Hello,

I think the ballot is missing an option to capture the energy that I've perceived on -vote in the last few days.

Title: Reaffirm the values of the majority

============== CHOICE TEXT BELOW ==============
Debian commits to give priority, resources, and energy, to those who
actually get the work done in the distribution.

We explicitly refuse to acknowledge irrelevant political issues such as misogyny, ableism, transphobia and all other similar concerns that have
nothing to do with the technical work that is the focus of our
distribution.

We also commit to respecting and preserving the good name of the people
who write and maintain the software that we use daily. Should they
become the target of accusations that may tarnish their well earned
reputation, we will stand behind them and refuse to hold them
accountable for anything except the quality of their technical
contributions.
===============================================


Enrico

--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEJJAhGtA2CH5tHZqS0P9Jy+P0+2gFAmBoxfwACgkQ0P9Jy+P0 +2h6uhAAtpE0QSVEIbnPTXiemK1tYFJeBMkJ25W4dvGu1iP7YHHM6aFV/CJ3BOOD 3V5c5ThyUYIuxSJhD1gM7UC7/UZ5lKygGBj2SEThFMJhO3874rGY4cE5i3KB28QG A9bPCKFK6VnsP+fDuiufUQQMFv4UI51aBUJlsn02XVw8fOqL1UvqmfrFCawpH2ld a7yanMgAId+N2Ds34efOb6YYCjRlgRGJ0vD/dmkghi22EC/eXO5z72JcnCgOG5RK u6QQS2eaX8mJIGOEYOd2baW91PygwVjeea1S806Te5O7ZjDjnIhthIJvVMhuhE5u xXXiG2ZOEfZJd5raaYuFTrTB9e56SJYXv6wgp9eXMclS0WHFdQ/XUKL99wpg7RFN YI67Gp0bYx/DjyNutlD1h1j7oAjE/m3QCuwTVWWaSZ9lS93ehUAYsRpPj5nn1T+A hnzeFCiiQxivPB60k/x3aaZi4kK478pKjCs+dwxb8LuKODP+M7hYqGgIdBmYwNdM dBprhJPw3Xs0/SZeJfve/udhSNiBrx0zevKrUW8ZBhyLcqJNrPq/gkMyio5ESsN/ t6BXm+2N1HTV3lRaRdv4IGtkMOUU3XbbidOSI+DIKi/rCodHAwDFUs9pV3lQnWFo SqQ+hKM4ukNS9BeV+AC5jP7t78qaZ438OKphdkbqQ/TV1e4cyrw=
=TBJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

Thank you to Enrico Zini for another unifying proposal.

Title: Reaffirm the values of the majority

============== CHOICE TEXT BELOW ==============
Debian commits to give priority, resources, and energy, to those who
actually get the work done in the distribution.

We explicitly refuse to acknowledge irrelevant political issues such as misogyny, ableism, transphobia and all other similar concerns that have nothing to do with the technical work that is the focus of our
distribution.

We also commit to respecting and preserving the good name of the people
who write and maintain the software that we use daily. Should they
become the target of accusations that may tarnish their well earned reputation, we will stand behind them and refuse to hold them
accountable for anything except the quality of their technical
contributions.
===============================================

Seconded.

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKvBAEBCgCZFiEE8E0cIgLi+g0BiFTarFipTxFhjuAFAmBoynBfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEYw NEQxQzIyMDJFMkZBMEQwMTg4NTREQUFDNThBOTRGMTE2MThFRTAbHGZlbGl4Lmxl Y2huZXJAbGVhc2UtdXAuY29tAAoJEKxYqU8RYY7gzSYP/0LYsNQWz2UU9rJ8NBlk B9/TcHqClBL+sVnC79EZ2UkqgNbcw/B9QDW9yBgeCh28+81P3jgw6o0hvWVQYfgY Uc/QxwEjgg8tBDm/ku5/J0VPNdbKQ3IkymwV1leC/XQAJwrO7+GeWlUzb352wofR Ju48z/ftSjl9WxpWho3jvbSKhQzLeBcXD1EdGc+1GUxyyrw8qxG9dduN1cWmj9px Y6MOaniQbS6JRLx99Js20uiehC6YXZ+ytDWZx0V1D3IZT36WTiGUFDu1n26rpcge 0Wuj2FpaStmLzO6+VGIAUE/NO/sd/VTBXxVPuks11V1kEJ5gFECskDs4GNtIDXHM YGnFcF7oulfW5XsYWaXnyZ13ZaGieIm+cNJKOH4YH2778KoUzByDmgc8Kwxfcfox ui08OqyNrbLE3mcUNlrEuQkY0x4nOqsvJgk+93xokQ0A3OdME/DCpqKyCK+VBd6T fgN2el1+zvoUVpUwbbHMB6/yZzI/V8AxmZhI8lpP/H6UvawLpcExmZg9nFj5y+Yr /YVQZCkjHEnbioyKK9y5DDmBFZObOElZYYkwYcCw0wLGwbYVrQWp9AOndTaydJMg 1e0DFt6duKzuUfxzmRaIU7R8s/QPU8ShY7H4fyAmWSR1JCyDkiWGJLFktYyYwNU8 2YZZ+WZDAG6fgJZVABWXlBdn
=hMxP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 03 Apr 2021 at 21:46:08 +0200, someone claiming to be Enrico Zini wrote:

We explicitly refuse to acknowledge irrelevant political issues

I was surprised to read this apparently coming from Enrico, particularly
since it doesn't seem consistent with what Enrico has said in other
threads regarding RMS. It turns out not to be signed with the same key.

Key fingerprint used to sign <https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2021/03/msg00286.html>, matching
Enrico's key in the official Debian keyring:
1793 D6AB 7566 3E6B F104 953A 634F 4BD1 E7AD 5568

Key fingerprint used to sign the message to which I'm replying:
2490 211A D036 087E 6D1D 9A92 D0FF 49CB E3F4 FB68

It seems highly likely that the message to which I'm replying was not
sent or authorized by Enrico, and that its sender is trying to mislead
Debian members by impersonating a prominent and respected developer.

I don't think passing off a message as coming from a different author is consistent with taking any sort of moral high ground (for example based
on a position of free speech, meritocracy or opposing "cancel culture")
and I'm disappointed to see it on Debian mailing lists.

smcv

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEENuxaZEik9e95vv6Y4FrhR4+BTE8FAmBo8WkACgkQ4FrhR4+B TE9Cxw/+Ira5en0moQPXx3ft+2g2qdMvnI5LlPj4M44UbaJQWVg8cK39qB6MRTRa v00+qJ3UWfrtyOjCv3TB3poihfpuGGgMwknk6jJpbMsFmuRmZv/jj9NbHxHZ+tU0 Vg9vF1HyrUqpvdHWTLaIf7tDnhSEWR5OZCTTEUbw8HPun7grzRS0jaJnOnWMKVdF 2WmZ1K1SD7hjBKjmPxpJkH4eokSKoroGlX26TQuCKECFUNTGp+r4298Xu8bztiWf CZRjAd7PNyR5EdVDLVOoqEHN/ijg16/tT3Aj+sCLCToH2EGxRsgOidxSOkQGLc52 DVqiuRHUtTuFfQ2eC5sUh2xUdPbUG+PNB/49LHO13nID6NaIXMpAAWBTuRJ84DV5 ifiihBNZti/A4CGXl9ADRaQe9LAo7xhcTBZnuIYey6Q84+X76GRx4Svmsu7X5jWs gPxq+5+rZ4z0d4vBw+atXvFiJHn44rLnEhcnYdbft8A3kV1tons3+rO9GurJ8ZSb Bc9QjPhM4uRJFhqCdJVnNTXzHBh38k+wGSBdc2jpQGVbTDtPEP7RK8MGeO3RX/R1 Y1zhdxYSSC1jL8qyFwe0kelVZ3pWydqKAOe54pPg8a1DArJEU7YIPJ6xPUJa0Pfx oTssUTLjjss+5Z8lOs8PgGpCRCPDIVFW1JZx1U2fJjS5gc4A1qY=
=KB6z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, 03 Apr 2021 21:46:08 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:

Hello,

Hm?

| --
| GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
|
| [-- End of signed data --]
|
| [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Apr 4 00:09:30 2021) --]
| gpg: Signature made Sat Apr 3 21:46:04 2021 CEST
| gpg: using RSA key 2490211AD036087E6D1D9A92D0FF49CBE3F4FB68
| gpg: requesting key 0xD0FF49CBE3F4FB68 from hkps server hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
| gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
| [-- End of PGP output --]


Cheers,
gregor

--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
`- NP: Orquesta Aragon: El Charlatan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE0eExbpOnYKgQTYX6uzpoAYZJqgYFAmBo6N9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEQx RTEzMTZFOTNBNzYwQTgxMDREODVGQUJCM0E2ODAxODY0OUFBMDYACgkQuzpoAYZJ qgZD/g//eSPF6mWokitHHAUxo3WlTQMH/SlXAYqOFkxN4I48oHzDycKnscpiUd2U XYfbidmTSSNuhFhb1N6hOZ+yihklFXfgd7xF9Tf+2hW8Y/kozSgveGJWspAZi2yj PFOA9WNDuc24cNQw3fzF8IQqm1NASGGtWR77UOsMTLummRcCpdySsYRz1SkN58B6 MmlsWwkg+syodFnrCrTtJLAwj4vlntsTDIVTKpBdc5/aK+MvwP+MlTNGXvNd1H8N ROg0LODDX0Ig+0wkK+qF037jJexW0/Fku7Qd6g7kCYI0PWmBzOQwAWgYkgnf4j6c zdrULwlvQkpZt+MKuKo0SXaMqJVN+g5jG9k+zcIEx/kebLNryT/19gJnLEf1OEaQ 4KCVL/wToncJ1IJWhoYOkN/PSw5Lw6zU4OabfarHOxkLkU6mMxymWF/Mu62Ey4TX QNOGfU/HhEPoPxN00Hs+xyXa2VPDUuHypE9cLBwF4xXaOUoehhNSuaAkscM7L4AW RoLKDL/+8i9U5U2HMqEqZYMR3xo75lhMQ27J+JN9lds5XqNh1sd755TuPJUZa5ST 2QfWQ413EQagChggD7LNa8Xlk2gnTpvj4Lic7dpEdkFiCKCsdk4YHebO+4+5Rds1 e59bViNNs3ZC2VGNdTFLx0kOnN+GwS438iG/34RjvUdcstlfURQ=
=fOWU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:51:29PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:

It seems highly likely that the message to which I'm replying was not
sent or authorized by Enrico, and that its sender is trying to mislead
Debian members by impersonating a prominent and respected developer.

IRC revealed that the key used to sign this message might or might
not be the same as the one used to sign a message on April 1st.

</spoiler alert>

IOW: I do "blame" Enrico for that mail, too. I also think it was one of the best mails in these threads, by far.


--
cheers,
Holger

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
⠈⠳⣄

I'm looking forward to Corona being a beer again and Donald a duck.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmBpBTgACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhwM7w//aQlddrynSox3iVxMX57vcT5kL39y8TsSo86HCSr5tW8oznNWYI9RzW6d 0msFcU/4vqB3TggPBpFs/sa9PRS9keROGYzYssJ3up3C+Ys841m+pNKeimRb9y6E gfT6dnpEVOrEKBKe2KjoVvza7IYFMtI9k+bimZkQw4SgWTSefhvvT+AxY9hqwqY6 4XqwGYa6hmudCdCHbrpTx9VKuEdgVhjwLcmj58LlNLyve1OOMcpf+ZKXeBlxdAuj tap8TBs09CXDGTt92jFDU8W0z3uF+ZS01tVKhs9yA9ZgnvhEVYk06X40dfqIKDoc VsblRFqALNG5BnX73OhW0T15NOA/NfLvUlv3WS8ryDPnG3cfMl582vhCYPNGpTWN OLSoCp/8nzxhtZCQqivt6ZZL1sk6HcRNsPEFLomxR2BJOCZ/A1GzxUUuu0v2vrlN TYK+Ao3K1Ss+3tFHS8sM07WA5oOAavc1KuSJY1GfoQ+wCIlKHUNicCHtWJxigFks ZWWNuB94UAFtbVEW0Jza1/G/BsU8Tdav8MJo/fODhaxZ7raf6jFXudJEr0jVpBY4 tmpvih5m5jOpqNAn9UdmmNX00

Am So., 4. Apr. 2021 um 00:51 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>:

On Sat, 03 Apr 2021 at 21:46:08 +0200, someone claiming to be Enrico Zini wrote:

We explicitly refuse to acknowledge irrelevant political issues

I was surprised to read this apparently coming from Enrico, particularly since it doesn't seem consistent with what Enrico has said in other
threads regarding RMS. It turns out not to be signed with the same key.
[...]

I did actually read this as satire and was quite amused by it - I
didn't think it could have been read as a serious request until the
first response to it.
And writing satire is something Enrico would absolutely do ;-)

Cheers,
Matthias

--
I welcome VSRE emails. See http://vsre.info/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:51:29PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:

It seems highly likely that the message to which I'm replying was not
sent or authorized by Enrico, and that its sender is trying to mislead
Debian members by impersonating a prominent and respected developer.

I can confirm it was not an impersonation attempt. My previous subkeys
are due to expire on 2021-06-03 and I've recently generated new ones.
They should be properly signed by my master key and I have uploaded them
to keyserver.ubuntu.com and keyring.debian.org

Using GPG became more complicated recently with the keyserver network collapsing, and on a different venue I'd welcome a serious reassessment
of our technical practices of certifying trust :(

My proposal was a honest attempt at encoding in a straightforward
proposal the gist that I was perceiving from what seemed to me like the majority of posts on -vote. I was honestly interested to see if that represented the feelings of our community at large. If those are indeed
the feelings of the majority of a community I'm part of, it is extremely important for me to know.

Even so, my proposal, although serious, was motivated mainly by
frustration, disappointment, and disgust.


Enrico

--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEJJAhGtA2CH5tHZqS0P9Jy+P0+2gFAmBpZCwACgkQ0P9Jy+P0 +2iZ8A//ZMCiYe5JbjKF8etHLSwLHm8usJrqNwERibyFgP5CnYOdQ6SJq37BG7ck /cBA0r5cwAmy27SBcjfpHUl5NWBx65lN5WtpXPM/A06hNzLQjeWlw9PvHIsrz2UY GUTUnIZJdek5Yxjvv7rd8lZCgLOsCRGdgFtgCU15/jRbOadUrzcN5rJfrao7kECH YdCwDh7Ug96oKujt6KX5DcClBc3/y+gQ8Q4qOnEHizJQrrrZ7hAmbs+Mc0QN4+HG J5yZDa8DYxHnbXorvLu4miNYpBf0vb/f+7jlm0bgro+guI+iNs47htX5JlvHAPNO bdo3OjvcF1UN1VsBnKIgDJVRojF6CbSMGB+NjDNmRvW5ezTIo3H6V/w+KNorygAe vyo75exSyDtEX3M074CbUioMEfXZRVmo2g8BiE0D9CwIyP3sWwgbNRpIWsc028n/ qbtbwdM9gQU6dhFiBEco69r6fj4QeX8W+5zFSPLw6OdIEmHk3TXm1tnoLZgCWs4d dFyF2wtDDlCBg8fwnPdqJtpxh8LiFUqCE9za4bLVtnjx9wM5CI3DBIyu9Jae4Weu Vnq1nz5NmEkwFF030okEhTByPQ+KKmGlZ4uMVMRcVb0bU9dDSzs5sa6izvVH3J7L UdndQZ3l8vbUUUdae9BdqGCcwrqi7GwoTGHLoPcgR0XFOB1F9VA=
=Xbnt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2021/04/04 05:47, Matthias Klumpp wrote:

I did actually read this as satire and was quite amused by it - I
didn't think it could have been read as a serious request until the
first response to it.

I would appreciate it if we could keep satire and comedy a bit dialed
back for a but. As much as I appreciate satire and comedy, there is a
place and time for it, for example, you wouldn't practice your stand-up
routine at a funeral for a loved one. Also, there are classes of humor
that's really just not appropriate, and on top of all that, many of is
in the project are suffering from huge information overload. That is, we
have a backlog of information that needs to be processed, some which
will also affect the choices of both votes currently running. Adding
more noise that is difficult to filter and interpret is something that I consider somewhere on a spectrum of insensitive to reckless.

So, I'm please asking again that posters to the list attempt to be more
mindful of what they consider to be humor to the list and the effects it
may have on others before doing so.

-Jonathan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"MK" == Matthias Klumpp <matthias@tenstral.net> writes:

MK> I did actually read this as satire and was quite amused by it

I’m not amused by it. I liked the 1st April joke, but this is not fun anymore and the fact that someone as respectful as Enrico does that
makes me thinking about some ballot options in a different light.

I’d like to get rid of this matter and vote ASAP but considering
something important and related can happen in two weeks (e.g. the whole
FSF board may resign), is it possible to change a vote later during the
voting period? According to the constitution, 4.2.6, “The Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change their votes.” but I can’t see this information in the ballot e-mail.

Regards,
Milan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 06:09:53PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:

"MK" == Matthias Klumpp <matthias@tenstral.net> writes:

MK> I did actually read this as satire and was quite amused by it

I’m not amused by it. I liked the 1st April joke, but this is not fun anymore and the fact that someone as respectful as Enrico does that
makes me thinking about some ballot options in a different light.

I’d like to get rid of this matter and vote ASAP but considering
something important and related can happen in two weeks (e.g. the whole
FSF board may resign), is it possible to change a vote later during the voting period? According to the constitution, 4.2.6, “The Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change their votes.” but I can’t see this information in the ballot e-mail.

The software always allows you to change your vote.


Kurt

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)