This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------G0YquG74FKxqwPf0n0BvoZBR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2021-11-08 12 h 01, Sam Hartman wrote:

Russ made a final call for informal discussion.
I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to handle secret ballots
now, or in a separate GR.

I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.

Although I welcome Russ' & al. efforts in modernising our voting
mechanism, I have to say the proposed changes are already complex enough
that I haven't found the time and energy to go through them seriously.

Adding yet another change to this proposal would only make things more
complex and make the issues at hand harder to understand.

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄

--------------G0YquG74FKxqwPf0n0BvoZBR--

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQTKp0AHB6gWsCAvw830JXpQshz6hQUCYYlaggAKCRD0JXpQshz6 hQJqAP4qRAxl41RYxNhxCFigmRouTSLeB2uG7O1CxHb+6zGIHQEAjhF5N0msIuVY SL/4EvST2rybLCn1ib3qP+NyW7RCyA0=
=Gjds
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:12:33PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:

I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to handle secret ballots now, or in a separate GR.

I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.

[...]

Adding yet another change to this proposal would only make things more complex and make the issues at hand harder to understand.

all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.


--
cheers,
Holger

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄

Bottled water companies don't produce water, they produce plastic bottles.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmGJXHkACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhzGlQ/+J3BCnGGTUH0wgJ7K5LooJHJ4jRoP486IpHdqIs/7lBfpy4YtCZ+pT74z b865kNQO9pZAgtaD7k2iyum4oogTd84SBBLK/+RBMlyb9XOznwR9fVZkz25zcfwQ 3JMfm5eRzGo9qnzdSZJj+2YtpSqRlOk5QN1/+aqslE1Gr+Kt4gsNDIrnBhI7gnFH +gQ96N+8cnrPd5LiRruRdzVTv3KjAMnUSm42bZnoV3cqlSeMDPd0hna+eJXJ67E4 CYDcf39dJPwcjOEwFeK0+rMIrTTR9G70/1TX/m95A6GFk8t+2NPsHNr+cxCO1D1B zQIQ+JKqo83yNNU94rIHgiwsm+as08YGVKjIqLWU+rSNACEnozryraC1ALck1h0W ZEWZsywozRAKa0R4B6KyHfSIM6hyIAK0MjYFw1w8GreSiiVJr+brW4P1Gi+ZVIU6 lholAIz12JfxuTTajfqJep9rCYHs3Mhd6qnfutuHhvFAsRgP8fEyegcZWoKhx9Gc 6wxbpE7oFPuzKKn0ylFFodeyCvXajWZw4V+gplT0AzUOaXVOsYuIrdfnVs43AEIT FB6dWHN0/esmKJVxo2DytkINx4J1c3cckmegKj

Holger> all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it
Holger> disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.


I'm frustrated reading this message because it sounds like you've jumped
to the assumption that I'm hijacking Russ's work without coordinating
with him.
I don't think you've asked either Russ or me that.
As it turns out, Russ, Pierre-Elliott and I have been discussing voting
changes for months, and we've been splitting the energy of who works on
what.
Pierre-Elliott was originally working on secret ballots, but got busy
and was in favor of me bringing the question forward.

I hope that in similar future situations, you ask rather than jumping to disrespect.

--Sam

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> writes:

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:12:33PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:

I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.

[...]

Adding yet another change to this proposal would only make things more
complex and make the issues at hand harder to understand.

all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.

Sam asked me explicitly if I would mind if he took this approach before bringing it up here and I have (and had) no objections. (I have no strong feelings either way about whether to run this as a separate GR and am
happy to go with whatever the project consensus seems to be.)

--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AhGtovREyf3wDE3v2EdAhgyKtNS1SbVfn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Your proposal seems fine at first glance. I would prefer to see this
handled as a separate GR. If they don't conflict textually, you could
run them in parallel, but honestly I'd prefer to see them run in series.
A few more weeks of delay doesn't seem to be a problem for this topic.

--
Richard


--AhGtovREyf3wDE3v2EdAhgyKtNS1SbVfn--

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE1Ot9lOeOTujs4H+U+HlhmcBFhs4FAmGJYQYACgkQ+HlhmcBF hs4Fzg//ZxgFBsZJu/eZiQHDu0wFaIwGsc4BrkZM9lSwZYoX9f5BwNkE1f6FR+eY SubHHpqiTXY6cj0isvmTnL530aknYeUQZMFdc9yeEMoacauojZa6eeXU43VXZOtQ FRx/z3X+XeBS6lFrdmu9aq4VhpOqAWKrM4gFYCzfSmM4518iTLf7gT3B/iUa0I1O Vz/1Rg7BuRoOoZDzSVC45ty82mwR+qOoHsmrB7rPdtvZDvJyXz4T5h/TrQyt/p3L vFvsO23XM0h0WxB7abglnVgHO9dpLEKcWQm7DQfPVQnf2POBmWyGIzjJJFUoN4T9 WNnCsjbeGgVlOrDsyB1wpHF4gQ45f1vij52rO4fVW9e54kwR/W9sl7AMbtjaic+Y 0PGQln7gaHVg9WgW+leINP/7tk0xOVVSTnwGJNTEvcW1sJJgP/GOKb3k6pU62w6x qdkymL3AnZALhuI2vZMjbcTczjv9Nodtl7h8KYne1EbLcFuwQ1WHQdP/AlDHAh34 EK9Po9PUD/mV5sIRZKQ3FX4Z82lodOhF8IxOdEglqwNIxZfzFSRyE25t6dqT69G6 7QD6tOyvE9MQtvX2pPJC5PRNSUq+Mk/QeTXxeTdUaELWR/a4Hz7oGvweU/2LQWhU yMXt7o1md6DYSIrmU/0FJW76NtfzuPJB8QcHSvVdL8/w91KWWa0=
=3cxG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 10:38:01AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:

Holger> all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it
Holger> disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.
I'm frustrated reading this message because it sounds like you've jumped
to the assumption that I'm hijacking Russ's work without coordinating
with him.

I'm frustrated you read "I would find it disrectful" as disrespectful.
I didn't know whether you coordinated with Russ and I did not claim
anything in that regard.

*I* find it disrespectful to piggyback on Russ' proposal and I respect
you and Russ disagree with me.

I hope that in similar future situations, you ask rather than jumping to disrespect.

Same same.

And, I'd hope that in the future a GR on secret ballots will fail. Because, they won't be secret (because they cannot be in technical terms) and
they would fuel a cabal.

And there should be less cabals in Debian.

If you find this opinion disrespectful as well...


--
cheers,
Holger

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄

Life may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmGJZ0UACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhz1Og//c3dT3S7VtzeRfu+CK0bJri/2lbbPcEQnRrEWBHSfkYCTwSJdEsypPVIs +PTeekTdFbJkbLURe+wPgVT6tS0+d8df7o8V4lFRxY42kHf2GvT/9uSsxxHowR+l CUyP5m2h6tKtimxY7dkvql7WqScEgn7WOpR+kmilzDieu7uqgorkFBvbj3zwVLph msfthBCuXuk/75kh1cUsH7+f32PqntsUSowoASAn7zamaOX2cqbWtIfoq1Rc+Hsb 13PocBDv1WwuNUog2haohs2WXKAX2r6E1DlHtho1YRLWpR2fYU5Pl1x+t9eZEfb6 2WoMo8kTyXBD6pTi0Mh+z6GNpuEXMyOfwngb0mtn0Gr+51rTYSJL1O9MX8Y5Ex3Z m9Uhc9n3N73uXqmv52lrIMygsOFhomP5scJ/+GN4sI5CQElup5OD5WpmW16j+MIZ 2ABtk29cX3ZNGrEwNylUm3lVUNXYVBzL9xP8M38cI6dw4DX2HN+vRXeYe3X1DlYZ bmiLVBBfE6cBGbG/CIlhrymoP6YpbI3b1ITfO8qbItm435wmFYUy8CTb2MgItkyo Ed+UG0LB4s8L0dtG653ng0qIErh

Hi

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:38 AM Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> wrote:

rather than jumping to disrespect.

Please let's not fight fire with fire. I found Holger's comment quite compassionate—at least compared to the comments he directed at me—and
would like to congratulate him.

He did not know that his facts were off. Neither did anyone else.

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote on 08/11/2021 at 18:21:02+0100:

[[PGP Signed Part:No public key for 091AB856069AAA1C created at 2021-11-08T18:20:57+0100 using RSA]]
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 12:12:33PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:

I'd like to ask the community whether we'd like to handle secret ballots >> > now, or in a separate GR.

I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.

[...]

Adding yet another change to this proposal would only make things more
complex and make the issues at hand harder to understand.

all of this and additionally personally I'd also find it disrespectful to hijack/piggyback (on) Russ' work.

Hi Holger,

Sorry if it seemed (as I'm one of the drafters of the secret ballot and
Russ' proposal, I feel a bit responsible for this) that there was an
attempt to hijack anything.

A bit of context:

When the GR about RMS occurred, I expressed my intent to have some
changes made to the Constitution, in particular regarding secret
voting. Russ reacted because he had also things in his mind he wanted to
see become more concrete and we started a discussion that took quite
some time at a time when I was a bit more available. Sam joined us in
the discussion and Wouter also at some point recently.

Then, and I'm at fault I think (because I got drowned in my personal
life stuff and did not state it clearly to Sam and Russ), things kind of
went under the dust until we attempted to resume.

In the meantime, it became clear that proposing Secret Voting and the
other changes was not going to be easy because it made quite a lot. So
Russ went on with everything except Secret Voting.

Then, we realized that we could probably add Secret voting (if it felt
right to everyone) as the discussion on Russ' proposal didn't go in a
too consuming spiral.

Russ said he was not against the idea.

Hence Sam's mail, which, despite what it could have inspired to you, is
not an attempt to hijack or piggyback any work made by Russ or anyone
else.

I hope this helps.

Cheers! :)

--
PEB

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJDBAEBCgAtFiEESYqTBWsFJgT6y8ijKb+g0HkpCsoFAmGKyioPHHBlYkBkZWJp YW4ub3JnAAoJECm/oNB5KQrKCrsQAJ+Ee13Mk/eF5dUh7HF85ufF++fDl8WzCSfs dVrP769kAMefEquPoj6phZp2NXMshVojyOR6PrSKqc590aD8vhVxpkVkHV279q/C 0M1KgXk1xl0KkNYjTGuECk0ZHNYgmcmkq7bDt6kgbBJ7iAGCzfNDA4JBz0SBxL8l mxMzfXBpGKLHTiwr3PK66rDC1FBEwu9544PkPq1jW9Q2uOSZsm1UnGbnhUY1hKp5 wwe/FWGJUwjtSK0yIYkVvNb7I7yfEolCBjJ21Rg0GOTlt5mg3L0Q5dK373BVeBh3 vr9urjAoUWNgvpLQie21QXX4GKEZhHCdGaDNcA1KK7rhtdDXjL3hD9I17E0A83FN YGjt6SNBnld9swsjUd73ErFGs20r7bEQSawP25Bit753bByo8P+D9Pp9HTbRO6n8 AJGcOCE0kb4B2g0aVHJmWWX6PsctxcvwJCPoukz+QRITQoNjo2Mqxugteh8XjqLX QSRfdE4QEc+8ikTnIvRokI489/nHyB2cTgm0wctyId+GQTO0gRNPwy/6PG5/Vhd4 nTraFW1bvkI6Fv90mmOXT6SOkQXiSaEcUx73TUaTWVf1GtXe/ust0I0OOzaw4Y7b gxXcOAPiT8+45Nro6sAKDsTMmmLzXFjXbfRn5KX2R/RBYSr2xb15SzqDk1XYOz5y
uiE3J62w
=JRwt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org> writes:

Then, we realized that we could probably add Secret voting (if it felt
right to everyone) as the discussion on Russ' proposal didn't go in a
too consuming spiral.

Perahaps this exposes a distinction between those of you who have spent
a lot of time thinking about these issues recently and feel that they
all more or less are part of the same whole, and others of us who are
trying to follow along relatively casually knowing we'll be asked to
vote at some point?

I'm pretty confident we can collectively figure out how to vote
meaningfully in either case, but I'd personally prefer to see secret
voting treated as a separate GR with opportunities for significant
consensus building before a vote is called.

Bdale

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEHguq2FwiMqGzzpLrtwRxBYMLn6EFAmGLN8oACgkQtwRxBYML n6Gnuw/9FDAMcsWbvIc5XAjnH1bCZmK83vQFncMxgUhaG2t8iK881Kzg1/6ZrqLc rbXDBVMddWEvL8GfCa/irbN+CZFoQfHopzaVmurjCtBUMPxG3apijMxNVRyE/GxF Gk8C/iUJuOh44maXeVkDCORMMPv8ybmg77mHk7FXhevqjswJGqhRUTrZq2o7edlh 5KqnIPRpeymltRjJv+JjsAsLzpBGzlRqNjIBz7va8xNG9xNFW+fG3lcMtAxCwNIg DlnkkNdO1seowRBq+SZknnSLubk1qDdBi6+CAT4d7fokRkrvKAnl8OFjSfAhsn5c xvKDPcHlIVo5UD7bZNqfcJem4VT9QnAT1hgJeMECFA8gBJgY5rA+gO6vGKCGNVbf vm7ir9IsRWWUWWiW3fY2BD9Dne2C0/sGYB1eYV0WJHsVZRf5O6Y0257WyGRJZ+eB CDrGlaS21UZBqUt++rwGdRCCxFbZMb6ULaJf6YnBHHD5PPNOiIA8rtkk1okrZ2vb cfaomTPCaqv61Bh1e1P1oFhhyMxKtd4OfR6rXfY+QoLn7yIXovASJ9qAE4jT7yrW FpS1y0MNrcER12tCcGZ2U7UKXR5z/MtuTZBH3JdmCbIzeHK0yBTnfWPQU8W6/4qI P+OqWlNoR5CF7FCkvgiIw3DTl0ZOsWQ9r0iQmrTxNFRVOhpI/Vs=lY36
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> writes:

I'd tend to be in favor of making this a separate GR.

I agree.

Bdale

--=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEHguq2FwiMqGzzpLrtwRxBYMLn6EFAmGLNlgACgkQtwRxBYML n6Hm4RAAsElDdJiU4YSAdKvx1Zembg3Sgo++huQdDd2vE7poh0nxPLBefmy0jh45 LJxdwINyJmjrCN5SpTdCK3p1UZPfnJmY1Ru9im9nxL1jpNE0vlFN9IMhKlXUgUcH zHfeb/QLqPL7FyADd40AA9w83mJJaRtxf2yBl+C36U5YMKpD/lZS1O+M49Opa+jD VVAYfSZdCPHOviPASRChZUPfi5qEKs6ZhzL3LP2zp2fBgCDsz/hRWwe2num2WWzl KCe/YCGE46LICMS3aJ3p5p5/6U7LWjiQnAiJu0M6oZry/0uis/kmNMdEPo0Ky4re uFs9xBEacvFHp3Dslehx7mJo8hyF7BFm4oLn6nS9qn0VgqMyh2ptU/E2f7yXHoJr VjAVGLQqrMXWRyf1YsXF0ic/5IFWcr/CmqSLFe6BGZtMzzFjXWmFAawjc5LKpYzT +TQCZoNsmrd8YJJdgXAeI10211MHYrsdA5Tnsk/qsHXSr/wMXTQALYL6CDR0XDR8 2f9BPKr3Qp6Y0mXc66BAz4zHjYnjEZZPWNouUPOrmH2oGe4EEPSxsoSzjHJ2sOwz xYHtVwyuWJs400F+zIBGgaUDJgIm9LKtOoPXsnVILfhJgTYb/IuAU4iwSmvU2wca CoOZdZJ10caIOedWYFD8PtZGCZNePAqjKJrEcEMqJ+NSvo3hRdg=+MTU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:

new:
6. Votes are cast in a manner suitable to the Secretary. The
Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change their
votes.

The manner needs to also be suitable to the voters.

FTR, I'd also prefer a separate GR.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"Carsten" == Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org> writes:

Carsten> FTR, I'd also prefer a separate GR.

Since no one prefers combining these efforts, let's come back to secret
ballots after Russ's resolution is resolved.

Carsten> Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:
>> new: 6. Votes are cast in a manner suitable to the Secretary. The
>> Secretary determines for each poll whether voters can change
>> their votes.

Carsten> The manner needs to also be suitable to the voters.

Thanks for bringing this issue forward.

Looking over the constitution, it looks like the
developers as a whole have no recourse if they disagree with a decision
of the secretary.
We can bikeshed on what rules lawyering we could apply to effectively
get to a new secretary in the shortest time in that case.
(Yes, I do see paths for doing that).
Instead, let's not and consider the idea that we should provide some
mechanism for the developers to disagree with the secretary over
something like this.
And yes, I think it's fine for that to be part of the secret ballot
work.




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYIAB0WIQSj2jRwbAdKzGY/4uAsbEw8qDeGdAUCYYv1VwAKCRAsbEw8qDeG dESlAP9SXGmPxSJrgnStvLDSo+3GE5QAZWm4ZvnVTyQcVdjvIAD/RUbvZMOrymHT 2U6V/nFpNozwl/SIFLKx0pIj45lMAgQ=
=9zvX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)