• Bug#1001930: sponsorship-requests: Request for Package (RFP): gammy

    From Randal South@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 05:20:01 2021
    Package: sponsorship-requests
    Severity: wishlist

    Dear Maintainer,

    *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

    * What led up to the situation? Eye irritation from blue light
    * damage.
    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
    ineffective)? Attempted to color correct with redshift.
    * What was the outcome of this action? Too red.
    * What outcome did you expect instead? Fine degrees of control with
    * both color and brightness adjustment.

    *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: 10.11
    APT prefers oldstable-updates
    APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
    Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

    Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-18-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
    Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
    Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
    Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
    LSM: AppArmor: enabled

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 19 23:40:01 2021
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:29:13 +0100
    with message-id <b8a5b869-6939-e4ac-976a-e664478859de@debian.org>
    and subject line Re: sponsorship-requests: Request for Package (RFP): gammy
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1001930,
    regarding sponsorship-requests: Request for Package (RFP): gammy
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1001930: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001930
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2021 04:09:44 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2018-09-13) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,HAS_PACKAGE,
    RDNS_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,XMAILER_REPORTBUG,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 149; neutral, 55; spammy, 1.
    spammytokens:0.947-+--H*r:bugs.debian.org
    hammytokens:0.000-+--H*UA:deb10u1, 0.000-+--H*M:reportbug,
    0.000-+--H*MI:reportbug, 0.000-+--H*x:7.5.3, 0.000-+--H*UA:7.5.3 Return-path: <bugreport@sonic.net>
    Received: from [2601:647:5c80:2730::2] (port=44586 helo=[127.0.1.1])
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92)
    (envelope-from <bugreport@sonic.net>)
    id 1mynW3-0006JR-2w