• Windows XP 5.1.2600 won't go on the network

    From Lawrence Aracabia@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 15 02:13:51 2021
    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when booting
    but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to the Interbnet.

    Also I can only use Wi-Fi security from my phone where I can set the
    security to none since it won't connect to any modern Wi-Fi WPA2-PSK router security (I'm traveling so I don't have access to my own router).

    Start > Run > winver
    Version 5.1 (build 2600.xpsp_sp3_dgr_130307-0422 : Service Pack 3)

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet?
    (2) How can I get that WinXP to connect to a typical WPA2-PSK access point?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Lawrence Aracabia on Sun Nov 14 21:35:57 2021
    "Lawrence Aracabia" <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote

    | My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    | (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet?
    | (2) How can I get that WinXP to connect to a typical WPA2-PSK access
    point?

    I'm using Firefox 52.9 and New Moon 28.10.

    http://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

    I don't know about the router issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gfretwell@aol.com@21:1/5 to LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com on Mon Nov 15 00:45:18 2021
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:13:51 +0100, Lawrence Aracabia <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when booting
    but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to the Interbnet.

    Also I can only use Wi-Fi security from my phone where I can set the
    security to none since it won't connect to any modern Wi-Fi WPA2-PSK router >security (I'm traveling so I don't have access to my own router).

    Start > Run > winver
    Version 5.1 (build 2600.xpsp_sp3_dgr_130307-0422 : Service Pack 3)

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet? >(2) How can I get that WinXP to connect to a typical WPA2-PSK access point?

    Is the WiFi radio enabled? Does it see any networks?
    Will it work with a cable in the ethernet port?
    That will get you started down the right path.
    If the ethernet works you have a WiFi thing. I would start by looking
    for a WiFi switch. There is probably an LED that says the radio is on.
    Then look at the control panel and see what it says about a WiFi
    connection.
    You may be reloading a driver or something if the hardware looks OK.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charlie+@21:1/5 to gfretwell@aol.com on Mon Nov 15 07:03:43 2021
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:45:18 -0500, gfretwell@aol.com wrote as
    underneath :

    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:13:51 +0100, Lawrence Aracabia ><LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when booting >>but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to the Interbnet.

    Also I can only use Wi-Fi security from my phone where I can set the >>security to none since it won't connect to any modern Wi-Fi WPA2-PSK router >>security (I'm traveling so I don't have access to my own router).

    Start > Run > winver
    Version 5.1 (build 2600.xpsp_sp3_dgr_130307-0422 : Service Pack 3)

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet? >>(2) How can I get that WinXP to connect to a typical WPA2-PSK access point?

    Is the WiFi radio enabled? Does it see any networks?
    Will it work with a cable in the ethernet port?
    That will get you started down the right path.
    If the ethernet works you have a WiFi thing. I would start by looking
    for a WiFi switch. There is probably an LED that says the radio is on.
    Then look at the control panel and see what it says about a WiFi
    connection.
    You may be reloading a driver or something if the hardware looks OK.

    A modern Wi-Fi dongle(USB) should have the necessary WPA2 software and
    firmware to run correctly on XP, I don't think you will be able to find
    modern drivers for XP age wireless internal card, as a work around for
    that part of your problem, and just disable the old internal Wi-Fi card.
    C+

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gfretwell@aol.com@21:1/5 to charlie@xxx.net on Mon Nov 15 02:26:14 2021
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 07:03:43 +0000, Charlie+ <charlie@xxx.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:45:18 -0500, gfretwell@aol.com wrote as
    underneath :

    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:13:51 +0100, Lawrence Aracabia >><LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when booting >>>but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to the Interbnet. >>>
    Also I can only use Wi-Fi security from my phone where I can set the >>>security to none since it won't connect to any modern Wi-Fi WPA2-PSK router >>>security (I'm traveling so I don't have access to my own router).

    Start > Run > winver
    Version 5.1 (build 2600.xpsp_sp3_dgr_130307-0422 : Service Pack 3)

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet? >>>(2) How can I get that WinXP to connect to a typical WPA2-PSK access point? >>
    Is the WiFi radio enabled? Does it see any networks?
    Will it work with a cable in the ethernet port?
    That will get you started down the right path.
    If the ethernet works you have a WiFi thing. I would start by looking
    for a WiFi switch. There is probably an LED that says the radio is on.
    Then look at the control panel and see what it says about a WiFi >>connection.
    You may be reloading a driver or something if the hardware looks OK.

    A modern Wi-Fi dongle(USB) should have the necessary WPA2 software and >firmware to run correctly on XP, I don't think you will be able to find >modern drivers for XP age wireless internal card, as a work around for
    that part of your problem, and just disable the old internal Wi-Fi card.
    C+

    My old XP Thinkpad doesn't have any problem using Firefox and the
    drivers that came with it. I have connected to routers all over the
    country. I only stopped using it because the plane wants W/7 to get to
    the entertainment. (Delta GoGo)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com on Mon Nov 15 09:25:42 2021
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 02:13:51 +0100, Lawrence Aracabia <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet?

    I use three browsers with Win XP.

    I use Firefox v41 where possible, but it says many sites have insecure connections. Some will allow you to connect anyway, others dfon't.

    I use Maxthon for Facebook and FamilySearch, though it is slow and
    clunky and keeps missing or losing the connection to the DNS server.
    And Avast blocks many sites because they have not updated their
    certificate and so are insecure.

    I use Opera for Twitter, and a few other sites. It connects with
    Facebook, but Facebook will not allow it to comment -- it can reply to
    other comments, though. It also reports lots of problems with sites
    with expired certificates.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence Aracabia@21:1/5 to gfretwell@aol.com on Mon Nov 15 12:51:20 2021
    <gfretwell@aol.com> wrote:

    Is the WiFi radio enabled?

    Yes. I can connect to an open network just fine (which is why I must use my phone as I'm traveling and therefore I have no access to anyone's router).

    Does it see any networks?

    Yes. It sees all of them. It just doesn't have WPA2-PSK ability.

    Will it work with a cable in the ethernet port?
    That will get you started down the right path.

    I don't have physical access to anyone's router but that isn't the problem anyway since it won't connect to WPA2-PSK as it doesn't even have that
    option.

    If the ethernet works you have a WiFi thing.

    The Wi-Fi clearly doesn't support WPA2-PSK. That's all I need.
    I'm just not familiar with HOW to get it, especially with all the browser certificates expired.

    I would start by looking for a WiFi switch. There is probably an LED that says the radio is on.
    Then look at the control panel and see what it says about a WiFi
    connection.
    You may be reloading a driver or something if the hardware looks OK.

    The laptop hasn't been used in 10 or 15 years which is apparently older
    than WPA2-PSK existed so all it needs is that capability but I don't know
    how to add it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence Aracabia@21:1/5 to Mayayana on Mon Nov 15 12:46:08 2021
    Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    I'm using Firefox 52.9 and New Moon 28.10.

    I tried Firefox and it still wouldn't connect to httpS web sites.

    There seems to be a problem with old "certificates" as only http sites
    work. The laptop had not been used in probably 10 or 15 years.

    Is there a way to "check" & "update" the certificates for any given
    browser?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Lawrence Aracabia on Mon Nov 15 08:14:06 2021
    On 11/14/2021 8:13 PM, Lawrence Aracabia wrote:
    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when booting
    but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to the Interbnet.

    Also I can only use Wi-Fi security from my phone where I can set the
    security to none since it won't connect to any modern Wi-Fi WPA2-PSK router security (I'm traveling so I don't have access to my own router).

    Start > Run > winver
    Version 5.1 (build 2600.xpsp_sp3_dgr_130307-0422 : Service Pack 3)

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the Internet? (2) How can I get that WinXP to connect to a typical WPA2-PSK access point?


    A popular security certificate expired not long ago,
    and this has caused major browser havoc for WinXP.

    ISRG... Not the LetsEncrypt itself.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20210922081352/https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/21/lets-encrypt-root-expiry/

    *******

    Using a second computer running a newer OS, consider acquiring
    Firefox 52ESR. There's a table of values here, and this site
    thinks Firefox > 50 will work. Since WinXP only has a working
    Firefox up to 52ESR, then that is as far as you can go.

    https://support.freshteam.com/support/solutions/articles/19000130292-troubleshooting-connection-not-secure-error

    >50, <= 52ESR

    So that would be here.

    http://releases.mozilla.com/pub/firefox/releases/52.9.0esr/win32/en-US/

    Firefox Setup 52.9.0esr.exe 43M 25-Jun-2018 08:56

    Why is there a SHA1 reference here ? Dunno. This could be the same file.

    http://releases.mozilla.com/pub/firefox/releases/52.9.0esr/win32-sha1/en-US/

    Firefox Setup 52.9.0esr.exe 43M 25-Jun-2018 08:57

    The reason Firefox can work, is Firefox has its own certificate store.

    I tested the item from the first download link, and at least
    it installed. I can't tell whether it will open the broken sites
    or not. But you can try it. Once you get a cable or the Wifi working.

    I had major problems with Windows Update in WinXP. There is a looping
    bug, which presumably some clever Microsoft employee had a hand in.
    The server it is trying to reach, is an http one, but perhaps
    there is an https redirect and it doesn't even bother showing what it has
    done on the screen.

    I tried to use my wsusoffline, made a number of years ago, but
    maybe I have to pick up an ESR from the site and get the
    latest changes, if anyone bothered. They're not really supposed
    to be supporting that any more. Wsusoffline consults Windows Update,
    so does not "force" the updates in, which is a shame, because
    as soon as Microsoft ruins WU, then Wsusoffline is ruined too.

    Even if I installed MBSA 2.3, the wsusscn2.cab is protected with SHA2
    now, and MBSA 2.3 cannot handle that. It should be dead in the water
    too, not because the software is broken, but because the .cab it
    is downloading is boobytrapped (designed to fail, when parsed).

    Summary: Running WinXP ? Good God. It's like a field full of land mines now.
    What a mess. So if someone tells you to "clean install when buying
    a used laptop", I think you know what my answer is for WinXP...

    Find a copy of Win7 and DAZ Loader.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Lawrence Aracabia on Mon Nov 15 08:26:48 2021
    "Lawrence Aracabia" <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote

    | I tried Firefox and it still wouldn't connect to httpS web sites.
    |
    | There seems to be a problem with old "certificates" as only http sites
    | work. The laptop had not been used in probably 10 or 15 years.
    |
    | Is there a way to "check" & "update" the certificates for any given
    | browser?

    I updated mine according to this webpage:

    https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/

    I don't know whether it made a critical difference. Maybe it did.
    But there's also the issue of bad certs and you need to make sure
    FF gives you the option to bypass its warnings. I don't remember
    the details of that offhand, but in some cases you can just get
    a refusal to load the page. Yet in most cases that's due to recently
    outdated certs or certs a small website is using that are not in its
    name.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence Aracabia@21:1/5 to Mayayana on Mon Nov 15 16:55:06 2021
    Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    I updated mine according to this webpage:

    https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/

    Thanks for that advice as I think the problem with the WinXP web browsers is that there are no
    valid certificates, and I think the problem with the WinXP wi-fi may be that there is no option
    to set the security to WPA2-PSK (or even WPA2 since it goes by various names).

    (1) I created the phone mobile hotspot "hotspot1" which I set with no protection
    (2) I ran in the phone termux shell "ifconfig" whose results are below
    (3) "inet 192.168.27.227 netbask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.27.227"
    (4) I connected winxp wi-fi to that mobile phone access point "hotspot1"
    (5) The winxp "ipconfig" showed the wrong IP address subnet so I rebooted
    (6) Back up & on Wi-Fi, the WinXP subnet was still wrong at 192.168.86.229
    (7) A winxp ipconfig /release and then /renew didn't help things at all
    (8) I set WinXP for the same 27 subnet & 227 gateway via the control panel
    (9) 192.168.27.229/255.255.255.0 & gateway 192.168.27.227 & DNS 8.8.8.8/8.8.4.4 (10) On WinXP I pinged 192.168.27.227 & www.google.com successfully
    (11) On WinXP I brought up firefox esr 52.9.0 (32-bit)
    (12) In FF 52.9.0 I went to https://msfn.org (note the httpS)
    (13) Predictably the error was "Your connection is not secure"
    (14) In FF I pressed Advanced, Add Exception, Get Certificate,& Confirm Security Exception" and the home page came up.
    (15) In FF I went to your helpful URL & read the moderator comment below

    The download for the latest (1.6) version of Heinoganda's root certificates and revoked certificates update utility is here -
    https://www.mediafire.com/file/pflkq12ik8tlx5w/jveWB2Qg1Lt9yT5m3CYpZ8b8N4rH.rar/file
    The archive password is: S4QH5TIefi7m9n1XLyTIZ3V5hSv4se1XB6jJZpH5TfB6vkJ8hfRxU7DWB2p

    (16) Going to that mediafire URL I again got "Your connection is not secure" (17) I hit Advanced, Add Exception, Get Certificate, Confirm Security Exception (18) I pressed the blue "Download" button labeled jveWB2Qg1Lt9yT5m3CYpZ8b8N4rH (19) Again I received "Your connection is not secure" & again I added the certificate.
    (20) That downloaded the following 1,659KB RAR file https://download2279.mediafire.com/blogpk1hizug/pflkq12ik8tlx5w/jveWB2Qg1Lt9yT5m3CYpZ8b8N4rH.rar
    (21) Right clicking and selecting IZArc to extract asked for the password shown above
    (22) The "Important please read.txt" implied I should ignore the "DL_URL_UPD.reg" file
    (23) The "Info Version 1.6.txt" provided version information (bugfixes & the like)
    (24) I clicked on the remaining file "Cert_Updater_v1.6.exe" & pressed "Yes" (25) Resulting in "Roots Certificates" & "Revoked Certificates" are "successfuyllty updated"

    I went to www.oogle.com in FF 52.9.0 and it still said it was an insecure connection.
    I killed and restarted Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32-bit) but it still said the same thing.
    That still said "insecure connection" so I rebooted WinXP.
    After I restarted WinXP and reconnected, FF STILL gives me that insecure connection warning.
    So I did a "Turn Off" of the PC so that I could cold boot to Windows XP.

    After the cold boot I connected Windows XP SP3 to the phone wi-fi access point. I checked the ping to the phone gateway and to www.google.com and they worked fine.
    Yet Firefox 52.9.0 ESR (32-bit) STILl complained about security
    https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl
    But the error is different now:
    Error code: MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_NOT_YET_VALID_ISSUER_CERTIFICATE
    Clicking on those words it says:
    A certificate that is not yet valid was used to issue the server's certificate.
    HTTP Strict Transport Security: false
    HTTP Public Key Pinning: true

    I checked the date of the Windows XP computer and it said "Sat 07/09/2016" which I then changed to 11-15-21 (and I checked that it took which it did).

    THEN, when I went to "www.google.com' in Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32-bit), it worked!
    I went to news.google.com so I could click on current links, which worked! SRWARE Iron Version 49.0.2600.0 also worked when clicking around in news.google.com!
    Internet Explorer 8 version 8.0.6001.18702 also worked albeit it was super slow.
    Worse with Opera 36.0.2130.80 which hung every time that on news.google.com site.

    After another cold boot I checked again before posting my results above.
    (The current date stuck, so it looks like the PC hasn't been used since 2016.)

    Was my browser problem, all along, that the date was stuck way back in 2016? Even so, when I connect to a typical home WPA2-PSK secured access point, I get
    "Windows was unable to find a certificate to log you on to the network"

    When I try to set up the wi-fi connection the only choices winxp provides are
    Automatically assign a network key (recommended)
    Manually assign a network key
    Use WPA encrfyption instgead of WEP

    Overall, were all my web problems only related to the date or to the certificates?
    And, how do I get the option for WPA2-PSK encryption in Windows XP SP3?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Lawrence Aracabia on Mon Nov 15 16:18:50 2021
    On 11/15/2021 10:55 AM, Lawrence Aracabia wrote:


    Overall, were all my web problems only related to the date or to the certificates?
    And, how do I get the option for WPA2-PSK encryption in Windows XP SP3?

    There are things on the computer that are date sensitive,
    so yes, having the date off by a large amount would be
    a bad thing.

    If you didn't pull the time in sufficiently, perhaps even
    this would not work.

    https://time.gov/

    There is a graphic on the lower-right, showing the time error
    between you and a decent-stratum clock at the gov site.

    *******

    https://kb.netgear.com/20021/Enabling-Wireless-Zero-Config-WZC-on-Windows-XP

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_Zero_Configuration

    "It was later integrated into Windows XP Service Pack 3"

    https://www.dlink.com.vn/how-do-i-configure-wpa-psk-on-my-wireless-card-using-the-microsoft-xp-utility-2/

    "How do I configure WPA-PSK on my wireless card using the Microsoft XP Utility?

    Note: Make sure to have all of the latest Windows Updates.

    Step 1 Click on the XP Networking icon to use the Zero Configuration utility.
    This will be located in the lower-right corner (system tray). In the
    lower-left of the window, click on the Advanced button.

    Step 2 Ensure that Use Windows to configure my wireless network settings
    is checked. Highlight the network you wish to connect to and click
    on the Configure button.

    Step 3 From the Network Authentication drop-down, select WPA-PSK. Under
    Data Encryption, select TKIP or AES. Enter your Network key and
    enter it again next to Confirm network key.
    "

    This implies some level of support in WZC, at a first glance.
    I bet the hardware plays a part too though. At least some
    of the crypto had a hardware component. Or so it was claimed
    in a past time.

    With WZC turned off, it may be up to the proprietary driver to
    provide config panels. With WZC on, who knows, sometimes the
    stuff just works.

    I have no Wifi to speak of here, just the one laptop with a Wifi
    on it. Nothing else, no Wifi router, to experiment with. I do
    more BT-send than Wifi :-)

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com on Tue Nov 16 06:36:05 2021
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:46:08 +0100, Lawrence Aracabia <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    I'm using Firefox 52.9 and New Moon 28.10.

    I tried Firefox and it still wouldn't connect to httpS web sites.

    There seems to be a problem with old "certificates" as only http sites
    work. The laptop had not been used in probably 10 or 15 years.

    Is there a way to "check" & "update" the certificates for any given
    browser?

    Larger sites seem to update their certificates, but many smaller sites
    do not.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Lawrence Aracabia on Tue Nov 16 08:12:56 2021
    "Lawrence Aracabia" <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote

    | Overall, were all my web problems only related to the date or to the certificates?

    I'm not sure about that. I just remember the certificate update
    being possible and I figured it couldn't hurt to update them. The
    date problem is something that never occurred to me.

    | And, how do I get the option for WPA2-PSK encryption in Windows XP SP3?

    I'm afraid that's something I don't remember. I look into
    the encryption issues when I buy a new router and then
    I promptly forget the whole thing. I find that the older I get,
    the less room there is in my mind to store such information.
    I don't know, offhand, what encryption I'm using, but I've
    never had problems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 17 21:31:20 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 08:26:48, Mayayana <mayayana@invalid.nospam>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    "Lawrence Aracabia" <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote

    | I tried Firefox and it still wouldn't connect to httpS web sites.
    |
    | There seems to be a problem with old "certificates" as only http sites
    | work. The laptop had not been used in probably 10 or 15 years.
    |
    | Is there a way to "check" & "update" the certificates for any given
    | browser?

    I updated mine according to this webpage:

    https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certif >icates-for-windows-xp/
    []
    Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7? I get quite a lot
    of cases where I have to accept the exception (or something like that)
    but then it works; in (I think it is) the last week or two, I've had a
    few that just won't connect, and don't give me the option to override
    the warning.

    (I ask because it looks as if it's for Windows rather than Firefox, and
    I've heard Firefox uses its own independent certificate store [if that's
    the right term].)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    We shall never - never! - allow foreigners to run our economy. They might cure it. (George Mikes, "How to be Decadent" [1977].)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Thu Nov 18 05:53:36 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:31:20 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7? I get quite a lot
    of cases where I have to accept the exception (or something like that)
    but then it works; in (I think it is) the last week or two, I've had a
    few that just won't connect, and don't give me the option to override
    the warning.

    (I ask because it looks as if it's for Windows rather than Firefox, and
    I've heard Firefox uses its own independent certificate store [if that's
    the right term].)

    Yes, I use three browsers with Windows XP. Opera connects to Twitter,
    Firefox doesn't. I use Maxthon for FamilySearch, but it keeps warning
    me that Avast has blocked access to a subsidiary site because of an
    expired certificate. But Maxthon seems to have DNS trouble. I also use
    an older version of Frirefox (v41) but it fails to connect to some
    sites too.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 18 06:23:27 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 05:53:36, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:31:20 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" ><G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7? I get quite a lot
    []
    (I ask because it looks as if it's for Windows rather than Firefox, and
    []
    Yes, I use three browsers with Windows XP. Opera connects to Twitter,
    Firefox doesn't. I use Maxthon for FamilySearch, but it keeps warning
    []
    So _will_ the suggested method work for old-F-on-W7?
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    One of my tricks as an armchair futurist is to "predict" things that are already happening and watch people tell me it will never happen.
    Scott Adams, 2015-3-9

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Fri Nov 19 04:36:51 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 06:23:27 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 05:53:36, Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 21:31:20 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" >><G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7? I get quite a lot
    []
    (I ask because it looks as if it's for Windows rather than Firefox, and
    []
    Yes, I use three browsers with Windows XP. Opera connects to Twitter, >>Firefox doesn't. I use Maxthon for FamilySearch, but it keeps warning
    []
    So _will_ the suggested method work for old-F-on-W7?

    I think the site owner has to update the certificates.

    If your laptop is using W7 you can probably update Firefox, but you
    might run into problems because of software bloat -- each update of a
    priogram seems to require more memory than the last, and nowadays I
    often go and make coffee while waiting for a web site to CLOSE.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Fri Nov 19 08:43:41 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote

    | >I updated mine according to this webpage:
    | >
    | >https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certif
    | >icates-for-windows-xp/
    | []
    | Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7? I get quite a lot
    | of cases where I have to accept the exception (or something like that)
    | but then it works; in (I think it is) the last week or two, I've had a
    | few that just won't connect, and don't give me the option to override
    | the warning.
    |
    | (I ask because it looks as if it's for Windows rather than Firefox, and
    | I've heard Firefox uses its own independent certificate store [if that's
    | the right term].)

    I can't answer that. I came across the cert issue at one point
    and did the update. But personally I've never had the problem
    of widespread cert rejection that some people talk about.
    (FF 52 and New Moon 28) Did the cert update help? I'm afraid I
    just don't know. You may be correct that only IE, winhttp, wininet,
    and various other system Internet functionality can benefit.

    Like you I sometimes get the warnings. There's another trick that
    I don't remember offhand to make sure that you get the option
    to override. (Firefox gets more daffy all the time.) But you should see
    the reason for the warning in that page, too. It's almost always one
    of two things:
    1) The cert recently expired and hasn't been updated. 2) The cert
    is someone else's. In the second case the problem is usually that MarysMassage.com or EdsHuntingMemorabilia.com are hosted on
    CheapHosting.com and their cert is registered to CheapHosting.com,
    because getting your own cert is complicated. Firefox then sees
    that as a suspicious cert.

    Does any of this matter? Not really. If you're going to type in a
    credit card number it's important. If you're going to look at photos
    of Ed's antique guns then the only risk is that a man in the middle
    hack could see the content of the webpage you're visiting. As they
    say sometimes in the US but probably not in Britain: Big whoop!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Apd@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 19 16:17:49 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 08:26:48, Mayayana wrote:
    I updated mine according to this webpage:
    <https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-certificates-for-windows-xp/>
    []
    Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7?

    No. FF has its own cert store.

    I get quite a lot of cases where I have to accept the exception (or
    something like that) but then it works; in (I think it is) the last
    week or two, I've had a few that just won't connect, and don't give
    me the option to override the warning.

    Depending on how old your FF is, it may not support the encryption
    algorithm the site wants to use. No amount of updated certs will help
    with that and FF won't be able to override. It might be useful if you
    could note here which URLs are giving trouble and what version of FF
    you're using.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Apd on Fri Nov 19 12:31:45 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Apd" <not@all.invalid> wrote

    | Depending on how old your FF is, it may not support the encryption
    | algorithm the site wants to use.

    Why do you think that? TLS 1.3 was added in FF 49. In 52.9
    I have security.tls.version.max set to 4 and fallback-limit set
    to 3. 1.3 was new 2 years ago. I'm not aware of any TLS 1.4.
    Even when the latest isn't supported, sites should use the next
    one down. Some sites won't support 1.1, for example.

    (The settings add 1 to the level because 1.0 is 1. So 1.2
    is 3 and 1.3 is 4.)

    I seem to remember that some people were using things like
    FF 28. But that still supports 1.2. Anyone who thinks they may have
    trouble can check about:config to make sure they're running at
    full capacity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Apd@21:1/5 to Mayayana on Fri Nov 19 20:14:43 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Mayayana" wrote:
    "Apd" wrote:
    | Depending on how old your FF is, it may not support the encryption
    | algorithm the site wants to use.

    Why do you think that?

    It's another thing to consider. Each TLS version specifies various
    cyphers (cypher suite) that can be used. I don't know what obligation
    a server has in the way of full support for all in any given TLS
    version or if a browser would implement them all. Perhaps someone can
    clarify. I know I've had the odd message that a particular cypher
    was not understood (may not have been Firefox).

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher_suite

    TLS 1.3 was added in FF 49. In 52.9
    I have security.tls.version.max set to 4 and fallback-limit set
    to 3. 1.3 was new 2 years ago. I'm not aware of any TLS 1.4.
    Even when the latest isn't supported, sites should use the next
    one down. Some sites won't support 1.1, for example.

    Exactly.

    (The settings add 1 to the level because 1.0 is 1. So 1.2
    is 3 and 1.3 is 4.)

    The default in FF 52.9 is 3 so I wonder if 1.3 is fully supported.

    I seem to remember that some people were using things like
    FF 28. But that still supports 1.2. Anyone who thinks they may have
    trouble can check about:config to make sure they're running at
    full capacity.

    I believe JPG is/was using a very old ver of FF.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Apd on Fri Nov 19 17:44:58 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Apd" <not@all.invalid> wrote

    |
    | > (The settings add 1 to the level because 1.0 is 1. So 1.2
    | > is 3 and 1.3 is 4.)
    |
    | The default in FF 52.9 is 3 so I wonder if 1.3 is fully supported.

    Look it up. FF 49. The reason it defaults to 3 (TLS 1.2)
    is because 4 (1.3) is fairly new and may not be supported
    everywhere. The browser is supposed to do a "handshake",
    offering what versions it supports, then the server picks the
    highest that it supports. So there shouldn't be any problems.
    Except possibly with assholes like Google who love to tell you
    last week's browser is not sufficient.

    Anyone using FF 52 should set the default to 4 (TLS 1.3)
    and the fallback to 3. Then all sites should be able to
    handle it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Apd@21:1/5 to Mayayana on Sat Nov 20 00:29:23 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Mayayana" wrote:
    "Apd" wrote
    | The default in FF 52.9 is 3 so I wonder if 1.3 is fully supported.

    Look it up. FF 49.

    I have, and before FF 63 they were draft versions. Bugzilla mentioned
    some compatability issues but stated "It's fairly safe to flip the
    pref if you know what to expect".

    Anyone using FF 52 should set the default to 4 (TLS 1.3)
    and the fallback to 3. Then all sites should be able to
    handle it.

    I take it you haven't had problems so I'll try it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to Apd on Sat Nov 20 04:59:32 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:17:49 -0000, "Apd" <not@all.invalid> wrote:

    Depending on how old your FF is, it may not support the encryption
    algorithm the site wants to use. No amount of updated certs will help
    with that and FF won't be able to override. It might be useful if you
    could note here which URLs are giving trouble and what version of FF
    you're using.

    One that none of my browsers will override is

    http://www.oca.org

    Firefox reports an expired certificate, and won't override.

    Maxthon reports that Avast has blocked it.

    Opera does something similar.

    Firefox 41 still gets me into Google & Wordpress, and most pages of
    GoodReads, other than book description pages, which won't display
    properly.







    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Fri Nov 19 23:58:18 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On 11/19/2021 9:59 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:17:49 -0000, "Apd" <not@all.invalid> wrote:

    Depending on how old your FF is, it may not support the encryption
    algorithm the site wants to use. No amount of updated certs will help
    with that and FF won't be able to override. It might be useful if you
    could note here which URLs are giving trouble and what version of FF
    you're using.

    One that none of my browsers will override is

    http://www.oca.org

    Firefox reports an expired certificate, and won't override.

    Maxthon reports that Avast has blocked it.

    Opera does something similar.

    Firefox 41 still gets me into Google & Wordpress, and most pages of GoodReads, other than book description pages, which won't display
    properly.

    Sent this link:

    https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.oca.org

    Five minutes later, the report, a part of which is...

    https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.oca.org&s=45.79.144.159 <=== returned result

    Mozilla (but the Windows entry is the same)

    Path #1: Trusted
    1 Sent by server oca.org
    Fingerprint SHA256: a72baf3558270f9629b28f5beda73defc54ceddc54d5237ae6b9064644e57cb4
    Pin SHA256: I3N6VhKN9Hxzh6f1I2Kq6ZZBtYGbdhMLiED3t8u7NLs=
    RSA 2048 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA
    2 Sent by server R3
    Fingerprint SHA256: 67add1166b020ae61b8f5fc96813c04c2aa589960796865572a3c7e737613dfd
    Pin SHA256: jQJTbIh0grw0/1TkHSumWb+Fs0Ggogr621gT3PvPKG0=
    RSA 2048 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA
    3 In trust store ISRG Root X1 Self-signed
    Fingerprint SHA256: 96bcec06264976f37460779acf28c5a7cfe8a3c0aae11a8ffcee05c0bddf08c6
    Pin SHA256: C5+lpZ7tcVwmwQIMcRtPbsQtWLABXhQzejna0wHFr8M=
    RSA 4096 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA

    Path #2: Not trusted (invalid certificate [Fingerprint SHA256:
    0687260331a72403d909f105e69bcf0d32e1bd2493ffc6d9206d11bcd6770739])
    1 Sent by server oca.org
    Fingerprint SHA256: a72baf3558270f9629b28f5beda73defc54ceddc54d5237ae6b9064644e57cb4
    Pin SHA256: I3N6VhKN9Hxzh6f1I2Kq6ZZBtYGbdhMLiED3t8u7NLs=
    RSA 2048 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA
    2 Sent by server R3
    Fingerprint SHA256: 67add1166b020ae61b8f5fc96813c04c2aa589960796865572a3c7e737613dfd
    Pin SHA256: jQJTbIh0grw0/1TkHSumWb+Fs0Ggogr621gT3PvPKG0=
    RSA 2048 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA
    3 Sent by server ISRG Root X1
    Fingerprint SHA256: 6d99fb265eb1c5b3744765fcbc648f3cd8e1bffafdc4c2f99b9d47cf7ff1c24f
    Pin SHA256: C5+lpZ7tcVwmwQIMcRtPbsQtWLABXhQzejna0wHFr8M=
    RSA 4096 bits (e 65537) / SHA256withRSA
    4 In trust store DST Root CA X3 Self-signed
    Fingerprint SHA256: 0687260331a72403d909f105e69bcf0d32e1bd2493ffc6d9206d11bcd6770739
    Pin SHA256: Vjs8r4z+80wjNcr1YKepWQboSIRi63WsWXhIMN+eWys=
    RSA 2048 bits (e 65537) / SHA1withRSA
    Valid until: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 14:01:15 UTC
    EXPIRED
    Weak or insecure signature, but no impact on root certificate

    Which sure looks like the handiwork of LetsEncrypt certificate scheme.
    Even though their name isn't mentioned in the listing. I think the
    ISRG Root is theirs.

    The site gets a grade of "B" because it supports TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1,
    as well as the others. At least it cuts off SSL2 and SSL3. The expired certificate likely doesn't modify the rating.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Apd@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Nov 20 11:54:22 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Steve Hayes" wrote:
    One that none of my browsers will override is

    http://www.oca.org

    Firefox reports an expired certificate, and won't override.

    The site is using certs from LetsEncrypt and there were problems with
    them recently. The ones they present to my FF 52.9 are ok. In Paul's
    report there is mention of DST Root CA X3 which is now expired. Your
    browser should not be trying to use that.

    Your browser should be using updated certs from ISRG (LetsEncrypt);
    in particular, these should do the job:

    - ISRG Root X1 (Self-signed)
    - Let's Encrypt R3 (Signed by ISRG Root X1)

    Get them from: <https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/> and install
    into Firefox. You may also want to install them in WinXP.

    Maxthon reports that Avast has blocked it.

    Opera does something similar.

    They would also need updating. I don't know if they use in-browser
    certs like Firefox or the system ones.

    Firefox 41 still gets me into Google & Wordpress, and most pages of GoodReads, other than book description pages, which won't display
    properly.

    The most recent Firefox which runs on XP is 52.9 and I don't recall
    needing to update its certs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sat Nov 20 08:56:03 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Steve Hayes" <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote

    | One that none of my browsers will override is
    |
    | http://www.oca.org

    Like Apd, it works fine for me in FF 52.9. Why not
    update? I know they broke a lot of things, but there
    are extensions.

    The site is an unholy mess, I must say, for a Christian
    organization. :) But that's not uncommon these days.

    I'm still having a hard time figuring out why so many
    sites are mostly covered with gray in FF. I have to disable
    CSS to see them. In some cases it seems to be a deliberate
    attempt to block people who don't enable script. They
    just plop a full-window DIV with a high z-order on top of
    the page, which script then removes. I've been
    able to cure some problems by blocking display of those
    classes in userContent.css. This particulat site looks like
    it's the usual pile-of-crap overuse of script by people using
    templates and script snippets who don't know what they're
    doing. But the really odd thing is that in IE6 without script
    it actually doesn't look too bad!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to Apd on Sun Nov 21 03:57:26 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 16:17:49, Apd <not@all.invalid> wrote (my
    responses usually follow points raised):
    "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote:
    On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 08:26:48, Mayayana wrote:
    I updated mine according to this webpage:

    <https://msfn.org/board/topic/175170-root-certificates-and-revoked-cer >>>tificates-for-windows-xp/>
    []
    Will that help with a very old Firefox running on W7?

    No. FF has its own cert store.

    I thought I'd read that, so feared as much.

    I get quite a lot of cases where I have to accept the exception (or
    something like that) but then it works; in (I think it is) the last
    week or two, I've had a few that just won't connect, and don't give
    me the option to override the warning.

    Depending on how old your FF is, it may not support the encryption
    algorithm the site wants to use. No amount of updated certs will help
    with that and FF won't be able to override. It might be useful if you
    could note here which URLs are giving trouble and what version of FF
    you're using.

    27.0.1 (which was old even under XP). I'm not worried - I use Chrome (up-to-date, at least fairly; I'm on Windows 7) for anything FF won't
    handle. I just like the UI of this old Firefox, and also on the pages
    that _do_ work with it, I think they work faster, though couldn't prove
    that. Certainly the equally old version of the DownloadHelper extension
    works - and without the slowdown a certain video hosting site has
    recently started imposing, too.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    <This space unintentionally left blank>.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to mayayana@invalid.nospam on Sun Nov 21 13:02:43 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:56:03 -0500, "Mayayana"
    <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    "Steve Hayes" <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote

    | One that none of my browsers will override is
    |
    | http://www.oca.org

    Like Apd, it works fine for me in FF 52.9. Why not
    update? I know they broke a lot of things, but there
    are extensions.

    I was using it, but upgrade to v 41, the bersions before pockets. I
    don't want to have to go away and read a chapter of a book while
    waiting for a web page to load.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mayayana@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Sun Nov 21 08:29:26 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    "Steve Hayes" <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote

    | > Like Apd, it works fine for me in FF 52.9. Why not
    | >update? I know they broke a lot of things, but there
    | >are extensions.
    |
    | I was using it, but upgrade to v 41, the bersions before pockets. I
    | don't want to have to go away and read a chapter of a book while
    | waiting for a web page to load.
    |

    Weird. I never heard of pockets. I had to look it
    up. Maybe that was the icon that looks like a few
    books, on the toolbar? There are some nonsense
    things I always remove, but I never noticed pockets
    before. It turns out I had it "enabled", whatever
    that means. :)

    Firefox is certainly slow and bloated. I like New Moon,
    Pale Moon, or Waterfox better. But once FF is started I
    find pages generally load instantly. However, I also customize.
    I use NoScript to block all script unless I really need it.
    I use a HOSTS file to block spyware and ads from 3rd
    parties. I don't allow videos to load. I block all prefetching...
    So Firefox only needs to load an actual webpage, not 4
    MB of javascript software and 19MB of MP4s. I'm still
    surprised when I see someone else's computer, with things
    jumping all around on webpages. For me, if a webpage
    doesn't sit still then something needs to be fixed. But
    it's an ongoing battle. Fools who love trinkets are forever
    trying to jazz up their pages. I've needed to block CSS display
    of :before, :after, transform and animation, in order to block
    such things as logos dripping fluorescent green and slideshows
    on speed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VanguardLH@21:1/5 to Lawrence Aracabia on Sun Nov 21 16:13:30 2021
    Lawrence Aracabia <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when
    booting but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to
    the Interbnet.

    ...

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the
    Internet?
    (2) ...

    You give no details of what qualifies as no access to the Internet.
    Have you tried connecting your web browsers to your router (whether a
    separate device, or built into a cable modem)? The router has its own
    internal web server to let you configure it. You may find you can
    connect to intranet hosts, like the web browser built into the router,
    but not to Internet hosts.

    Other than web browser, have you tried any other network-capable client
    to see if you can get Internet access? Have you tried opening a command
    shell, and tried either pinging a web site or doing a tracerout to it?

    ping www.intel.com
    tracert www.intel.com

    You don't mention if you tried to connect to both HTTP-only and HTTPS
    web sites, or have only tried to connect to HTTPS web sites. No mention
    of where you tried to connect. What are the FQDN (fully qualified
    domain name), including the protocol (HTTP or HTTPS), to where you have
    tried to connect?

    Is Internet access paid by you, or by your parents, your employer, or
    someone else? If someone else is managing the network setup, could be
    they configured the router with its firewall, or another upstream
    firewall, as to which devices can connect to it. For example, routers
    can often be configured to allow only certain devices by MAC address to
    connect to it. Since the computer is new to your network, could be it
    was not added to the MAC list of devices allowed to connect to the
    router. Can you connect from your host via web browser to the internal
    web server in the router? Mine only uses HTTP, so I cannot use it to
    ensure HTTPS is working okay from my host. It does let me see if basic networking via HTTP is working, though. If the router is separate of
    your DSL/cable modem, you could bypass the router by disconnecting it
    from the DSL/cable modem, and plugging your computer directly to a LAN
    port on the DSL/cable modem using a wired connection (while also
    bypassing any wifi issues).

    Does your router support both IPv4 and IPv6? Some old ones don't
    support IPv6. The sites you may trying to connect may only support
    IPv6; that is, they have no IPv4 address. We don't know to where you
    tried to connect. Also, routers that support both IPv4 and IPv6 may
    have different security settings for each addressing method.

    Lots of sites are dropping support for old versions of Firefox. The
    latest you can get for Windows XP is Firefox 52ESR. You can alter the
    UA (User Agent) string the web client sends to the server, but that
    won't magically change the web browser to support later features
    demanded by many web sites. The old version of Firefox is also not
    maintained. You might look into using MyPal. While it was forked off
    of Pale Moon which was forked off an old version (pre-52ESR aka
    pre-Quantum) of Firefox, it is maintained.

    Do you use an anti-virus or other anti-malware program? If so, many
    will intercept your web traffic to interrogate its content for malicious content. With HTTP, it simply operates as a transparent proxy.
    However, for HTTPS, a proxy cannot decrypt the encrypted traffic to look
    at its content. To do that, AVs use the MITM (Man-In-The-Middle)
    hacking trick. The install a root certificate into the global OS
    certificate store (in Windows, run certmgr.msc), but they have to also
    insert their certificate into Firefox's private certificate store (in Firefox's, go to about:preferences#privacy -> View Certificates). I've
    not found Mozilla explain why they want to wrest cert control away from
    the OS to provide their own private cert store. If the AV's cert
    doesn't install in Firefox, there is no cert to use with the MITM scheme
    where the web browser uses HTTPS to connect to the AV's proxy using the installed AV's certificate (to do the encryption from proxy to web
    client) and to do HTTPS to the server (encryption from proxy to server).
    The proxy does HTTPS at both endpoints (web client and server), but
    internally the HTTPS traffic gets decrypted, so the AV can inspect the
    web traffic.

    If the AV's cert doesn't get installed into Firefox, the AV's proxy
    cannot do HTTPS using MITM to both the web client and to the server. If
    their certificate expires (one of the reasons you need to keep the AV
    updated), it cannot be used by the AV's proxy. In either case, the AV
    proxy will allow HTTP connects (because no cert is needed for MITM), but
    cannot do HTTPS (cert is missing or expired or invalid). You'll find
    other web browsers can connect to HTTPS sites, because they use the OS
    global cert store (that the AV added when it was installed or updated).
    Firefox fails on HTTPS sites when the AV's cert is missing, expired, or
    invalid for the copy installed into Firefox's private cert store.

    The AV /should/ provide a means to reinstall their cert into Firefox's
    private cert store. Alas, not all do, so the only way to fix the
    problem is uninstall and reinstall the AV.

    I use a stream capture program that uses the MITM scheme, and it
    installs their cert into both the OS global cert store (to use with
    non-Mozilla web browsers) and their cert into Firefox's private cert
    store. When Firefox can no longer connect to HTTPS sites, the software
    has an option to reinstall their cert into Firefox's private cert store,
    and HTTPS connections work again. One time was due to a change in how
    certs can be specified for multiple domains, so the old cert became
    invalid, and I had to get a new one. Another time their cert had
    expired, so I had to get a new one. Without their cert (in the OS
    global cert store for non-Mozilla web browsers, or in Firefox's internal
    cert store), the encrypted web traffic cannot be interrogated by the
    local proxy doing the capture. I could capture videos from HTTP sites,
    but there none that I know of with video content that are HTTP, so most
    video content is from HTTPS sites, and where MITM is required to capture
    the videos (or to find from that content where are the video sources to
    capture from there).

    AV's and video stream capture software aren't the only programs that use
    the MITM scheme to interrogate HTTPS traffic. However, if their cert is
    lost, never installed, expires, or becomes invalid, you can no longer
    connect to HTTPS sites. In fact, your web client can't even connect via
    HTTPS to their local transparent proxy.

    You hint at trying multiple web browsers, but don't mention which.
    Since Firefox uses its own private (internal) cert store, so do the
    variants of Firefox. Which *non-Mozilla* web browsers have you tried? Non-Mozilla web browsers (e.g., Internet Explorer, Chrome) use the OS
    global cert store.

    Without details, responses will be as unfocused as your post is vague.

    I did not address the wifi issues since that is a separate topic, and
    should be discussed in a separate thread. Besides, the details
    regarding your phone and wifi setup are just as vague. I don't know
    what you consider a typical wifi hotspot. Many require login to use
    them, some are private, and some may require later wifi protocols than
    your hardware supports.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul@21:1/5 to VanguardLH on Sun Nov 21 19:23:15 2021
    On 11/21/2021 5:13 PM, VanguardLH wrote:
    Lawrence Aracabia <LawrenceAracabia@Aracabia.com> wrote:

    Someone gave me a Windows XP 5.1.2600 laptop that works fine when
    booting but I can't yet find a browser for it that will connect to
    the Interbnet.

    ...

    My two main questions are really a result of the first problem.
    (1) How can I get a web browser for that WinXP that works on the
    Internet?
    (2) ...

    You give no details of what qualifies as no access to the Internet.

    This corresponds to the mass dropout of https-only sites,
    after the recent LetsEncrypt incident. Users view what
    they are seeing as "no access to Internet". Which is a fair
    description, when suddenly nothing works and you don't know why.

    This is not a "ping" style issue, it's a certificate issue
    for https usage. And the "HTTPS Everywhere" campaign has
    caused a large outage for WinXP users, who are badly in
    need of a browser that runs on WinXP and has an up-to-date
    certificate store.

    There are two levels of issues. Manual repair of a certificate
    store, following the instructions on the LetsEncrypt site.

    But HTTPS is more than certificates, it's also crypto
    algorithms, such as CHACHA20. You can fail to connect
    to some sites, because of their fairly picky choice of
    crypto. I ran into one site, with TLS 1.3 and only two
    crypto choices. A "highest class possible" site,
    prepared by some paranoid person. The content on the site,
    did not need this, it was a kind of showing off I would guess.

    # Analyze a web site, for characteristics. Takes five minutes or less.
    # Be patient. Attach the IP as the end argument, as shown.

    https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.some.com

    # Display the characteristics of the browser, whether you left
    # SSL switched on when it should be off. Only TLS should be used.
    # This URL never needs to be edited, just plop and use.

    https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewMyClient.html

    It you have a traditional failure, it shows in the tray,
    as a different icon.

    Paul

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to mayayana@invalid.nospam on Mon Nov 22 07:19:01 2021
    XPost: alt.windows7.general

    On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:29:26 -0500, "Mayayana"
    <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:

    "Steve Hayes" <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote

    | > Like Apd, it works fine for me in FF 52.9. Why not
    | >update? I know they broke a lot of things, but there
    | >are extensions.
    |
    | I was using it, but upgrade to v 41, the bersions before pockets. I
    | don't want to have to go away and read a chapter of a book while
    | waiting for a web page to load.
    |

    Weird. I never heard of pockets. I had to look it
    up. Maybe that was the icon that looks like a few
    books, on the toolbar? There are some nonsense
    things I always remove, but I never noticed pockets
    before. It turns out I had it "enabled", whatever
    that means. :)

    Firefox is certainly slow and bloated. I like New Moon,
    Pale Moon, or Waterfox better. But once FF is started I
    find pages generally load instantly. However, I also customize.
    I use NoScript to block all script unless I really need it.

    Yes, NoScript is the main reason that I still have a version of
    Firefox on my computer, and perfer to use it for visiting sites
    previously unknown to me, until I know that they can be trusted. I
    often make use of the "temporarily allow" feature.

    Another thing I like about Firefox with NoScript is that it has the
    "Allow cookes for session only" thing, which seems to avoid the "We
    value your privacy" messwages.

    I use a HOSTS file to block spyware and ads from 3rd
    parties. I don't allow videos to load. I block all prefetching...
    So Firefox only needs to load an actual webpage, not 4
    MB of javascript software and 19MB of MP4s. I'm still
    surprised when I see someone else's computer, with things
    jumping all around on webpages. For me, if a webpage
    doesn't sit still then something needs to be fixed.

    Agreed.


    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Dulak@21:1/5 to Paul on Mon Nov 22 12:36:56 2021
    On 11/21/2021 7:23 PM, Paul wrote:
    the "HTTPS Everywhere" campaign TLS should be used.

    Paul:

    I knmow what you mean about HTTPS everywhere.

    A local radio station offers a streaming service as well as an FM signal. They recently changed their streaming link to an HTTPS link. I was using an old 486 pc as a music server running Windows 98se and Winamp 5.35 wired into my amp and end table speakers. The new link;

    https://pubmusic.streamguys1.com/wzum-aac

    Would not work on Windows 98se but would work on XP. I edited the link to;

    http://pubmusic.streamguys1.com/wzum-aac

    And 98se worked just fine.

    All of which made me wonder just what the point was of using an encrypted link for something they are giving away for free and even broadcasting!!

    Beam me up Scotty! There is not enough intelligent life down here to bother with.

    John


    --
    \\\||/// ------------------o000----(o)(o)----000o---------------- ----------------------------()--------------------------
    '' Madness takes its toll - Please have exact change. ''

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)