As another example, I did see an X11 image viewer that was just named
feh after it's executable so that might not be a big issue.
And second, this might be a question for a different list, but I'm not
sure how to best enter in the license information. According to their
LICENSE file, it can be redistributed under either the GPL 3.0 license
or the Apache 2.0 Software License, both approved for Debian. I was considering just listing it as one of them, but I don't know if that's proper.
--
Loren M. Lang
lorenl@north-winds.org
http://www.north-winds.org/
Public Key: ftp://ftp.north-winds.org/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: 10A0 7AE2 DAF5 4780 888A 3FA4 DCEE BB39 7654 DE5B
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 299 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 72:46:05 |
Calls: | 6,694 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 12,228 |
Messages: | 5,346,772 |
Posted today: | 1 |