http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/conspiracy/conspiracy/amwaybush3.shtml

By Evelyn J Pringle

Professor G Robert Blakey was retained as an expert witness in the
1998 Procter & Gamble v Amway lawsuit to issue an opinion on Amway's
business practices. Blakey is one of the nation's foremost authorities
on organized crime and after studying its business structure and
functions, Blakey determined that the Amway business is run in a
manner that is parallel to the businesses run by members of organized
crime, "consisting of associated enterprises engaging in patterns of
legal and illegal activity." Pyramid schemes that include little or no
sales to retail customers are illegal. Because the tool pyramids sell
to Amway distributors only, and not to retail customers, the tool
pyramids are illegal.

And Amway knows they are illegal. Company memos from the early 1980's
that have surfaced in lawsuits, reveal that co-founders Rich DeVos and
Jay Van Andel, were well aware of the illegality of the tool pyramids
operating under the umbrella of Amway. However, they recognized the
enormous power accruing within the pyramids and that the income from
the tool systems was becoming greater than the income from marketing
Amway products. But if they dared to take action against the pyramids,
they feared the kingpins would decide to take their downlines and
leave Amway altogether. When it became clear that the company risked
collapse if it continued to the fight, Amway decided to join the
kingpin distributors in the tool business instead.

Mafia Like Corporate Structure

Professor Blakey determined that Amway uses corporate structures to
protect individuals from liability and to hide the company’s illegal activities. The major families use the corporate form for their tools
business and the Amway sales and marketing business. For example, Don
Wilson has Wilson Enterprises for Amway sales and marketing, and WOW International for tools.

Currently, there are three primary lines of sponsorship within Amway,
headed by Dexter Yager, Bill Britt,* and Ronald Puryear and all three
run their tool pyramids through separate corporations.

While very few of these companies operate under normal corporate
rules, or are bound to each other legally, according to Blakey, "In
order for the business to function, there is an association-in-fact
among the participants. The large family leaders ... work with the
DeVos and Van Andels (Amway Corporation) to ensure the continuing
operation of the business." This association is necessary due to the predictable power struggles, he notes.

Family leaders, much like organized crime groups, hold positions
because of who they are, and not because of any particular job
qualifications. For instance, Blakey reports that when deposed in the
P&G suit, James Rosloniec, a Amway Vice President, supposedly in
charge of audit and control, said he did not know what Amway Financial
Services did, and he had no knowledge of the Amway companies, Amway
Jewelry Company, Amway Realty Network, Group Fifty Corp, Merchandising Products, Nutrilite Products, Nutrilite Products, Limited - New
Zealand, Sunrise Auto Plaza, Taerus Expo Corp, American Way, Limited,
Video Incentives, Plus, or Amway International, Inc.

More often than not, Blakey noted, Rosloniec had little or no
knowledge about the operations of corporations where he was both an
officer and director. Eg, he was a Vice President and director with
HI, Inc; yet in his testimony, he said he "believes" this corporation
owns a Hawaii distribution center, but had never been to a company
meeting or board meeting. He "believes" he is president and treasurer
of Amway Investment, Inc., which has a value in excess of $300
million. He "assumes" he is president of Amway Auditing and Financial
Services, which is a shell corporation.

“All of this indicated that Rosloniec is nothing more than a "shill"
for the DeVos and Van Andel family,” Blakey determined.

Mafia-Like Dispute Resolution

The nature of the Amway corporation lends itself to disputes and just
like the Mafia, Amway families prefer to handle their disputes
internally. There is a formal method of resolution with binding
arbitration, and an informal method, with determinations rendered by
family leaders, Blakey explains.

The formal resolution method is set forth in Amway's Business
Reference Manual. When a problem arises, it is first discussed with
the offender. If the problem persists, it is reported to the
offender’s upline. If it still persists, a warning letter may be
issued, with a copy sent to Amway. If this does not resolve the issue,
a direct distributor may take action, including termination.

If the violator is dissatisfied, he can appeal to Amway for an
informal conciliation procedure. If there is still no resolution, the
panel issues a recommendation. If the party disagrees, he can request
a review by the ADA Board. Upon receipt of a recommendation Amway
reviews the matter and issues a final determination binding on all
parties.

For those who may be interested, the informal method is outlined in
the complaint filed in the 1998 Musgrove lawsuit. The Musgroves
alleged that their upline had illegally taken monies owed to them and
their downlines.

The Musgroves claim they were warned that going to Amway or the ADA
would be a "mistake." When there was no resolution, they went to Jody
Victor - a principal of the ADA. Victor advised them that to cross Don
Wilson or Dexter Yager would be the equivalent of "being drawn and
quartered."

When nothing got resolved, the Musgroves went to Amway, which resulted
in retaliation against them and prompted them to file the lawsuit.

Mafia Methods Of Coercion & Control

Blakey points out that "The Mafia uses "omerta" and violence for
control,” and “Amway uses other tactics, with similar effect." Low-
level distributors must honor their upline. No negative talk or action
is permissible. Paul Klebniov discussed this no-talk-rule in the Dec
9,1991, issue of Forbes Magazine: "Amway's attitude toward any insider
critical of the organization has bordered on paranoia."

According to Blakey's report, a distributor who steps out of line is
punished. He claims, “Punishment may start off with being vilified by
uplines as a "loser," as "negative," or as "brain-dead" which are
typical Amway appelations for anyone who does not believe in the Amway
system and the riches that allegedly flow from it,” he says.

“More serious offenders," says Blakey, "may have portions of their
business taken away - e.g. they can no longer appear at rallies, or
downline distributors are "re-routed."

The Eric Scheibeler Experience

The punishment Blakey described actually happened to Eric Scheibeler
and his wife. In a depositon, the former Amway distributor explains
how he and his wife thought they were joining Amway, but ended up in a
pyramid scheme. "What we didn't realize is that we were in an Amway motivational organization ... to promote, market and retail the system
to our organization. And we personally were used ... to extract
somewhere between three and four million dollars, I'm estimating, of
good people's money that went to books, tapes and seminars, which is
really the real secret income source that our upline Amway diamond was
making money from," he recounts.

Eric describes how "people are brought in based on this incredible
life-style and economic success of the Amway distributors ... when, in
fact, a lot of them don't make a net income of one dollar on Amway.
Almost all their profits come from recruiting - using Amway as a shell corporation to recruit people into their secret motivational
organization, which is where all their income has come from,"
according to his deposition.

In his book Merchants of Deception, Eric said in time he discovered
that "perhaps millions of others had been recruited and induced to
participate in not just one, but two illegal pyramid-type businesses.
The first was the tool business that had no end user outside of the organization, and the second was the Amway business," he said. (The
book can be downloaded from his website, merchantsofdeception.com, for
a limited time only).

Eric tried to do something about the fraud, and says, "I provided
information of fraud, global fraud, to Amway regarding ... forced
participation in the tool business, fraudulent income representations,
and they took no action ... I provided that also to Dick DeVos, the
president of Amway, personally in both fax and certified letter, and
the action they took was cut my income off," he said in his
deposition.

As punishment for speaking out against the company, Amway cut off
their monthly commissions drawn from the organization the Scheilebers
had developed, and withheld about $20,000 while the couple went
bankrupt, lost everything, and barely held onto their home.

At their lowest point, Eric’s sponsor asked him to sign an agreement
stating he would never speak about his experience with Amway again. In
return, Amway would release the $20,000 of the Scheileber’s money the
company claimed it was holding “in escrow," and would buy Eric's Amway
business for $75,000. In a nutshell, they wanted to buy the business
and his silence for $95,000. Eric declined.

Same Coercion & Control Alleged In Lawsuits

This upline coercion and control is alleged in nearly every one of the
many law suits filed all over the country. For instance, the 1998
Taylor v Amway suit alleged that the upline warned the distributors
that they had the authority, political connections and clout to cause
the plaintiffs to lose their business and told distributors to buy
tools and attend functions or they would be "cut out like cancer."

After taking a look at the Van Andel Institute's Website, I'd say Van
Andel indeed had the political ties to make good on such threat. The
site lists Van Andel's history in politics: "In 1992, President George
Bush appointed Jay to serve as the United States Ambassador and
Commissioner General to the Genoa Expo '92 in Genoa, Italy. He has
also served as Chairman of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a Director of
the Gerald R. Ford Foundation, a member of the U.S.O. World of
Governors, and North American Chairman of the Netherlands American
Bicentennial Commission," it says.

The complaint filed in the Stewart v Amway case alleges the uplines
coerced attendance at functions, controlled by family leaders, and
anyone trying to hold events independent of high level approved
functions was "blackballed" from participating in other events.

In the 1998 Morrison v Amway case, 29 distributors filed the suit and
revealed many of the company's secrets. The suit alleges downlines are
coerced into spending money on tapes and functions and told that they
have no chance of success unless they do and that those who ask
questions or refuse to play the game risk having their businesses
destroyed

For those who may be interested, the complaint in the 1998 New
Hampshire case of Lavoie v Yager, details on the inner working of the
Yager tool system and also outlines the progression of a distributor
through the system.

Report of Actual Violence

Blakey found, "There are also reports of violence against those who
attempt to take action against Amway." For example, Edward Engel was
Amway's chief financial officer until he resigned in 1979, over a
disagreement with DeVos and Van Andel. Engels claims he and his family
received threats for years after his resignation. "It was a Big
Brother organization," says Engel today. "Everyone assumed that the
phones were tapped, and that Amway had something on everybody."

In 1983, while Engel's former secretary, Dorothy Edgar, was helping
the Canadian authorities in their investigation of Amway, “She was
roughed up in Chicago, after she was told to "stay away from Amway."
Engel picked her up after the incident and says he believes her story, according to Paul Klebniov‘s article.

In 1982, former Amway distributor, Philip Kerns, quit the company and
wrote an expose called "Fake it Till You Make It." He claims Amway had
private detectives follow him and rough him up. The expose prompted
Phil Donahue and 60 Minutes to run highly critical programs about
Amway.

The many examples of threats, intimidation, blackmail, and violence
outlined above definitely mimic attempts to control with methods often
used by members of the Mafia.

Eric says there was one question that had haunted him “How could this
have possibly gone on for so long?” After delving into the company's
political connections he discovered the answer. His book reveals the
close ties between Amway, the Republican Party, and both Bush
administrations. According to Eric, over the past 20 years, there have
been huge contributions and large speaking fees paid to prominent
Republicans, which have resulted in immunity and protection for Amway
against investigations into its violations of anti-pyramid scheme
statutes.

If not for this prepaid-insurance, I firmly believe that Amway would
have been shut down 20 years ago.

* (Part 1 of this article contains the statement: "Bill Britt has
since been booted out of Amway." It should have said, according to a
tape recorded message by Triple Diamond Ron Puryear, leader of World
Wide Dream Builders, Bill Britt, retired from the Amway IBOA board of
directors in June of 2004. The announcement occurred just after the
board of directors met in its June session, where Britt was supposedly approached by other directors about compromising personal issues
relating to two 911 emergency calls made by a woman reporting
disputes. His speaking fees from World Wide Dreambuilders functions
have ended since he won't be speaking at those seminars any longer.)

*************

(Evelyn Pringle is a columnist for Independent Media TV and an
investigative journalist focused on exposing corporate and government corruption.)

Source: http://www.scoop.co.nz

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)