1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL.QA

  • Removed packages handling

    From benattris@gezapig.nl" @21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 1 12:30:02 2021
    I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group.

    Made some maybe handy lists. (not yet all packages)


    gone packages
    https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Gone2021.html
    Debian QA Group https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Debian_QA_Group2021.html


    Nice Day,
    Ben


    https://www.gezapig.nl/Free.html

    <!doctype html>
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    </head>
    <body>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group.
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    Made some maybe handy lists. (not yet all packages)
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    gone packages
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <a href="https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Gone2021.html">https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Gone2021.html</a>
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    Debian QA Group
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <a href="https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Debian_QA_Group2021.html">https://www.gezapig.nl/Software/Special/Debian_QA_Group2021.html</a>
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    Nice Day,
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    Ben
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    https://www.gezapig.nl/Free.html
    <br>
    </div>
    </body>
    </html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrey Rahmatullin@21:1/5 to benattris@gezapig.nl on Mon Feb 1 12:40:01 2021
    On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:57:49AM +0100, benattris@gezapig.nl benattris@gezapig.nl wrote:
    I wonder if removed packages should go to Debian QA Group.
    What do you mean?

    --
    WBR, wRAR

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmAX5kYtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh 45oP/jUmhX9nPghgpq/cjCkwtrPtBHd5G78fUP0bUVhDKdDFMwNA5pfLBir9d/lk TDHXgUryUdo9PYzk5Waj4lPXMJhTevvZMWZsB37IJmIgTfTskD2A2PjY1Y0X83CN 0VVdcQHW61qq+R9BjMuM5vlGjV4sf+2QxcDJcCL7yEfhnBxEPrU+xYcCFyf6P3AX xEfzR+tABsiKqXRDWWuckgD+TFPCTdbB2rFTPldzwqOW6eGHGXl2iSOU/L9IAPWj +MbPZWl7YaxQZKOL5QDcENLTGDCWb16nvFosz+z5C7lpHojR6fwy2fxmR66VONVH LBy4Q+Ee4FO+pKDwk9HMgGVGJqBlYie5ZmY6X81pJ11groIebZNgIUvHDkfHeaEr l4Z59Fym+Rchb3kXZ2gEOfyvxZ7n0zSwo2euGzAaekuqC1Fglyy8BaLEMMM5+UHv kZ/oVCBGZRwh3RgYrCjegKVIBBm/DfahqjKJ/npXdvIaziySivdIkvWlFX7KOcgc T6Rgx3ZL89soU7MzFgPiHd6/xg9FgT1qvfnXk7V1GINY/pGi27r5p0qqUc8kS4yo 176Yc/I1xLlIZeipKtuzujjXcTywOncFRLoWqoZK9FhHhTZyf/L6vQoX8krfchpV ygNnQLR6B98F4FF0vDGCHbmFgqIg0rEJJ2g6yzDcf0BJMA/a
    =Fq8U
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From benattris@gezapig.nl" @21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 1 14:20:01 2021
    These are abandoned packages no one cares for.
    Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group.
    Seems logic to me.

    What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, thes are not realy bound to a maintainer but are still healthy.

    <!doctype html>
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    </head>
    <body>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    These are abandoned packages no one cares for.
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group.
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    Seems logic to me.
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    <br>
    </div>
    <div style="" class="default-style">
    What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, thes are not realy bound to a maintainer but are still healthy.
    <br>
    </div>
    </body>
    </html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrey Rahmatullin@21:1/5 to benattris@gezapig.nl on Mon Feb 1 14:50:01 2021
    On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 01:49:56PM +0100, benattris@gezapig.nl benattris@gezapig.nl wrote:
    These are abandoned packages no one cares for.
    Also all orphaned packages should go to Debian QA Group.
    Seems logic to me.

    What is harder to find are the realy orphaned packages that also exist, thes are not realy bound to a maintainer but are still healthy.
    Still not sure what problem do you see, what are you proposing and how is
    this related to your original email.
    Also please reply to emails using the reply function instead of composing
    new unrelated ones.

    --
    WBR, wRAR

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmAYBvQtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh 9uwQAIYiEiKAdWHvZqHlO4h3jHHxkcrOHKGWDnbXs0tWiqJQPtv5hrI0h8khTacm NGZfXLiNwF7ixvHfpLYql8PR9RbT/3mJPJOpja1PkQjSXuZIMyT5JrbBTtmq3jZy xXIRw22E0LGPrCi3FF8myG/yxN5rX7Trk7hpYK+sBBQ41XZH6IWzYJDY3B2RYEM1 Z4+X0/k3fTWS+u6wcQ2PyfmSlikfbjB9kQpOCM2IzNOkWjuftbtYZNpJAivthUlf x72DI+tM5YfwStp1gTc8ig01t4yK0sbRO3oRkRGoD14chf/I99lABqL7haGoCEGh NXJZvetAt2PT4xZS2cc/9x7ALZs0JrsJ9jQSlX57qh+jrT3EJwQSV3EC4EyV0Ebf iyvlcfuV8mghLYScqwFcaG5ENoNXrzYKPjWFbjVWCIGsXK5gNZ56y/eTR8yyZ5Jx C5ViEWrQkie8X1ckHT8hCfhg/W/kQNbGC9dubIMzmhBqaUxJbUxoyEwFdXAVs0XQ ls+83Go5UJGmJd3lRoyFKm2np4AG1sO0rqmcfdUxKT+pqHlald/LC/eYuFMHXhuL LZ4iexYr3xapuTLdrIIeJrGTyFCOYEj9Iya5DesVzeMgaHjbTRxLGK2oCZOudB0F JVcoQXyvtlLTOGo2Wk38l+L48LOI8jL+4ERBNnnEKbaNpIrb
    =iiHo
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)