Hi Joey and Nicolas!
Long time ago the Debconf::Gettext [O] module got imported into the dpkg
code base [I] with some modifications from Nicolas. The current module
in the dpkg code base is [C], which has seen substantial modifications
by me since its import.
This is the only BSD-2-clause file in the whole code base, so it would
be nice if it could get relicensed into GPL-2+ like almost all other
code in dpkg, to simplify the licensing. Would both of you be fine
with such relicense?
Thanks,
Guillem
[O] < https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-debconf/debconf/-/blob/master/Debconf/Gettext.pm
[I] < https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/scripts/dpkg-gettext.pl?id=322d4f825722adf3deb85dbf7170ebb29862d5aa
[C] <https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/tree/scripts/Dpkg/Gettext.pm>
Hi Joey and Nicolas!
Long time ago the Debconf::Gettext [O] module got imported into the dpkg
code base [I] with some modifications from Nicolas. The current module
in the dpkg code base is [C], which has seen substantial modifications
by me since its import.
This is the only BSD-2-clause file in the whole code base, so it would
be nice if it could get relicensed into GPL-2+ like almost all other
code in dpkg, to simplify the licensing. Would both of you be fine
with such relicense?
Thanks,
Guillem
[O] <https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-debconf/debconf/-/blob/master/Debconf/Gettext.pm>
[I] <https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/diff/scripts/dpkg-gettext.pl?id=322d4f825722adf3deb85dbf7170ebb29862d5aa>
[C] <https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/tree/scripts/Dpkg/Gettext.pm>
GPL-2+ is fine for any of my modifications.
I'm not sure if there is enough of my code left here, or enough expressiveness, for me to hold a legitimate copyright on it. But I
am fine with relicensing it GPL-2+.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 39:37:09 |
Calls: | 6,708 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,241 |
Messages: | 5,353,642 |