Hi,
It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point release.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
reasons. :-)
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point release.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
reasons. :-)
Regards,
Adam
Hi,
It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point >release.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
reasons. :-)
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
Hi,
It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point >release.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
reasons. :-)
Regards,
Adam
El 15 de marzo de 2021 13:33:15 CET, "Adam D. Barratt" ><adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> escribió:
Hi,
It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point >>release.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
All those dates work for publicity team.
Kind regards,
I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
reasons. :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
Sent with K-9 mail
<br>It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point<br>release.<br><br>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for<br>the following:<br><br>- March 27th<br>- April 3rd<br>- April 10th<br><br></blockquote><br>All those dates work for publicity team.<br><br>Kind regards,<br><br><b
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:33:15PM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote:
Hi,
It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point >>release.
Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
the following:
- March 27th
- April 3rd
- April 10th
I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
reasons. :-)
Any of those are possible, but I'#d much prefer the 27th if
possible. The 3rd is Easter weekend, and I do have tentative plans.
Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for
the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for
then.
We've been hard at work testing and fixing things for the last couple
of weeks, but it's been slow going. We've *just* had a 15.3-rc3
release candidate published last night. Even if that all looks OK and
we don't find any more bugs in testing (fingers crossed!), we're not
going to have a proper 15.3 release ready to go for
review/testing/signing in time for it to make it into a buster point
release next weekend.
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for
the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for
then.
We've been hard at work testing and fixing things for the last couple
of weeks, but it's been slow going. We've *just* had a 15.3-rc3
release candidate published last night. Even if that all looks OK and
we don't find any more bugs in testing (fingers crossed!), we're not
going to have a proper 15.3 release ready to go for
review/testing/signing in time for it to make it into a buster point
release next weekend.
Thanks for the update. :-(
Do you have a sense of when things _might_ be ready? Depending on
timings it might be worth us getting the bulk of 10.9 out of the way
and working out what to do about shim later on.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:24:45PM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote:
Hi Steve,
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 11:42 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Houston, we have a problem. I know that you've announced the 27th for
the point release, but we're not going to have a new shim ready for
then.
We've been hard at work testing and fixing things for the last couple
of weeks, but it's been slow going. We've *just* had a 15.3-rc3
release candidate published last night. Even if that all looks OK and
we don't find any more bugs in testing (fingers crossed!), we're not
going to have a proper 15.3 release ready to go for
review/testing/signing in time for it to make it into a buster point
release next weekend.
Thanks for the update. :-(
Do you have a sense of when things _might_ be ready? Depending on
timings it might be worth us getting the bulk of 10.9 out of the way
and working out what to do about shim later on.
At this point, I do not have a lot of confidence to pick a reliable >substitute date. Once we have a 15.3 release *done*, I'm thinking
adding a couple of weeks after that point is probably the most
sensible thing we can do. That's enough notice for the teams, I hope?
And it will be enough time to get stuff reviewed and signed. I'll be
one of the people driving the review process, and the reviews for this
round should be minimal - we'll be using a totally vanilla new release
with no local patches.
I'll keep you updated as soon as i have any news.
In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release as already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with basically *just* the shim/SB changes? I'm OK to go with that option if
that's our preferred route as a group.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:14:31PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
In fact, how about: we *could* go ahead with the 10.9 point release asIs there actually a rush to get 10.10 out? Are people eager to push out >revocations? Or can we do it on our normal cadence, some time in May or >thereabouts, without adverse consequences?
already planned, and expect to do a 10.10 a couple of weeks later with
basically *just* the shim/SB changes? I'm OK to go with that option if
that's our preferred route as a group.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 292 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 187:19:04 |
Calls: | 6,616 |
Files: | 12,165 |
Messages: | 5,314,969 |