• [PATCH RFC V4 1/6] perf tools: lock to protect namespaces and comm

    From Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 2 22:50:03 2017
    Em Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 07:47:52AM -0700, kan.liang@intel.com escreveu:
    From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>

    Add two locks to protect namespaces_list and comm_list.

    The lock is only needed for multithreaded code, so using mutex wrappers provided by perf tool.

    Not all the comm_list/namespaces_list accessing are protected, e.g. thread__exec_comm. Because the multithread code for perf top event synthesizing does not touch them. They don't need a lock.

    They don't need a lock _now_, ok I think we can proceed that way, this
    cset should serve as a warning to people working in further
    multithreading perf.

    - Arnaldo

    Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
    ---
    tools/perf/util/thread.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
    tools/perf/util/thread.h | 3 +++
    2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

    diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.c b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
    index c09bdb5..bf73117 100644
    --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.c
    +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.c
    @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ struct thread *thread__new(pid_t pid, pid_t tid)
    thread->cpu = -1;
    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->namespaces_list);
    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&thread->comm_list);
    + init_rwsem(&thread->namespaces_lock);
    + init_rwsem(&thread->comm_lock);

    comm_str = malloc(32);
    if (!comm_str)
    @@ -83,18 +85,26 @@ void thread__delete(struct thread *thread)
    map_groups__put(thread->mg);
    thread->mg = NULL;
    }
    + down_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
    list_for_each_entry_safe(namespaces, tmp_namespaces,
    &thread->namespaces_list, list) {
    list_del(&namespaces->list);
    namespaces__free(namespaces);
    }
    + up_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
    +
    + down_write(&thread->comm_lock);
    list_for_each_entry_safe(comm, tmp_comm, &thread->comm_list, list) {
    list_del(&comm->list);
    comm__free(comm);
    }
    + up_write(&thread->comm_lock);
    +
    unwind__finish_access(thread);
    nsinfo__zput(thread->nsinfo);

    + exit_rwsem(&thread->namespaces_lock);
    + exit_rwsem(&thread->comm_lock);
    free(thread);
    }

    @@ -125,8 +135,8 @@ struct namespaces *thread__namespaces(const struct thread *thread)
    return list_first_entry(&thread->namespaces_list, struct namespaces, list);
    }

    -int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
    - struct namespaces_event *event)
    +static int __thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
    + struct namespaces_event *event)
    {
    struct namespaces *new, *curr = thread__namespaces(thread);

    @@ -149,6 +159,17 @@ int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
    return 0;
    }

    +int thread__set_namespaces(struct thread *thread, u64 timestamp,
    + struct namespaces_event *event)
    +{
    + int ret;
    +
    + down_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
    + ret = __thread__set_namespaces(thread, timestamp, event);
    + up_write(&thread->namespaces_lock);
    + return ret;
    +}
    +
    struct comm *thread__comm(const struct thread *thread)
    {
    if (list_empty(&thread->comm_list))
    @@ -170,8 +191,8 @@ struct comm *thread__exec_comm(const struct thread *thread)
    return last;
    }

    -int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
    - bool exec)
    +static int ____thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str,
    + u64 timestamp, bool exec)
    {
    struct comm *new, *curr = thread__comm(thread);

    @@ -195,6 +216,17 @@ int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
    return 0;
    }

    +int __thread__set_comm(struct thread *thread, const char *str, u64 timestamp,
    + bool exec)
    +{
    + int ret;
    +
    + down_write(&thread->comm_lock);
    + ret = ____thread__set_comm(thread, str, timestamp, exec);
    + up_write(&thread->comm_lock);
    + return ret;
    +}
    +
    int thread__set_comm_from_proc(struct thread *thread)
    {
    char path[64];
    @@ -212,7 +244,7 @@ int thread__set_comm_from_proc(struct thread *thread)
    return err;
    }

    -const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
    +static const char *__thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
    {
    const struct comm *comm = thread__comm(thread);

    @@ -222,6 +254,17 @@ const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
    return comm__str(comm);
    }

    +const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread *thread)
    +{
    + const char *str;
    +
    + down_read((struct rw_semaphore *)&thread->comm_lock);
    + str = __thread__comm_str(thread);
    + up_read((struct rw_semaphore *)&thread->comm_lock);
    +
    + return str;
    +}
    +
    /* CHECKME: it should probably better return the max comm len from its comm list */
    int thread__comm_len(struct thread *thread)
    {
    diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread.h b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
    index cb1a5dd..10555d6 100644
    --- a/tools/perf/util/thread.h
    +++ b/tools/perf/util/thread.h
    @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
    #include "symbol.h"
    #include <strlist.h>
    #include <intlist.h>
    +#include "rwsem.h"

    struct thread_stack;
    struct unwind_libunwind_ops;
    @@ -29,7 +30,9 @@ struct thread {
    int comm_len;
    bool dead; /* if set thread has exited */
    struct list_head namespaces_list;
    + struct rw_semaphore namespaces_lock;
    struct list_head comm_list;
    + struct rw_semaphore comm_lock;
    u64 db_id;

    void *priv;
    --
    2.5.5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)