I can't speak to what the best practice is, but I have some shares that are set up like that from before I started working there. No major issues as
long as samba was not setting the permissions differently
On Mar 15, 2017 7:42 AM, "lejeczek via samba" <samba@lists.samba.org> wrote:
hi everyone
something like this:
[big]
path = /data/big
writeable = no
[my.big]
path = /data/big/my
writeable = yes
[your.big]
path = /data/big/your
writeable = yes
is such a configuration healthy? What are possible negative implications
this may cause, if any?
ver. 4.4
many thanks,
L
something like this:
[big]
path = /data/big
writeable = no
[my.big]
path = /data/big/my
writeable = yes
[your.big]
path = /data/big/your
writeable = yes
is such a configuration healthy? What are possible negative implications
this may cause, if any?
Hi,
Am 15.03.2017 um 15:39 schrieb lejeczek via samba:
something like this:
[big]
path = /data/big
writeable = no
[my.big]
path = /data/big/my
writeable = yes
[your.big]
path = /data/big/your
writeable = yes
is such a configuration healthy? What are possible
negative implications
this may cause, if any?
There is no limitation. It works as expected.
Regards,
Marc
On 16/03/17 16:38, Marc Muehlfeld via samba wrote:
Hi,
Am 15.03.2017 um 15:39 schrieb lejeczek via samba:
something like this:
[big]
path = /data/big
writeable = no
[my.big]
path = /data/big/my
writeable = yes
[your.big]
path = /data/big/your
writeable = yes
is such a configuration healthy? What are possible negative
implications
this may cause, if any?
There is no limitation. It works as expected.
Regards,
Marc
thank chaps,
but what if one changes:
[big]
path = /data/big
writeable = yes
and multiple shares would have users writing, would Samba take of
all this, locking racing or whatever devel calls it.
Still ok?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 285 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 66:20:45 |
Calls: | 6,488 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,096 |
Messages: | 5,275,054 |