Hi Christoph,

I noticed that you uploaded libstringprep-java to NEW but it was
already in NEW at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/stringprep_2.0-1.html for the RFP
that you raised at #983384. If you want i can request the ftp-masters
to reject my package.


--
Regards
Sudip

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Re: Sudip Mukherjee

I noticed that you uploaded libstringprep-java to NEW but it was
already in NEW at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/stringprep_2.0-1.html for the RFP
that you raised at #983384. If you want i can request the ftp-masters
to reject my package.

Hi Sudip,

oh I'm sorry for missing your upload. I knew I had reported stringprep
missing in February, but was only looking in other places and didn't find my own
ITP anymore when I gave updating libpostgresql-jdbc-java another try
in April.

The problem is that libpostgresql-jdbc-java (source: libpgjava) needs stringprep 1.1, so we cannot go to 2.0 yet, at least for unstable.

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libstringprep-java_1.1-1.html (unstable) https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/stringprep_2.0-1.html (experimental)

We both picked the same binary name, but different source names. Do
you (or the java team) have a preference for either of these names?

Christoph

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 11:00 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:

Re: Sudip Mukherjee

I noticed that you uploaded libstringprep-java to NEW but it was
already in NEW at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/stringprep_2.0-1.html for the RFP
that you raised at #983384. If you want i can request the ftp-masters
to reject my package.

Hi Sudip,

oh I'm sorry for missing your upload. I knew I had reported stringprep missing in February, but was only looking in other places and didn't find my own
ITP anymore when I gave updating libpostgresql-jdbc-java another try
in April.

You created it as RFP. :)

The problem is that libpostgresql-jdbc-java (source: libpgjava) needs stringprep 1.1, so we cannot go to 2.0 yet, at least for unstable.

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libstringprep-java_1.1-1.html (unstable) https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/stringprep_2.0-1.html (experimental)

We both picked the same binary name, but different source names. Do
you (or the java team) have a preference for either of these names?

iiuc, based on Debian Java policy the source should be 'stringprep'
and the binary package should be 'libstringprep-java'.

@ftp-master - Dear FTP masters, can you please reject my upload of
'stringrep' from the queue. Thanks in advance.


--
Regards
Sudip

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Le 09/05/2021 à 14:51, Sudip Mukherjee a écrit :

We both picked the same binary name, but different source names. Do
you (or the java team) have a preference for either of these names?

iiuc, based on Debian Java policy the source should be 'stringprep'
and the binary package should be 'libstringprep-java'.

There is no absolute rule but personally I tend to prefer the upstream
project name for the source package (if it isn't too generic or confusing).

Emmanuel Bourg

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)