On Sun, 2021-10-17 at 13:08 +0300, Nicholas Guriev wrote:
I still have suspicions about RNNoise and its probable non-free model.
I'm the pabs3 in the HN thread you referenced. I think that RNNoise
does not meet my personal standards for Free Software and also for
machine learning. I think that under the Debian Deep Learning Team's
Machine Learning Policy, it should be classified as a ToxicCandy Model.
There isn't an official Debian position on this and there are other
similar machine learning models in Debian; the threads about tesseract
and Japanese text analysis come to mind for example:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/33417ce2bcf9b6a0efaf4771b83c6df1@debian.org
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190608184309.GA10146@goofy.osamu.debian.net
What is the current consensus on this library in Debian community?
Several maintainers have added it to Debian so it seems accepted:
mumble, chromium, qtwebengine-opensource-src, obs-studio
I already asked on debian-ai@ but nobody answered ever since.
I suggest you bring this up again.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmFuX8EACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaMPqQ//W9kfHzdqdPiQh9vG7CwFSSAqdwBxzgjdZUG8MC1kNkfJyme/fazB8wj9 jCoFDWdNj6pE8AH8auRygkh1w/YUiHq+LtjgV/2/O8/s6LKsh9I9wBDHyyZYwLVz e5q9JFUGmP7CIzE/53L5uyQoGiMBtfbsRjXtndGugkXvgWj2Aqyo/DZJZ7bULtiH dN0T6pspGcil42yt3U1d1z35uw4e1bzOs0mJWgO+k3gvKhzsGK4KRboXEjgrb+GI geeM+Py4cWI4n+tu/Rt75J3O2ulFG5s/5Qa318Iaqf6dOFM4+IbL8arj7pwGxQgZ IYzpjwKhdEEceblRLU9ZKSVgPmbQ0J+YGFFr6reGeSRQ5cgjXTtQms0Jusjaj1IT A9Aa8emIeV+SrtV8gzPfL/ofU2H+dKz1nxsNtv8zdr+uRY2X1e+f1abe8w4G+5vq 1NwfzeJa5tp5yEvncfIR11vPHEoAM7EgUzDAw1mLqb7R0kGd8MSrIDZbmS/SvvN8 uMuBCke8FD9DKFcgwdMo5FKIwl2OoMZgrHPo/WUyXEnfdKjkQWE5uVMlUYs1y4I1 k0FUQsmjmcWkRnQe1oh4Otc53kPGDriRPBzkBPvrpT5CYvF44UJjLLZpzWZ7fuu4 fwZ1V14xIS/ero20xAGcN2/Z1t0PjRLGE7mfii7ZmG7Nn8C1iRQ=
=cKUk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)