s
    website. On Thursday, two California private schools where Mr.
    Hodge was a board member said they were cutting ties with him.
    The Thatcher School said it had asked Mr. Hodge to step down,
    and the Sage School said he had resigned.
    Other clients are stunned: Mr. Singer’s company’s website
    included testimonials from some of the hundreds of families who
    used its legitimate counseling services, including one from the
    golfer Phil Mickelson, whose daughter Amanda is a sophomore at
    Brown University. Asked about the scandal on Thursday after the
    first round of the Players Championship, Mr. Mickelson said,
    “We’re probably more shocked than anyone.” He said Mr. Singer
    had come well recommended by friends, and did not approach him
    about doing anything fraudulent for his daughter.

    Read more about some titans of finance and law who have been
    swept up in the scandal.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/14/us/college-admissions-scandal- questions.html?module=inline

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)