• Re: General Resolution: Change the resolution process: First call for v

    From Andreas Beckmann@21:1/5 to Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roe on Mon Jan 17 13:40:02 2022
    Hi,

    not having followed the discussions on debian-vote leading to the
    current GR, but reading the details for the first time in the CFV email,
    I was confused by an "undefined reference":

    On 15/01/2022 00.53, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
    [...]
    Choice 2: Amend resolution process, allow extension of discussion period
    [...]
    Much of the rationale of Russ' proposal still applies, and indeed this
    [...]

    What is "Russ' proposal"?
    My first thought was: Why is this making a reference to something from
    the previous discussion period without explicitly stating it?

    Checking the corresponding website it becomes clear that this seems to
    be a reference to "Proposal A" (in the version of 202x-xx-xx),
    unfortunately the proposers are not listed in the CFV email.

    s/Russ' proposal/Proposal A/ would have made this even clearer on the
    website, but "Proposal A" is also undefined in the CFV email (where is
    is called "Choice 1").


    Andreas

    Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Hartman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 18 01:30:03 2022
    "Andreas" == Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> writes:
    Andreas> What is "Russ' proposal"? My first thought was: Why is
    Andreas> this making a reference to something from the previous
    Andreas> discussion period without explicitly stating it?

    You are correct that Russ's proposal is Choice 1.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)