Hi all,
I know this is a little off topic (although it might not be because
I'm sure there's a solution involving Samba!)... but I hope one of
you fine people can advise me on the best approach to achieving an
integrated directory supporting Unix/Linux as a first class citizen,
storing autofs maps, as well as uid, gid and home folders for each
user... and how would that be managed.
I see Microsoft is removing the Unix services extensions with Server
2016, so I'm really wondering what the best, and most long term
sustainable way to integrate a directory so that both platforms
operate as intended, and those users are manageable.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:04:30 +0000
"A. James Lewis via samba" <samba@lists.samba.org> wrote:
Hi all,
I know this is a little off topic (although it might not be because
I'm sure there's a solution involving Samba!)... but I hope one of
you fine people can advise me on the best approach to achieving an integrated directory supporting Unix/Linux as a first class citizen, storing autofs maps, as well as uid, gid and home folders for each
user... and how would that be managed.
I see Microsoft is removing the Unix services extensions with Server
2016, so I'm really wondering what the best, and most long term
sustainable way to integrate a directory so that both platforms
operate as intended, and those users are manageable.
From my understanding, they only removed the idmu server etc, they
haven't removed the RFC2307 attributes. Even if they did, Samba would
still have them.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:04:30 +0000
"A. James Lewis via samba" <samba@lists.samba.org> wrote:
Hi all,From my understanding, they only removed the idmu server etc, they
I know this is a little off topic (although it might not be because
I'm sure there's a solution involving Samba!)... but I hope one of
you fine people can advise me on the best approach to achieving an
integrated directory supporting Unix/Linux as a first class citizen,
storing autofs maps, as well as uid, gid and home folders for each
user... and how would that be managed.
I see Microsoft is removing the Unix services extensions with Server
2016, so I'm really wondering what the best, and most long term
sustainable way to integrate a directory so that both platforms
operate as intended, and those users are manageable.
haven't removed the RFC2307 attributes. Even if they did, Samba would
still have them.
You can use samba-tool to manage the creation of RFC2307 users and
groups.
Rowland
Is there a good guide for how to set up a Samba based AD domain
controller with RFC2307 attributes so I can experiment... I can't get
the Windows guys in my company to do anything Microsoft don't provide
a check box for, unless I can teach them how to do it... but I've not
used any of these Windows technologies for a very long time...
At least if I can show a working system then someone from the Windows
team might consider looking at it.... and if I tell them to do
something that ultimately doesn't work, we'll be back to square one
but they will be doubly reluctant, so I need to learn more about AD
than them... sigh.
OK, I stand corrected... I was sure the last time I looked there it
assumed you have a Windows machine to administer the environment....
which I don't, but it seems that this assumption is no longer the
case.
Is this the most sensible approach?... I've heard talk of directory
tools that maintain a meta level directory and present it as either
AD or whatever you need for another environment...
One thing I'm not sure about, is if the RFC2307 schema in AD includes automounter information, for autofs?...
Hi all,
I know this is a little off topic (although it might not be because
I'm sure there's a solution involving Samba!)... but I hope one of
you fine people can advise me on the best approach to achieving an
integrated directory supporting Unix/Linux as a first class citizen,
storing autofs maps, as well as uid, gid and home folders for each
user... and how would that be managed.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 14:20:57 +0000
"A. James Lewis" <james@fsck.co.uk> wrote:
OK, I stand corrected... I was sure the last time I looked there itNot as standard, but the wiki has a page for it:
assumed you have a Windows machine to administer the environment....
which I don't, but it seems that this assumption is no longer the
case.
Is this the most sensible approach?... I've heard talk of directory
tools that maintain a meta level directory and present it as either
AD or whatever you need for another environment...
One thing I'm not sure about, is if the RFC2307 schema in AD includes
automounter information, for autofs?...
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_schema_extensions
Rowland
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 235:45:49 |
Calls: | 6,624 |
Files: | 12,172 |
Messages: | 5,319,769 |