• Advice about a package fork (displaycal)

    From Christian Marillat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 5 08:40:01 2022
    Hi,

    [Please Cc me I'm not subscribed to this list]

    I was the displaycal (python2 version) maintainer but asked his removal
    as the curren maintain doesn't reply to e-mails

    A fork has been done, but as discussed in https://github.com/eoyilmaz/displaycal-py3/issues/96
    people do not agree to the license and project.binary name.

    Can you give me your opinion ?

    Christian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Francesco Poli@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 5 23:40:01 2022
    On Tue, 05 Jul 2022 08:32:09 +0200 Christian Marillat wrote:

    Hi,

    Hello Christian,


    [Please Cc me I'm not subscribed to this list]

    Done.


    I was the displaycal (python2 version) maintainer but asked his removal
    as the curren maintain doesn't reply to e-mails

    A fork has been done, but as discussed in https://github.com/eoyilmaz/displaycal-py3/issues/96
    people do not agree to the license and project.binary name.

    Can you give me your opinion ?

    Well, first of all, I should say that the GNU GPL does not require a
    name change for modified/derived/forked versions of a work.
    And copyright law does not cover names, as far as I can tell.

    Depending on the details of diplayCAL, and on the jurisdiction under consideration (which may vary across different hypothetical lawsuits,
    due to rules for the selection of venue...), trademark laws of a
    specific country could impose a name change for a fork.

    And anyway, in order to avoid confusion with the original project, I
    personally think it would be nice that a fork adopted a distinct name. Especially if the fork is significantly diverging from the original
    project and created without talking to the original developers (because
    they do not reply, in the present case, but that doesn't change the
    fact that they were not got in touch with...).

    I agree with Paul Wise (pabs3) that "diplayCAL-ng" (or
    "displayCAL-py3") is probably too similar to the original name to avoid confusion. You should come up with something more creative (maybe "FreeScreenCalibrator"? or "calibscreen"?).

    By the way, avoiding confusion is the main point of (sane) trademark
    laws.

    I hope this helps, at least a bit.


    --
    http://www.inventati.org/frx/
    There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli .
    GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEygERR5zS79/7gjklPhwn4R9pv/4FAmLEruIACgkQPhwn4R9p v/60PhAAwTfrOzlWJHaBcFGHsf11Q76ssf2VirIv1Ot/7UJMccW6lBvJysj7pTU1 m3GfS3UOkg8uFJJjejrG3CFVwD50F3p+o04BKI8GOHdU25TCJfU2Dwvlb7Agl8Og mt6bnJQiDsEUmtFjipuAbGmW99nB662dgBt+9DX8k248Pnt5Er+eH9CtScVVd92J OuYTNzD1fr6ARzqApVN+K28O+WXw3WUFC8AVJ1etexCs+uaAuO2+HvaijCQKZc3q a7DRVkBXOXvDiFsBu+9VtL6O8NfgRBpeJ0KYcDkpZI6r2ZOSAIJ4/ctqRsoSDAgV BeyyND2y/7Lfwg/7VDDjiQDfj5T8vXp0rNsevN10tLpdidyzYU5HyF4vnBqCcmig wZgnV753wRnVE1DHPRZ9EJOSJvXXfhnbwx940/A3g5uB3J+OXjSZjUK5ooMNiIq3 PphXy0luDAoKnGGalGDEBC638GSocch0BqZbnJKopyqABXja8u1Hzahii6Dvb94D Xk1/muln6XcH4FRKXBfk3AMfMfN46UxnQnO0SbYzOqUNN6jpXxYf9Tk7ezZjvHhA 87QoweRqKu1QhbOXntr0TWyuoVYjbBp4NFeOQpUaVH7pToWiAnTQivGb2rXmCAgJ CDdwgBkV3ZTdMRih/VeFWd4lD1phgH6A