• Fwd: Re: oomadj - bug

    From Die Optimisten@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 4 09:10:01 2021
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    Hi,
      I'm not sure why that's happening. ps just prints what the kernel
    decides the oomadj is, it doesn't control it.

    the problem:
    On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 22:34, Die Optimisten <inform@die-optimisten.net <mailto:inform@die-optimisten.net>> wrote:

    Hi!
      how can a subprocess get better oom then its origin?
             seen with chromium (also _without_ suid!)

             change oomadj to 15 of _all_ chrome-processes; opening a
    new window => created process has oomadj==0 !

    thank you

    Opti


    <html>
    <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
    </head>
    <body>
    <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-unicode">
    <div dir="ltr">Hi,
    <div>  I'm not sure why that's happening. ps just prints what
    the kernel decides the oomadj is, it doesn't control it.</div>
    </div>
    <br>
    <div class="gmail_quote">
    <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">=&gt; the problem:<br>
    </div>
    <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 22:34,
    Die Optimisten &lt;<a href="mailto:inform@die-optimisten.net">inform@die-optimisten.net</a>&gt;
    wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
    0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi!<br>
      how can a subprocess get better oom then its origin?<br>
             seen with chromium (also _without_ suid!)<br>
    <br>
             change oomadj to 15 of _all_ chrome-processes;
    opening a new window =&gt; created process has oomadj==0 !<br>
    <br>
    thank you<br>
    <br>
    Opti<br>
    <br>
    </blockquote>
    </div>
    </div>
    </body>
    </html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)