• Re: GR: Change the resolution process

    From Russ Allbery@21:1/5 to Russ Allbery on Sat Nov 20 19:10:02 2021
    Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:

    I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1 majority, and am seeking sponsors.

    And, of course, as soon as I do that, I notice a few remaining typos.
    Please ignore this message; corrected version coming in just a few minutes.

    --
    Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Russ Allbery@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 20 19:00:01 2021
    I propose the following General Resolution, which will require a 3:1
    majority, and am seeking sponsors.


    Rationale
    =========

    We have uncovered several problems with the current constitutional
    mechanism for preparing a Technical Committee resolution or General
    Resolution for vote:

    * The timing of calling for a vote is discretionary and could be used
    strategically to cut off discussion while others were preparing
    additional ballot options.
    * The original proposer of a GR has special control over the timing of the
    vote, which could be used strategically to the disadvantage of other
    ballot options.
    * The description of the process for adding and managing additional ballot
    options is difficult to understand.
    * The current default choice of "further discussion" for a General
    Resolution has implications beyond rejecting the other options that may,
    contrary to its intent, discourage people Developers ranking it above
    options they wish to reject.

    The actual or potential implications of these problems caused conflict in
    the Technical Committee systemd vote and in GRs 2019-002 and 2021-002,
    which made it harder for the project to reach a fair and widely-respected result.

    This constitutional change attempts to address those issues by

    * separating the Technical Committee process from the General Resolution
    process since they have different needs;
    * requiring (passive) consensus among TC members that a resolution is
    ready to proceed to a vote;
    * setting a maximum discussion period for a TC resolution and then
    triggering a vote;
    * setting a maximum discussion period for a GR so that the timing of the
    vote is predictable;
    * extending the GR discussion period automatically if the ballot changes;
    * modifying the GR process to treat all ballot options equally, with a
    clearer process for addition, withdrawal, and amendment;
    * changing the default option for a GR to "none of the above"; and
    * clarifying the discretion extended to the Project Secretary.

    It also corrects a technical flaw that left the outcome of the vote for Technical Committee Chair undefined in the event of a tie, and clarifies responsibilities should the Technical Committee put forward a General Resolution under point 4.2.1.

    Effect of the General Resolution
    ================================

    The Debian Developers, by way of General Resolution, amend the Debian constitution under point 4.1.2 as follows. This General Resolution
    requires a 3:1 majority.

    Section 4.2.4
    -------------

    Strike the sentence "The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks, but may be varied by up to 1 week by the Project Leader." (A modified version of
    this provision is added to section A below.) Add to the end of this
    point:

    The default option is "None of the above."

    Section 4.2.5
    -------------

    Replace "amendments" with "ballot options."

    Section 5.1.5
    -------------

    Replace in its entirety with:

    Propose General Resolutions and ballot options for General
    Resolutions. When proposed by the Project Leader, sponsors for the
    General Resolution or ballot option are not required; see §4.2.1.

    Section 5.2.7
    -------------

    Replace "section §A.6" with "section §A.5".

    Section 6.1.7
    -------------

    Replace "section §A.6" with "section §A.5".

    Add to the end of this point:

    There is no casting vote. If there are multiple options with no
    defeats in the Schwartz set at the end of A.5.8, the winner will be
    randomly chosen from those options, via a mechanism chosen by the
    Project Secretary.

    Section 6.3
    -----------

    Replace 6.3.1 in its entirety with:

    1. Resolution process.

    The Technical Committee uses the following process to prepare a
    resolution for vote:

    1. Any member of the Technical Committee may propose a resolution.
    This creates an initial two-option ballot, the other option
    being the default option of "Further discussion." The proposer
    of the resolution becomes the proposer of the ballot option.

    2. Any member of the Technical Committee may propose additional
    ballot options or modify or withdraw a ballot option they
    proposed.

    3. If all ballot options except the default option are withdrawn,
    the process is canceled.

    4. Any member of the Technical Committee may call for a vote on the
    ballot as it currently stands. This vote begins immediately, but
    if any other member of the Technical Committee objects to
    calling for a vote before the vote completes, the vote is
    canceled and has no effect.

    5. Two weeks after the original proposal the ballot is closed to
    any changes and voting starts automatically. This vote cannot be
    canceled.

    6. If a vote is canceled under point 6.3.1.4 later than 13 days
    after the initial proposed resolution, the vote specified in
    point 6.3.1.5 instead starts 24 hours after the time of
    cancellation. During that 24 hour period, no one may call for a
    vote.

    Add a new paragraph to the start of 6.3.2 following "Details regarding
    voting":

    Votes are decided by the vote counting mechanism described in
    section §A.5. The voting period lasts for one week or until the
    outcome is no longer in doubt assuming no members change their
    votes, whichever is shorter. Members may change their votes until
    the voting period ends. There is a quorum of two. The Chair has a
    casting vote. The default option is "Further discussion."

    Strike "The Chair has a casting vote." from the existing text and make the remaining text a separate, second paragraph.

    In 6.3.3, replace "amendments" with "ballot options."

    Add, at the end of section 6.1, the following new point:

    7. Proposing a general resolution.

    When the Technical Committee proposes a general resolution or a
    ballot option in a general resolution to the project under point
    4.2.1, it may delegate the authority to withdraw, amend, or make
    minor changes to the ballot option to one of its members. If it
    does not do so, these decisions must be made by resolution of the
    Technical Committee.

    Section A
    ---------

    Replace A.0 through A.4 in their entirety with:

    A.0. Proposal

    1. The formal procedure begins when a draft resolution is proposed and
    sponsored, as required. A draft resolution must include the text of
    that resolution and a short single-line summary suitable for
    labeling the ballot choice.

    2. This draft resolution becomes a ballot option in an initial
    two-option ballot, the other option being the default option, and
    the proposer of the draft resolution becomes the proposer of that
    ballot option.

    A.1. Discussion and amendment

    1. The discussion period starts when a draft resolution is proposed
    and sponsored. The minimum discussion period is 2 weeks. The
    maximum discussion period is 3 weeks.

    2. A new ballot option may be proposed and sponsored according to the
    requirements for a new resolution.

    3. The proposer of a ballot option may amend that option provided that
    none of the sponsors of that ballot option at the time the
    amendment is proposed disagree with that change within 24 hours. If
    any of them do disagree, the ballot option is left unchanged.

    4. The addition of a ballot option or the change via a amendment of a
    ballot option changes the end of the discussion period to be one
    week from when that action was done, unless that would make the
    total discussion period shorter than the minimum discussion period
    or longer than the maximum discussion period. In the latter case,
    the length of the discussion period is instead set to the maximum
    discussion period.

    5. The proposer of a ballot option may make minor changes to that
    option (for example, typographical fixes, corrections of
    inconsistencies, or other changes which do not alter the meaning),
    providing no Developer objects within 24 hours. In this case the
    length of the discussion period is not changed. If a Developer does
    object, the change must instead be made via amendment under point
    A.1.3.

    6. The Project Leader may, at any point in the process, increase or
    decrease the minimum and maximum discussion period by up to 1 week
    from their original values in point A.1.1, except that they may not
    do so in a way that causes the discussion period to end within 48
    hours of when this change is made. The length of the discussion
    period is then recalculated as if the new minimum and maximum
    lengths had been in place during all previous ballot changes under
    points A.1.1 and A.1.4.

    7. The default option has no proposer or sponsors, and cannot be
    amended or withdrawn.

    A.2. Withdrawing ballot options

    1. The proposer of a ballot option may withdraw. If they do, new
    proposers may come forward to keep the ballot option alive, in
    which case the first person to do so becomes the new proposer and
    any others become sponsors if they aren't sponsors already. Any new
    proposer or sponsors must meet the requirements for proposing or
    sponsoring a new resolution.

    2. A sponsor of a ballot option may withdraw.

    3. If the withdrawal of the proposer and/or sponsors means that a
    ballot option has no proposer or not enough sponsors to meet the
    requirements for a new resolution, and 24 hours pass without this
    being remedied by another proposer and/or sponsors stepping
    forward, it removed from the draft ballot. This does not change
    the length of the discussion period.

    4. If all ballot options except the default option are withdrawn, the
    resolution is canceled and will not be voted on.

    A.3. Calling for a vote

    1. After the discussion period has ended, the Project Secretary will
    publish the ballot and call for a vote. The Project Secretary may
    do this immediately following the end of the discussion period and
    must do so within five days of the end of the discussion period.

    2. The Project Secretary determines the order of ballot options. At
    their discretion they may reword the single-line summaries for
    clarity.

    3. Minor changes to ballot options under point A.1.5 may not be made
    after or within 24 hours of the end of the discussion period unless
    the Project Secretary agrees the change does not alter the meaning
    of the ballot option and (if it would do so) warrants delaying the
    vote. The Project Secretary will allow 24 hours for objections
    after any such change before issuing the call for a vote.

    4. No new ballot options may be proposed, no ballot options may be
    amended, and no proposers or sponsors may withdraw within 24 hours
    of the end of the discussion period unless this action successfully
    extends the discussion period under point A.1.4 by at least 24
    additional hours.

    5. Actions to preserve the existing ballot may be taken within 24
    hours of the end of the discussion period, namely a sponsor
    objecting to an amendment under point A.1.3, a Developer objecting
    to a minor change under point A.1.5, stepping forward as the
    proposer for an existing ballot option whose original proposer has
    withdrawn it under point A.2.1, or sponsoring an existing ballot
    option that has fewer than the required number of sponsors because
    of the withdrawal of a sponsor under point A.2.2.

    6. The Project Secretary may make an exception to point A.3.4 and
    accept changes to the ballot after they are no longer allowed,
    provided that this is done at least 24 hours prior to the issuance
    of a call for a vote. All other requirements for making a change to
    the ballot must still be met. This is expected to be rare and
    should only be done if the Project Secretary believes it would be
    harmful to the best interests of the project for the change to not
    be made.

    A.4. Voting procedure

    1. Options which do not have an explicit supermajority requirement
    have a 1:1 majority requirement. The default option does not have
    any supermajority requirements.

    2. The votes are counted according to the rules in section §A.5.

    3. In cases of doubt the Project Secretary shall decide on matters of
    procedure.

    Strike section A.5 in its entirety.

    Rename section A.6 to A.5.

    Replace the paragraph at the end of section A.6 (now A.5) with:

    When the vote counting mechanism of the Standard Resolution Procedure
    is to be used, the text which refers to it must specify who has a
    casting vote, the quorum, the default option, and any supermajority
    requirement. The default option must not have any supermajority
    requirements.

    --
    Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE1zk0tJZ0z1zNmsJ4fYAxXFc23nUFAmGZNb8ACgkQfYAxXFc2 3nVeMggAgYvrtvT8tXAinKUv1gPyzPUIb0pzOEK0p8o64x/xr/swSBxy5CA2wHew Hc0eER3aeN4Sgyg6nrvAPDnJGZpXBtkICHZyAsPlTcrA15COvaoMbTusGNAJWZW1 sUzpzIjkAHp/0YneI/VtQyPjht9X3taejVwweAv6o98diQKQeWkV/OaAcudZohZc 1HrwBZXSeRjDszFb2uLE4b+87OPWp1tcXhArNakdePlXx8093XURjAjpgCemD+wE CEg6N0qNTzaTYSJuL+OBF4UHtlT4I6JF6eAh5DGrZaxB4HjzmG30qDtiLLcwuAWc sduGYTINuoCcpVeK1v9goDD3V/c7rA==Q+o+
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)