1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.KERNEL

  • iproute2 team maintainership

    From Luca Boccassi@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 1 23:10:01 2022
    Hello Kernel Team,

    I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And to
    be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything in particular.

    But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in general, I
    think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella, given
    it's prio: important.

    What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team area
    and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
    it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
    very closely related.

    (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

    Thoughts?

    --
    Kind regards,
    Luca Boccassi

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCSqx93EIPGOymuRKGv37813JB4FAmJHaQgACgkQKGv37813 JB6JFw//ZQT/lxXtINbCvcQ0E1ldyZ2l2wTuoihOVmHQ5Hn08/BT28+C4fR60Jws 9KQJmUSE1wOe22GMjPlowYAIe58GQj/7TkH5eO9Jn5wikM7fGR1UzlVKtvGGkf3v qZzx//i8lPk/lJRYeKDuFzigznHNNfPLNFeaIEvxFT8CKHl4zwACsYDwEw6o+yCf /jaVWCaYKgEakp2Gj/J/Ael5GBS7wA2/E985/9MjHwOILLiO3+oALRAJQUPB1tiX VuOlezjWxYjvDrorrqiJxqSTFF+ETwRhWMXqxYubh7+iOmR6A8qo7bVaU1jMuEHx QxgChpKKzxPMRUHAh6zIRR+jhFi1jn0gDfQHiFQyqJjYBjVJinRq0nZi65zCAFaU UaczDlRW0L+F49dIml1Jpy2HpTwK7TXPaLTb4imCKEdfqYRCxyrahp1Nz59Y0w2d JgVKo7IYuQoEMa4tJgazADROcNjurmEpiFIQnz+beN5e72Pc9iZbpl+uLbXMMmWu 6TVEzCDsbOEZtzPZIOhTxHGE4q8NR8ZmUvkUJxscw+3v52col+sEy4aPUQXndUPL QwUjtf8oGxnuycfEV1cDu4n23nV+7OV0kqBiIYpxH62QHQg6jpcsfgRGb+ht7U1i HVDN97YqRB2zufZ3dIXfolqj9PkDwKeaM3Qlyrenw9iAbFuZ09k=
    =uTnC
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Hutchings@21:1/5 to Luca Boccassi on Sun Apr 10 20:40:01 2022
    On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    Hello Kernel Team,

    I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And to
    be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything in particular.

    But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in general, I
    think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella, given
    it's prio: important.

    What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team area
    and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
    it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
    very closely related.

    (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

    Thoughts?

    Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmJTIpYACgkQ57/I7JWG EQn89g//TD3bv3xXQ7eS6Zyi7nhY3yHqASTIj8nVO0A4rPVLRNGzByzellqZaP8V vOCjZSnBPkJ1btB+1sZxddqJB4goCzoztNf+EE1VxYCGOmyVzjsGC21ajMMjaKtK 6MRc/uVDVk9hr3wkrtwCMmFJexexTgqRBaqisYcKb4GCcIfoJF7hiGkwfaIcVTAy HrdgFs+2XdJ+u6u1qOuuJvF5eBDpoudV1Offe5K4E/bmP0kXVegg9ukQPQaW47Ce HQq4c+DuCcdZPxhbXc7hGF2RttQAZek56uaY9V5HyJ9BkXZUmMAi2pruo+2u/6G3 YRY82Ri4AFY0wITSqkP+OFOr3x1vAJrQW5O2miqUe7pa0VQl27VwmKOIeXBQ1XC5 R8V4X9cozCEUjKRfAfAs22fHrK0X34QJ1EnOommZOSrtbGQPSHmzfiSXUpU7Z5ql DaJcOpSh6KMAbmMLo/I76EiErtGJr/Kr8z/YN6cVa2+qWjBQwJvjz1A4OKOwNc7U gVZoZQMyqGZHeZ9ZiRMQnc4z5QRQZdgbQ8KdCGiJfwgf6/Vuc+CFM45Aqs1auG0T 4VIpg87ASTXZ/j4nhbSqHxvnT8o7OYakgqkK/xj7P673ttXMaiEKWCW+9fOSaDEH 608gRkzD0CMYz/UzYpHo5qt+4OY0zTxfpuqBVD/jAvcQpNJ0tXE=
    =/Leq
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luca Boccassi@21:1/5 to Ben Hutchings on Sun Apr 10 22:50:01 2022
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    Hello Kernel Team,

    I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And
    to
    be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything
    in
    particular.

    But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
    general, I
    think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
    given
    it's prio: important.

    What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team
    area
    and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
    it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
    very closely related.

    (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

    Thoughts?

    Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

    Thank you!

    I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:

    https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295

    Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?

    As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
    switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.

    --
    Kind regards,
    Luca Boccassi

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCSqx93EIPGOymuRKGv37813JB4FAmJTQpsACgkQKGv37813 JB5PIQ//TPbNcX/6icrrqrooWs7YoOm2hIF/ODOQZ9vB9q0WvjgwcmpWrvS3i8uj SOaYl2Koj5a/gZfSCy3hhWwQB1z1+CJ8IcBgcS8EDuRCo2Z3Uv5/31daqP8R3KJX Ee33aiXEa0+Sb7ISH2/53iHb/XKfoq2b/yQFGQbZaxHg8YkAhNb/QsHKdKxmP0tQ d7FBLWYiS2tvfnaDeypFcgLORDV4EQNoZtN7VahNkVWwpWtOlc877cfl8SninOuM A/Gn+v31D6so5ufCJQPLbOqJEsFJiMSl+nZ+peRSqEbXtGH03fH+sy2y/fqy8gVr KcArycNiUU0LBull73FHwTRuRZD8YimM/WbYPa6svDyTfZ8jRnGF1MbD43QTGBMd 57L50Cyp05Y3wczquK/vYBdNq/dh9ZXYYlj4oKhvg0CMrM+O5CCD3mYOXIA/TgV+ 2Adpa03jRt3O7bBDXXW8N3PZDxowncGak5UrX6I7jJcbZcPjfJMkdGV6mpyF7dwB MCXxvYNygyzBFh4wTc3sy196ctgH3RPC6NZNvgO+f9sgJIhgEs4PZw56CPIZPnUJ mgUAmyj3WCnr5xWNqwuwt6fPA9wg2Fb7OqNgvCBYupK3YxilbjVkdU8hU5ITDsPg Z/tyy0GCrgrMDmwWHi6S2YKSbP+1KMuCqmwZOpa03YRqRPw91zo=
    =0PTY
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Hutchings@21:1/5 to Luca Boccassi on Mon Apr 11 00:00:01 2022
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 21:48 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    Hello Kernel Team,

    I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now. And
    to
    be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with anything
    in
    particular.

    But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
    general, I
    think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
    given
    it's prio: important.

    What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel team
    area
    and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After all,
    it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and it's
    very closely related.

    (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

    Thoughts?

    Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

    Thank you!

    I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:

    https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295

    Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?

    As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
    switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.

    OK, I've invited you to the group.

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmJTUu4ACgkQ57/I7JWG EQmCnRAAtubg5iuGR2ymcMZ4dZ1IMkhEG67KVcvRhYz7PZwwc4BJm9SuSFkUQk0O 3qu4BBNLD+aE+lc+rm/6ZpK7GNZw/kP5CZ5U4hmBMpxqVhJImrTPvkf8haEpCy4o IX6QplwhOfCXwx2CQ6suWC31PEiMCp1KmJiOVrHu9X0gPVecY2QHcTwUcUqAOtfj tiOy6c+CyhZYxBCUmafRCoXgGa3B2/54f6MQov6LaGS+Uj5VDFgbbrTRb1nLyOEK YCo/V5+hrg8f1jxlza4Ev44mJks9bOUTY7uxhjyq+8jxNHBD5sP1hv2D4MRZPOuj 4rQuqP/Il0eX8qoO+Xkr270qpLCjO3wSGSyvgQLOHc2j9LPfPuAshhytbYMN6ihS /CEfwacm3NpO+A09iXAgmyGeczA6YA3tQ1dyXXyxO2Xf/glfI1pWScFDDiwWMQT9 LD2AgNCzIYEco5cRLaAvlZHOgTaU0FZlaXtYljMBTN2ZR6UxPrpTTLeVUjHDxnw3 NK+owZhcBhh5ZriFUrb6NkAmrUOndMBjDw3RsW4FdWO9sbB6W4MjmJfyToKios+F bp8aRoFV30QpapUuqT6SH9P0QEXTqQhuAR3Xat+J+7LUzndFaGti8Sdvj34KifWF 99yAqhV2JAy8JRM9zQQLlqgIT4yS92tKbxnYadXNPbd8a7HB+Pw=
    =ddEa
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Luca Boccassi@21:1/5 to Ben Hutchings on Mon Apr 11 00:10:02 2022
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 23:58 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 21:48 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    Hello Kernel Team,

    I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now.
    And
    to
    be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with
    anything
    in
    particular.

    But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
    general, I
    think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
    given
    it's prio: important.

    What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel
    team
    area
    and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After
    all,
    it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and
    it's
    very closely related.

    (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

    Thoughts?

    Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

    Thank you!

    I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:

    https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295

    Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?

    As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload
    switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.

    OK, I've invited you to the group.

    Ben.

    Thank you!

    Could you also please add me as a maintainer/admin of the iproute2
    repo? I can't push right now:

    Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 428 bytes | 428.00 KiB/s, done.
    Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
    remote: GitLab: You are not allowed to push code to protected branches on this project.
    To salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git
    ! [remote rejected] debian/sid -> debian/sid (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git'

    --
    Kind regards,
    Luca Boccassi

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCSqx93EIPGOymuRKGv37813JB4FAmJTU3cACgkQKGv37813 JB5yRRAAsODxWmBSljx0WacMxI+SOJebnEs8rAzgtVEc4+DyQ4ud4eyMWnn4Gvw6 rTq7Syecmbvp3salQXD1CcXhKRqwGFwEFOLh8dZW2QfC8dbKk+Uq36UpOUgLcHGu HVMCjnMbS0Jlxe3hTviUGDgF35GtTRkNpctYLUmwA2pLp80C3GUANsyrcvAiyQ+G fLDx7PXUl6u/BDNtTsfisdrC/o5UXQx6WgpGxhBv1fTbyD6V5gNkINoGsti0v3Fn 8tepkhqQfqKTyH9UgOdbr3WLS0ZZzlujxiL+vGvJf9//D3r3FHijW7aURVCHXDXR yRedtCPJBKX20FBHgzZE71p7rwAjUPxiFCizFQnJME48MCtkqcJApx/qOe0CMANi HmT7jL60CWT6Up+iIEPnGpI773wA+OWKMpSSLBx86Ssr9VinjjBhSKbvHc3x4r3L s4gcWrchWkB2fpgU4GXZxih36iK30OpOvcumgo9jmw/YooIV7ALT//aQt3FqV/1r ZBNbAdQQjR6vp5DQ89LnM3Las3HcB1RBqHp6hbyHVdSxzKi4uuewNrZd2gWs8CLE 6qzkJW7CIcJyi3fDSD570dV2NU4dmWhln67KuxCmzubuOLP46Ovlwn41fiOyPdds 8T+c33Ew+Lw6ewFrcbezGxoUCE2akY9ZyUEtmmlAGONp8j3xcrg=
    =spE7
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Hutchings@21:1/5 to Luca Boccassi on Mon Apr 11 00:30:01 2022
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 23:00 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 23:58 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 21:48 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    On Sun, 2022-04-10 at 20:31 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
    On Fri, 2022-04-01 at 22:05 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
    Hello Kernel Team,

    I have been maintaining iproute2 for more than four years now.
    And
    to
    be clear I am happy to continue, and don't need help with
    anything
    in
    particular.

    But thinking about core packages and team maintainership in
    general, I
    think it would be good to have iproute2 under a team umbrella,
    given
    it's prio: important.

    What do you think about moving the Salsa repo to the kernel
    team
    area
    and the the maintainer field to the kernel mailing list? After
    all,
    it's maintained upstream in the kernel infrastructure too, and
    it's
    very closely related.

    (previous maintainers CC'ed as FYI)

    Thoughts?

    Yes, I think this would be a good fit for the kernel team.

    Thank you!

    I've opened a request for the Salsa admins to move the repo:

    https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/295

    Could you please add me to the kernel-team Salsa group?

    As soon as the repository move is sorted, I will do a new upload switching the Maintainer field to Debian Kernel Team.

    OK, I've invited you to the group.

    Ben.

    Thank you!

    Could you also please add me as a maintainer/admin of the iproute2
    repo? I can't push right now:

    Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 428 bytes | 428.00 KiB/s, done.
    Total 4 (delta 3), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
    remote: GitLab: You are not allowed to push code to protected branches on this project.
    To salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git
    ! [remote rejected] debian/sid -> debian/sid (pre-receive hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'salsa.debian.org:kernel-team/iproute2.git'

    Done.

    Ben.

    --
    Ben Hutchings
    Knowledge is power. France is bacon.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmJTWYkACgkQ57/I7JWG EQmOBRAAh9L+CmO6MPt/qDS+YpevvoBeulOnO7tXYX4uziDnkVjOOOox320N722g h/MIJTE5oe3cgbIoTWCn9O5gU4QhGKoB6G+nAoqvoVPmGuquPfXudUMy/KrXGes0 OBDLerSSkeN/BboYtWRelZ98h1Xufp17qBU4FzH+fJM5h228WdX86BFnC6o/N0Qy PHGiADknVGtJaQ1ApQFNAztH3zYKLyYB+zzAl7ItsR7Cd22N3TssKqtjPxD2xloe yefuOt+k+wxbQGVNEBRno4qx3Zyg2vfKQy482PrJS881r6RTInK+Z95Lp9KuEHAD FBIKtyLwxpIXAKob1gFTnx4sktcW3EMEHeoRfN9zENa2hGbMgwucbsxBEUn1po7c ql0V7eohO1YYXvjXPaAIFLuOjzqfTycg5VSXrilk31JfqUIaux/cJnu9tsAE9swK Ph+rIj64wLMQLWpFrYJPaxmxGiizK8XF++78S8oT5q6fFB4jHShgO0kHT3MWOpA2 ai/IkAi70SMgwB2v49RnFxmWmial2itso7p2dNfnYA6zignlrU6KQjY+OfMY5RO4 4TPXp4eIUgUDJ5Uv36ngsJcTXKyGDqhHE44MlbliVMRNR44JvOEMzWljInq6WqzL 7XDLkXiYdVlAQKn2Yp5RGyLQK3HSq0MYG4LpKNTzZY9DWjVzhHE=
    =JZYA
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)