Do any of the kernels post 5.15.0 boot? I tried 5.15.2 and imediately
wrote off the 5.15 branch because it didn't even boot.
I came back to 5.16.5, same symptom, says "loading linux 5.16.5" and
then hangs, no further kernel output.
5.14.20 works great with same config, no known issues.
Now it's possible that something fantasmagorically stupid is going on
here, as is usual, but for the love of god WHY, just WHY?!?!??!
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:02:46 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:
Do any of the kernels post 5.15.0 boot? I tried 5.15.2 and imediately
wrote off the 5.15 branch because it didn't even boot.
I came back to 5.16.5, same symptom, says "loading linux 5.16.5" and
then hangs, no further kernel output.
5.14.20 works great with same config, no known issues.
Now it's possible that something fantasmagorically stupid is going on
here, as is usual, but for the love of god WHY, just WHY?!?!??!
I have the same with one machine, see the thread "Kernel 5.15.11 won't
boot". Nothing there helped me, and I haven't had time to investigate further, but there may be something for you.
I recall reading some foobar with "simple framebuffer" cropping up and
also I
found this bug in case it helps with either of your machines:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/821406
Do any of the kernels post 5.15.0 boot? I tried 5.15.2 and imediately
wrote off the 5.15 branch because it didn't even boot.
I came back to 5.16.5, same symptom, says "loading linux 5.16.5" and
then hangs, no further kernel output.
5.14.20 works great with same config, no known issues.
Now it's possible that something fantasmagorically stupid is going on
here, as is usual, but for the love of god WHY, just WHY?!?!??!
Alan Grimes <alonzotg@verizon.net> writes:
Do any of the kernels post 5.15.0 boot? I tried 5.15.2 and imediatelySee the thread on the LKML at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d8981e2a-4f61-72bb-e5cc-bf4ded29c08a@synopsys.com/
wrote off the 5.15 branch because it didn't even boot.
I came back to 5.16.5, same symptom, says "loading linux 5.16.5" and
then hangs, no further kernel output.
5.14.20 works great with same config, no known issues.
Now it's possible that something fantasmagorically stupid is going on
here, as is usual, but for the love of god WHY, just WHY?!?!??!
Try setting "CONFIG_FB=y"
I had problems building nvidia-drivers, turning on
"CONFIG_DRM_CIRRUS_QEMU"
worked around the problem
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/871r3cr08w.fsf@wylie.me.uk/
On Thursday, 3 February 2022 08:04:07 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:02:46 -0500, Alan Grimes wrote:I recall reading some foobar with "simple framebuffer" cropping up and also I found this bug in case it helps with either of your machines:
Do any of the kernels post 5.15.0 boot? I tried 5.15.2 and imediatelyI have the same with one machine, see the thread "Kernel 5.15.11 won't
wrote off the 5.15 branch because it didn't even boot.
I came back to 5.16.5, same symptom, says "loading linux 5.16.5" and
then hangs, no further kernel output.
5.14.20 works great with same config, no known issues.
Now it's possible that something fantasmagorically stupid is going on
here, as is usual, but for the love of god WHY, just WHY?!?!??!
boot". Nothing there helped me, and I haven't had time to investigate
further, but there may be something for you.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/821406
Also, be careful - if you just search the config for "SIMPLE" it finds
two FB related entries - you need one of them and not the other, but I
am sitting at the wrong computer to check which.
I have the same with one machine, see the thread "Kernel 5.15.11 won't boot". Nothing there helped me, and I haven't had time to investigate further, but there may be something for you.
I recall reading some foobar with "simple framebuffer" cropping up and
also I found this bug in case it helps with either of your machines:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/821406
On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:17:06 +0000, Michael wrote:
I have the same with one machine, see the thread "Kernel 5.15.11
won't boot". Nothing there helped me, and I haven't had time to investigate further, but there may be something for you.
I recall reading some foobar with "simple framebuffer" cropping up and
also I found this bug in case it helps with either of your machines:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/821406
That's it, thanks!
I tried the FB settings but didn't expect it to work as the system
really wasn't booting, as opposed to booting with do display.
Setting CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU=y results in a boot. I had been using CONFIG_MNATIVE_AMD.
The "new" simpleFB is here:
Device Drivers --->
Graphics support --->
[*] Simple framebuffer driver
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 97:18:36 |
Calls: | 6,766 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,295 |
Messages: | 5,376,373 |
Posted today: | 1 |