This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
On 9/6/21 6:26 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 9/6/21 3:48 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 4/3/21 10:03 PM, n952162 wrote:
I find no clue why the binary packages on my server aren't being picked
up. The --debug option (and --verbose, naturally) has no additional
information. Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately, saying 0
packages are selected.
I found one problem: on my server, my apache log file had a 302 fetch
error for /var/cache/binpkgs/Packages. I touched it a few hours into
the future and started getting a 200 for it. But still no emerge would >>> fetch a binary (even though there ARE good candidates). On a guess, I
touched all the files in binpkgs an hour into the future, but that
didn't help.
Binary updates are VERY useful for virtual machines.
Unfortunately, there hasn't really been a resolution on this issue.
I think it's reasonable that if portage accesses a package on a binary
server and decides it's not eligible, it should report the reason for
rejecting it.
Is it possible to make requests for improvements in gentoo?
In the current case, llvm-common came across as binary, thunderbird
and firefox are also listed as a *binary* update, but llvm is an
*ebuild*. Neither host (binary server) nor the client (updating
system) have any USE flags defined for llvm. I know of no way to
figure out what went wrong.
Okay, maybe I've found what I was looking for:
!!! The following binary packages have been ignored due to changed
dependencies:
net-misc/iputils-20210202::gentoo
sys-devel/llvm-12.0.1::gentoo
sys-devel/llvm-10.0.1::gentoo
sys-devel/llvm-10.0.1::gentoo
sys-devel/clang-12.0.1::gentoo
sys-devel/lld-12.0.1::gentoo
sys-libs/compiler-rt-12.0.1::gentoo
sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-12.0.1::gentoo
sys-libs/libomp-12.0.1::gentoo
NOTE: The --binpkg-changed-deps=n option will prevent emerge
from ignoring these binary packages if possible.
Using --binpkg-changed-deps=y will silence this warning.
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/6/21 6:26 PM, n952162 wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:
df6d74b7-241c-775d-2124-cef13808f79c@web.de">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/6/21 3:48 PM, n952162 wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:
56a7028f-4047-2d67-eb5a-2e9f14aac573@web.de">On 4/3/21
10:03 PM, n952162 wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">I find no clue why the binary packages
on my server aren't being picked <br>
up. The --debug option (and --verbose, naturally) has no
additional <br>
information. Running the --getbinpkgonly stops immediately,
saying 0 <br>
packages are selected. <br>
<br>
I found one problem: on my server, my apache log file had a
302 fetch <br>
error for /var/cache/binpkgs/Packages. I touched it a few
hours into <br>
the future and started getting a 200 for it. But still no
emerge would <br>
fetch a binary (even though there ARE good candidates). On a
guess, I <br>
touched all the files in binpkgs an hour into the future, but
that <br>
didn't help. <br>
<br>
Binary updates are VERY useful for virtual machines. <br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Unfortunately, there hasn't really been a resolution on this
issue. <br>
<br>
I think it's reasonable that if portage accesses a package on a
binary <br>
server and decides it's not eligible, it should report the
reason for <br>
rejecting it. <br>
<br>
Is it possible to make requests for improvements in gentoo? <br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>In the current case, llvm-common came across as binary,
thunderbird and firefox are also listed as a <b>binary</b>
update, but llvm is an <b>ebuild</b>. Neither host (binary
server) nor the client (updating system) have any USE flags
defined for llvm. I know of no way to figure out what went
wrong.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Okay, maybe I've found what I was looking for:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><font face="monospace">!!! The following binary packages have
been ignored due to changed dependencies:</font><br>
<br>
<font face="monospace"> net-misc/iputils-20210202::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-devel/llvm-12.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-devel/llvm-10.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-devel/llvm-10.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-devel/clang-12.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-devel/lld-12.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-libs/compiler-rt-12.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace">
sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-12.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> sys-libs/libomp-12.0.1::gentoo</font><br>
<br>
<font face="monospace">NOTE: The --binpkg-changed-deps=n option
will prevent emerge</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> from ignoring these binary packages
if possible.</font><br>
<font face="monospace"> Using --binpkg-changed-deps=y will
silence this warning.</font><br>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)