I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n").No.
In this situation, should the maintainer make a patch converting this files to
the Unix pattern LF?
Or to Debian is 'acceptable' to build a package from source keeping the MS-DOSWhy should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are
pattern CRLF?
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:25:53PM -0300, Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior wrote:
I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n").No.
In this situation, should the maintainer make a patch converting this files to
the Unix pattern LF?
Or to Debian is 'acceptable' to build a package from source keeping the MS-DOSWhy should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are technical problems caused by that?
pattern CRLF?
As Andrey says: No need to change CRLF end of line into a LF e.o.l.The question is about the upstream source code, not to the debian directory.
Thank so much.
Why should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are technical problems caused by that?
So such as not compiling. Or another reason not yet shared with us.
Why should it matter to anything, including Debian, unless there are technical problems caused by that?
So such as not compiling. Or another reason not yet shared with us.
No problem with building the package. I just saw a comment on a bug and I was in doubt [1].
I decided to ask first. I'm a complete novice and I'm trying to make things right.
Thank you Andrey and Geert.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698359#10
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 299 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 72:01:35 |
Calls: | 6,694 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,228 |
Messages: | 5,346,590 |
Posted today: | 1 |